Patient-level compared with study-level meta-analyses demonstrate consistency of D-dimer as predictor of venous thromboembolic recurrences

Maura Marcucci, Catrin Tudur Smith, James D. Douketis, Alberto Tosetto, Trevor Baglin, Mary Cushman, Sabine Eichinger, Gualtiero Palareti, Daniela Poli, Robert Campbell Tait, Alfonso Iorio

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: We compared the performance of aggregate data (AD)-based and individual patient data (IPD)-based meta-analyses to synthesize evidence on the ability of D-dimer to distinguish recurrence risk in patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism (VTE) who stopped anticoagulation. Study Design and Setting: We compared the results of the published AD-based rate ratio of VTE recurrence for positive vs. negative D-dimer, estimated by a mixed-effect Poisson model, with those of the IPD-based hazard ratio obtained by a Cox regression stratified by trial. We performed three additional analyses to investigate the methodological reasons for differences between the two approaches, comparing the IPD Cox regression with AD generated from IPD Poisson regression (to control for differences in population on study), AD time-to-event meta-analysis, and AD generated from IPD meta-regression. Results: Published analyses agreed in direction and statistical significance when estimating the prognostic value of D-dimer even if IPD estimates suggested a stronger effect. The additional analyses suggested that differences in study populations might explain this slight difference. Poor reporting in published studies precluded a true comparison of AD- and IPD-based assessments of heterogeneity sources. Conclusion: AD and IPD meta-analyses yielded similar estimates of D-dimer effect to distinguish risk for recurrent VTE. The IPD approach was justified by the need to investigate sources of heterogeneity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)415-425
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume66
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2013

Fingerprint

Meta-Analysis
Recurrence
Venous Thromboembolism
fibrin fragment D
Population

Keywords

  • D-dimer
  • Individual patient data
  • Meta-analysis
  • Prognosis
  • Sources of heterogeneity
  • Time to event

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology

Cite this

Patient-level compared with study-level meta-analyses demonstrate consistency of D-dimer as predictor of venous thromboembolic recurrences. / Marcucci, Maura; Smith, Catrin Tudur; Douketis, James D.; Tosetto, Alberto; Baglin, Trevor; Cushman, Mary; Eichinger, Sabine; Palareti, Gualtiero; Poli, Daniela; Tait, Robert Campbell; Iorio, Alfonso.

In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 66, No. 4, 04.2013, p. 415-425.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Marcucci, M, Smith, CT, Douketis, JD, Tosetto, A, Baglin, T, Cushman, M, Eichinger, S, Palareti, G, Poli, D, Tait, RC & Iorio, A 2013, 'Patient-level compared with study-level meta-analyses demonstrate consistency of D-dimer as predictor of venous thromboembolic recurrences', Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 415-425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.08.007
Marcucci, Maura ; Smith, Catrin Tudur ; Douketis, James D. ; Tosetto, Alberto ; Baglin, Trevor ; Cushman, Mary ; Eichinger, Sabine ; Palareti, Gualtiero ; Poli, Daniela ; Tait, Robert Campbell ; Iorio, Alfonso. / Patient-level compared with study-level meta-analyses demonstrate consistency of D-dimer as predictor of venous thromboembolic recurrences. In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2013 ; Vol. 66, No. 4. pp. 415-425.
@article{96d75a95717b4e0a8493c4d61eccf575,
title = "Patient-level compared with study-level meta-analyses demonstrate consistency of D-dimer as predictor of venous thromboembolic recurrences",
abstract = "Objective: We compared the performance of aggregate data (AD)-based and individual patient data (IPD)-based meta-analyses to synthesize evidence on the ability of D-dimer to distinguish recurrence risk in patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism (VTE) who stopped anticoagulation. Study Design and Setting: We compared the results of the published AD-based rate ratio of VTE recurrence for positive vs. negative D-dimer, estimated by a mixed-effect Poisson model, with those of the IPD-based hazard ratio obtained by a Cox regression stratified by trial. We performed three additional analyses to investigate the methodological reasons for differences between the two approaches, comparing the IPD Cox regression with AD generated from IPD Poisson regression (to control for differences in population on study), AD time-to-event meta-analysis, and AD generated from IPD meta-regression. Results: Published analyses agreed in direction and statistical significance when estimating the prognostic value of D-dimer even if IPD estimates suggested a stronger effect. The additional analyses suggested that differences in study populations might explain this slight difference. Poor reporting in published studies precluded a true comparison of AD- and IPD-based assessments of heterogeneity sources. Conclusion: AD and IPD meta-analyses yielded similar estimates of D-dimer effect to distinguish risk for recurrent VTE. The IPD approach was justified by the need to investigate sources of heterogeneity.",
keywords = "D-dimer, Individual patient data, Meta-analysis, Prognosis, Sources of heterogeneity, Time to event",
author = "Maura Marcucci and Smith, {Catrin Tudur} and Douketis, {James D.} and Alberto Tosetto and Trevor Baglin and Mary Cushman and Sabine Eichinger and Gualtiero Palareti and Daniela Poli and Tait, {Robert Campbell} and Alfonso Iorio",
year = "2013",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.08.007",
language = "English",
volume = "66",
pages = "415--425",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Epidemiology",
issn = "0895-4356",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patient-level compared with study-level meta-analyses demonstrate consistency of D-dimer as predictor of venous thromboembolic recurrences

