Patient radiation exposure during different kyphoplasty techniques

Denis Panizza, Massimo Barbieri, Francesco Parisoli, Luca Moro

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The scope of this study was to quantify patient radiation exposure during two different techniques of kyphoplasty (KP), which differ by a cement delivery method, in order to assess whether or not one of the two used methods can reduce the patient dose. Twenty patients were examined for this investigation. One X-ray fluoroscopy unit was used for localization, navigation and monitoring of cement delivery. The patient biometric data, the setting of the fluoroscope, the exposure time and the kerma-area product (KAP) were monitored in all the procedures for anteroposterior (AP) and lateral (LL) fluoroscopic projections in order to assess the range of radiation doses imparted to the patient. Theoretical entrance skin dose (ESD) and effective dose (E) were calculated from intraoperatively measured KAP. An average ET per procedure was 1.5±0.5 min for the manual injection technique (study A) and 1.4±0.4 min for the distance delivery technique (study B) in the AP plane, while 3.2±0.7 and 5.1±0.6 min in the lateral plane, respectively. ESD was estimated as an average of 0.10±0.06 Gy for study A and 0.13±0.13 Gy for study B in the AP or/and 0.59±0.46 and 1.05±0.36 Gy in the lateral view, respectively. The cumulative mean E was 1.9±1.0 mSv procedure-1 for study A and 3.6±0.9 mSv procedure-1 for study B. Patient radiation exposure and associated effective dose from KP may be considerable. The technique of distance cement delivery appears to be slower than the manual injection technique and it requires a more protracted fluoroscopic control in the lateral projection, so that this system entails a higher amount of dose to the patient.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbernct214
Pages (from-to)230-234
Number of pages5
JournalRadiation Protection Dosimetry
Volume158
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2014

Fingerprint

Kyphoplasty
radiation dosage
dosage
delivery
cements
entrances
projection
injection
fluoroscopy
biometrics
Skin
Injections
Fluoroscopy
products
Radiation Exposure
navigation
X-Rays
Radiation
radiation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Radiation
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Patient radiation exposure during different kyphoplasty techniques. / Panizza, Denis; Barbieri, Massimo; Parisoli, Francesco; Moro, Luca.

In: Radiation Protection Dosimetry, Vol. 158, No. 2, nct214, 01.2014, p. 230-234.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Panizza, Denis ; Barbieri, Massimo ; Parisoli, Francesco ; Moro, Luca. / Patient radiation exposure during different kyphoplasty techniques. In: Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 2014 ; Vol. 158, No. 2. pp. 230-234.
@article{b334e97b24e949489057701287b6ef85,
title = "Patient radiation exposure during different kyphoplasty techniques",
abstract = "The scope of this study was to quantify patient radiation exposure during two different techniques of kyphoplasty (KP), which differ by a cement delivery method, in order to assess whether or not one of the two used methods can reduce the patient dose. Twenty patients were examined for this investigation. One X-ray fluoroscopy unit was used for localization, navigation and monitoring of cement delivery. The patient biometric data, the setting of the fluoroscope, the exposure time and the kerma-area product (KAP) were monitored in all the procedures for anteroposterior (AP) and lateral (LL) fluoroscopic projections in order to assess the range of radiation doses imparted to the patient. Theoretical entrance skin dose (ESD) and effective dose (E) were calculated from intraoperatively measured KAP. An average ET per procedure was 1.5±0.5 min for the manual injection technique (study A) and 1.4±0.4 min for the distance delivery technique (study B) in the AP plane, while 3.2±0.7 and 5.1±0.6 min in the lateral plane, respectively. ESD was estimated as an average of 0.10±0.06 Gy for study A and 0.13±0.13 Gy for study B in the AP or/and 0.59±0.46 and 1.05±0.36 Gy in the lateral view, respectively. The cumulative mean E was 1.9±1.0 mSv procedure-1 for study A and 3.6±0.9 mSv procedure-1 for study B. Patient radiation exposure and associated effective dose from KP may be considerable. The technique of distance cement delivery appears to be slower than the manual injection technique and it requires a more protracted fluoroscopic control in the lateral projection, so that this system entails a higher amount of dose to the patient.",
author = "Denis Panizza and Massimo Barbieri and Francesco Parisoli and Luca Moro",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1093/rpd/nct214",
language = "English",
volume = "158",
pages = "230--234",
journal = "Radiation Protection Dosimetry",
issn = "0144-8420",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patient radiation exposure during different kyphoplasty techniques

