Pathophysiology inferred from electrodiagnostic nerve tests and classification of polyneuropathies. Suggested guidelines

Hatice Tankisi, Kirsten Pugdahl, Anders Fuglsang-Frederiksen, Birger Johnsen, Mamede De Carvalho, Peter R W Fawcett, Annick Labarre-Vila, Rocco Liguori, Wilfred A. Nix, Ian S. Schofield

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To present criteria for pathophysiological interpretation of motor and sensory nerve conduction studies and for pathophysiological classification of polyneuropathies suggested by a group of European neurophysiologists. Methods: Since 1992 seven neurophysiologists from six European countries have collected random samples of their electrodiagnostic examinations for peer review medical audit in the ESTEEM (European Standardized Telematic tool to Evaluate Electrodiagnostic Methods) project. Based on existing criteria in the literature, the experience with a patient material of 572 peer reviewed electrodiagnostic examinations, and productive discussions between the physicians at workshops, the collaboration has produced a set of criteria now routinely used at the centres involved in the project. Results: The first part of the paper considers pathophysiology of individual nerve segments. For interpretation of motor and sensory nerve conduction studies, figures showing change in amplitude versus change in conduction velocity/distal latency and change in F-wave frequency versus change in F-wave latency are presented. The suggested boundaries delimit areas corresponding to normal, axonal, demyelinated, or neuropathic nerve segments. Criteria for motor conduction block in upper and lower extremities are schematically depicted using the parameters CMAP amplitude and CMAP duration. The second part of the paper suggests criteria for classification of polyneuropathies into axonal, demyelinating, or mixed using the above-mentioned criteria. Conclusions: The suggested criteria are developed during many years of collaboration of different centres and may be useful for standardization in clinical neurophysiology. Significance: Consistent interpretation of nerve conduction studies is an important step in optimising diagnosis and treatment of nerve disorders.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1571-1580
Number of pages10
JournalClinical Neurophysiology
Volume116
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2005

Fingerprint

Polyneuropathies
Neural Conduction
Guidelines
Medical Audit
Neurophysiology
Peer Review
Lower Extremity
Physicians
Education
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Criteria for axonal loss
  • Criteria for demyelination
  • Nerve conduction studies
  • Pathophysiological states of nerves
  • Polyneuropathy classification

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Neurology
  • Sensory Systems
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Tankisi, H., Pugdahl, K., Fuglsang-Frederiksen, A., Johnsen, B., De Carvalho, M., Fawcett, P. R. W., ... Schofield, I. S. (2005). Pathophysiology inferred from electrodiagnostic nerve tests and classification of polyneuropathies. Suggested guidelines. Clinical Neurophysiology, 116(7), 1571-1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2005.04.003

Pathophysiology inferred from electrodiagnostic nerve tests and classification of polyneuropathies. Suggested guidelines. / Tankisi, Hatice; Pugdahl, Kirsten; Fuglsang-Frederiksen, Anders; Johnsen, Birger; De Carvalho, Mamede; Fawcett, Peter R W; Labarre-Vila, Annick; Liguori, Rocco; Nix, Wilfred A.; Schofield, Ian S.

In: Clinical Neurophysiology, Vol. 116, No. 7, 07.2005, p. 1571-1580.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tankisi, H, Pugdahl, K, Fuglsang-Frederiksen, A, Johnsen, B, De Carvalho, M, Fawcett, PRW, Labarre-Vila, A, Liguori, R, Nix, WA & Schofield, IS 2005, 'Pathophysiology inferred from electrodiagnostic nerve tests and classification of polyneuropathies. Suggested guidelines', Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 116, no. 7, pp. 1571-1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2005.04.003
Tankisi, Hatice ; Pugdahl, Kirsten ; Fuglsang-Frederiksen, Anders ; Johnsen, Birger ; De Carvalho, Mamede ; Fawcett, Peter R W ; Labarre-Vila, Annick ; Liguori, Rocco ; Nix, Wilfred A. ; Schofield, Ian S. / Pathophysiology inferred from electrodiagnostic nerve tests and classification of polyneuropathies. Suggested guidelines. In: Clinical Neurophysiology. 2005 ; Vol. 116, No. 7. pp. 1571-1580.
@article{85607057ba03418da095249558d158c0,
title = "Pathophysiology inferred from electrodiagnostic nerve tests and classification of polyneuropathies. Suggested guidelines",
abstract = "Objective: To present criteria for pathophysiological interpretation of motor and sensory nerve conduction studies and for pathophysiological classification of polyneuropathies suggested by a group of European neurophysiologists. Methods: Since 1992 seven neurophysiologists from six European countries have collected random samples of their electrodiagnostic examinations for peer review medical audit in the ESTEEM (European Standardized Telematic tool to Evaluate Electrodiagnostic Methods) project. Based on existing criteria in the literature, the experience with a patient material of 572 peer reviewed electrodiagnostic examinations, and productive discussions between the physicians at workshops, the collaboration has produced a set of criteria now routinely used at the centres involved in the project. Results: The first part of the paper considers pathophysiology of individual nerve segments. For interpretation of motor and sensory nerve conduction studies, figures showing change in amplitude versus change in conduction velocity/distal latency and change in F-wave frequency versus change in F-wave latency are presented. The suggested boundaries delimit areas corresponding to normal, axonal, demyelinated, or neuropathic nerve segments. Criteria for motor conduction block in upper and lower extremities are schematically depicted using the parameters CMAP amplitude and CMAP duration. The second part of the paper suggests criteria for classification of polyneuropathies into axonal, demyelinating, or mixed using the above-mentioned criteria. Conclusions: The suggested criteria are developed during many years of collaboration of different centres and may be useful for standardization in clinical neurophysiology. Significance: Consistent interpretation of nerve conduction studies is an important step in optimising diagnosis and treatment of nerve disorders.",
keywords = "Criteria for axonal loss, Criteria for demyelination, Nerve conduction studies, Pathophysiological states of nerves, Polyneuropathy classification",
author = "Hatice Tankisi and Kirsten Pugdahl and Anders Fuglsang-Frederiksen and Birger Johnsen and {De Carvalho}, Mamede and Fawcett, {Peter R W} and Annick Labarre-Vila and Rocco Liguori and Nix, {Wilfred A.} and Schofield, {Ian S.}",
year = "2005",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.clinph.2005.04.003",
language = "English",
volume = "116",
pages = "1571--1580",
journal = "Clinical Neurophysiology",
issn = "1388-2457",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pathophysiology inferred from electrodiagnostic nerve tests and classification of polyneuropathies. Suggested guidelines