AU - Marcucci, Maura

AU - Smith, Catrin Tudur

AU - Douketis, James D.

AU - Tosetto, Alberto

AU - Baglin, Trevor

AU - Cushman, Mary

AU - Eichinger, Sabine

AU - Palareti, Gualtiero

AU - Poli, Daniela

AU - Tait, Robert Campbell

AU - Iorio, Alfonso

PY - 2013/4

Y1 - 2013/4

N2 - Objective: We compared the performance of aggregate data (AD)-based and individual patient data (IPD)-based meta-analyses to synthesize evidence on the ability of D-dimer to distinguish recurrence risk in patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism (VTE) who stopped anticoagulation. Study Design and Setting: We compared the results of the published AD-based rate ratio of VTE recurrence for positive vs. negative D-dimer, estimated by a mixed-effect Poisson model, with those of the IPD-based hazard ratio obtained by a Cox regression stratified by trial. We performed three additional analyses to investigate the methodological reasons for differences between the two approaches, comparing the IPD Cox regression with AD generated from IPD Poisson regression (to control for differences in population on study), AD time-to-event meta-analysis, and AD generated from IPD meta-regression. Results: Published analyses agreed in direction and statistical significance when estimating the prognostic value of D-dimer even if IPD estimates suggested a stronger effect. The additional analyses suggested that differences in study populations might explain this slight difference. Poor reporting in published studies precluded a true comparison of AD- and IPD-based assessments of heterogeneity sources. Conclusion: AD and IPD meta-analyses yielded similar estimates of D-dimer effect to distinguish risk for recurrent VTE. The IPD approach was justified by the need to investigate sources of heterogeneity.

AB - Objective: We compared the performance of aggregate data (AD)-based and individual patient data (IPD)-based meta-analyses to synthesize evidence on the ability of D-dimer to distinguish recurrence risk in patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism (VTE) who stopped anticoagulation. Study Design and Setting: We compared the results of the published AD-based rate ratio of VTE recurrence for positive vs. negative D-dimer, estimated by a mixed-effect Poisson model, with those of the IPD-based hazard ratio obtained by a Cox regression stratified by trial. We performed three additional analyses to investigate the methodological reasons for differences between the two approaches, comparing the IPD Cox regression with AD generated from IPD Poisson regression (to control for differences in population on study), AD time-to-event meta-analysis, and AD generated from IPD meta-regression. Results: Published analyses agreed in direction and statistical significance when estimating the prognostic value of D-dimer even if IPD estimates suggested a stronger effect. The additional analyses suggested that differences in study populations might explain this slight difference. Poor reporting in published studies precluded a true comparison of AD- and IPD-based assessments of heterogeneity sources. Conclusion: AD and IPD meta-analyses yielded similar estimates of D-dimer effect to distinguish risk for recurrent VTE. The IPD approach was justified by the need to investigate sources of heterogeneity.

KW - D-dimer

KW - Individual patient data

KW - Meta-analysis

KW - Prognosis

KW - Sources of heterogeneity

KW - Time to event

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875264421&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875264421&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.08.007

DO - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.08.007

M3 - Article

C2 - 23395515

AN - SCOPUS:84875264421

VL - 66

SP - 415

EP - 425

JO - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

JF - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

SN - 0895-4356

IS - 4

ER -