AU - Panizza, Denis

AU - Barbieri, Massimo

AU - Parisoli, Francesco

AU - Moro, Luca

PY - 2014/1

Y1 - 2014/1

N2 - The scope of this study was to quantify patient radiation exposure during two different techniques of kyphoplasty (KP), which differ by a cement delivery method, in order to assess whether or not one of the two used methods can reduce the patient dose. Twenty patients were examined for this investigation. One X-ray fluoroscopy unit was used for localization, navigation and monitoring of cement delivery. The patient biometric data, the setting of the fluoroscope, the exposure time and the kerma-area product (KAP) were monitored in all the procedures for anteroposterior (AP) and lateral (LL) fluoroscopic projections in order to assess the range of radiation doses imparted to the patient. Theoretical entrance skin dose (ESD) and effective dose (E) were calculated from intraoperatively measured KAP. An average ET per procedure was 1.5±0.5 min for the manual injection technique (study A) and 1.4±0.4 min for the distance delivery technique (study B) in the AP plane, while 3.2±0.7 and 5.1±0.6 min in the lateral plane, respectively. ESD was estimated as an average of 0.10±0.06 Gy for study A and 0.13±0.13 Gy for study B in the AP or/and 0.59±0.46 and 1.05±0.36 Gy in the lateral view, respectively. The cumulative mean E was 1.9±1.0 mSv procedure-1 for study A and 3.6±0.9 mSv procedure-1 for study B. Patient radiation exposure and associated effective dose from KP may be considerable. The technique of distance cement delivery appears to be slower than the manual injection technique and it requires a more protracted fluoroscopic control in the lateral projection, so that this system entails a higher amount of dose to the patient.

AB - The scope of this study was to quantify patient radiation exposure during two different techniques of kyphoplasty (KP), which differ by a cement delivery method, in order to assess whether or not one of the two used methods can reduce the patient dose. Twenty patients were examined for this investigation. One X-ray fluoroscopy unit was used for localization, navigation and monitoring of cement delivery. The patient biometric data, the setting of the fluoroscope, the exposure time and the kerma-area product (KAP) were monitored in all the procedures for anteroposterior (AP) and lateral (LL) fluoroscopic projections in order to assess the range of radiation doses imparted to the patient. Theoretical entrance skin dose (ESD) and effective dose (E) were calculated from intraoperatively measured KAP. An average ET per procedure was 1.5±0.5 min for the manual injection technique (study A) and 1.4±0.4 min for the distance delivery technique (study B) in the AP plane, while 3.2±0.7 and 5.1±0.6 min in the lateral plane, respectively. ESD was estimated as an average of 0.10±0.06 Gy for study A and 0.13±0.13 Gy for study B in the AP or/and 0.59±0.46 and 1.05±0.36 Gy in the lateral view, respectively. The cumulative mean E was 1.9±1.0 mSv procedure-1 for study A and 3.6±0.9 mSv procedure-1 for study B. Patient radiation exposure and associated effective dose from KP may be considerable. The technique of distance cement delivery appears to be slower than the manual injection technique and it requires a more protracted fluoroscopic control in the lateral projection, so that this system entails a higher amount of dose to the patient.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84892986031&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84892986031&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/rpd/nct214

DO - 10.1093/rpd/nct214

M3 - Article

C2 - 24030142

AN - SCOPUS:84892986031

VL - 158

SP - 230

EP - 234

JO - Radiation Protection Dosimetry

JF - Radiation Protection Dosimetry

SN - 0144-8420

IS - 2

M1 - nct214

ER -