Patient-reported outcomes from KATHERINE: A phase 3 study of adjuvant trastuzumab emtansine versus trastuzumab in patients with residual invasive disease after neoadjuvant therapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer

PierFranco Conte, Andreas Schneeweiss, Sibylle Loibl, Eleftherios P Mamounas, Gunter von Minckwitz, Max S Mano, Michael Untch, Chiun-Sheng Huang, Norman Wolmark, Priya Rastogi, Veronique D'Hondt, Andrés Redondo, Ljiljana Stamatovic, Hervé Bonnefoi, Hugo Castro-Salguero, Hans H Fischer, Tanya Wahl, Chunyan Song, Thomas Boulet, Peter TraskCharles E Geyer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The phase 3 KATHERINE trial demonstrated significantly improved invasive disease-free survival with adjuvant trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) versus trastuzumab in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer and residual invasive disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus HER2-targeted therapy.

METHODS: Patients who received taxane- and trastuzumab-containing neoadjuvant therapy (with/without anthracyclines) and had residual invasive disease (breast and/or axillary nodes) at surgery were randomly assigned to 14 cycles of adjuvant T-DM1 (3.6 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks) or trastuzumab (6 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks). The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) and breast cancer module (QLQ-BR23) were completed at screening, at day 1 of cycles 5 and 11, within 30 days after study drug completion, and at 6- and 12-month follow-up visits.

RESULTS: Of patients who were randomly assigned to T-DM1 (n = 743) and trastuzumab (n = 743), 612 (82%) and 640 (86%), respectively, had valid baseline and ≥1 postbaseline assessments. No clinically meaningful changes (≥10 points) from baseline in mean QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 scores occurred in either arm. More patients receiving T-DM1 reported clinically meaningful deterioration at any assessment point in role functioning (49% vs 41%), appetite loss (38% vs 28%), constipation (47% vs 38%), fatigue (66% vs 60%), nausea/vomiting (39% vs 30%), and systemic therapy side effects (49% vs 36%). These differences were no longer apparent at the 6-month follow-up assessment, except for role functioning (23% vs 16%).

CONCLUSION: These data suggest that health-related quality of life was generally maintained in both study arms over the course of treatment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3132-3139
Number of pages8
JournalCancer
Volume126
Issue number13
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 1 2020

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Patient-reported outcomes from KATHERINE: A phase 3 study of adjuvant trastuzumab emtansine versus trastuzumab in patients with residual invasive disease after neoadjuvant therapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this