AU - Tankisi, Hatice

AU - Pugdahl, Kirsten

AU - Fuglsang-Frederiksen, Anders

AU - Johnsen, Birger

AU - De Carvalho, Mamede

AU - Fawcett, Peter R W

AU - Labarre-Vila, Annick

AU - Liguori, Rocco

AU - Nix, Wilfred A.

AU - Schofield, Ian S.

PY - 2005/7

Y1 - 2005/7

N2 - Objective: To present criteria for pathophysiological interpretation of motor and sensory nerve conduction studies and for pathophysiological classification of polyneuropathies suggested by a group of European neurophysiologists. Methods: Since 1992 seven neurophysiologists from six European countries have collected random samples of their electrodiagnostic examinations for peer review medical audit in the ESTEEM (European Standardized Telematic tool to Evaluate Electrodiagnostic Methods) project. Based on existing criteria in the literature, the experience with a patient material of 572 peer reviewed electrodiagnostic examinations, and productive discussions between the physicians at workshops, the collaboration has produced a set of criteria now routinely used at the centres involved in the project. Results: The first part of the paper considers pathophysiology of individual nerve segments. For interpretation of motor and sensory nerve conduction studies, figures showing change in amplitude versus change in conduction velocity/distal latency and change in F-wave frequency versus change in F-wave latency are presented. The suggested boundaries delimit areas corresponding to normal, axonal, demyelinated, or neuropathic nerve segments. Criteria for motor conduction block in upper and lower extremities are schematically depicted using the parameters CMAP amplitude and CMAP duration. The second part of the paper suggests criteria for classification of polyneuropathies into axonal, demyelinating, or mixed using the above-mentioned criteria. Conclusions: The suggested criteria are developed during many years of collaboration of different centres and may be useful for standardization in clinical neurophysiology. Significance: Consistent interpretation of nerve conduction studies is an important step in optimising diagnosis and treatment of nerve disorders.

AB - Objective: To present criteria for pathophysiological interpretation of motor and sensory nerve conduction studies and for pathophysiological classification of polyneuropathies suggested by a group of European neurophysiologists. Methods: Since 1992 seven neurophysiologists from six European countries have collected random samples of their electrodiagnostic examinations for peer review medical audit in the ESTEEM (European Standardized Telematic tool to Evaluate Electrodiagnostic Methods) project. Based on existing criteria in the literature, the experience with a patient material of 572 peer reviewed electrodiagnostic examinations, and productive discussions between the physicians at workshops, the collaboration has produced a set of criteria now routinely used at the centres involved in the project. Results: The first part of the paper considers pathophysiology of individual nerve segments. For interpretation of motor and sensory nerve conduction studies, figures showing change in amplitude versus change in conduction velocity/distal latency and change in F-wave frequency versus change in F-wave latency are presented. The suggested boundaries delimit areas corresponding to normal, axonal, demyelinated, or neuropathic nerve segments. Criteria for motor conduction block in upper and lower extremities are schematically depicted using the parameters CMAP amplitude and CMAP duration. The second part of the paper suggests criteria for classification of polyneuropathies into axonal, demyelinating, or mixed using the above-mentioned criteria. Conclusions: The suggested criteria are developed during many years of collaboration of different centres and may be useful for standardization in clinical neurophysiology. Significance: Consistent interpretation of nerve conduction studies is an important step in optimising diagnosis and treatment of nerve disorders.

KW - Criteria for axonal loss

KW - Criteria for demyelination

KW - Nerve conduction studies

KW - Pathophysiological states of nerves

KW - Polyneuropathy classification

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=20444398426&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=20444398426&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.04.003

DO - 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.04.003

M3 - Article

C2 - 15907395

AN - SCOPUS:20444398426

VL - 116

SP - 1571

EP - 1580

JO - Clinical Neurophysiology

JF - Clinical Neurophysiology

SN - 1388-2457

IS - 7

ER -