Patients' assessment of quality of care: A survey of a group of breast cancer patients in Italy

A. Liberati, C. Confalonieri, G. Martino, R. Talamini, M. Tamburini, P. Viola, G. Tognoni

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Patients' assessment of quality of care was investigated in 825 women with breast cancer treated in a group of specialized and non-specialized institutions in Italy. A 10-page mail questionnaire explored patients' adjustment to the disease, satisfaction with care, and quality of the information on diagnosis and treatment. Most of the 428 (52%) responders reported good or acceptable adjustment to the disease (as reflected by acceptable performance in some daily living activities), and favorable judgement about care providers, but many women complained of hospital organizational deficiences. A contradictory picture emerged regarding the quality of information. Completeness and thoroughness appeared seriously deficient when examined objectively using a series of explicit predefined criteria, but patients' assessments showed in most cases moderate or high satisfaction. The paper presents these results and discusses pros and cons in the use of patients' opinions for evaluation of quality of care.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)491-497
Number of pages7
JournalTumori
Volume71
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - 1985

Fingerprint

Quality of Health Care
Italy
Breast Neoplasms
Social Adjustment
Postal Service
Activities of Daily Living
Surveys and Questionnaires
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cancer Research

Cite this

Liberati, A., Confalonieri, C., Martino, G., Talamini, R., Tamburini, M., Viola, P., & Tognoni, G. (1985). Patients' assessment of quality of care: A survey of a group of breast cancer patients in Italy. Tumori, 71(5), 491-497.

Patients' assessment of quality of care : A survey of a group of breast cancer patients in Italy. / Liberati, A.; Confalonieri, C.; Martino, G.; Talamini, R.; Tamburini, M.; Viola, P.; Tognoni, G.

In: Tumori, Vol. 71, No. 5, 1985, p. 491-497.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Liberati, A, Confalonieri, C, Martino, G, Talamini, R, Tamburini, M, Viola, P & Tognoni, G 1985, 'Patients' assessment of quality of care: A survey of a group of breast cancer patients in Italy', Tumori, vol. 71, no. 5, pp. 491-497.
Liberati A, Confalonieri C, Martino G, Talamini R, Tamburini M, Viola P et al. Patients' assessment of quality of care: A survey of a group of breast cancer patients in Italy. Tumori. 1985;71(5):491-497.
Liberati, A. ; Confalonieri, C. ; Martino, G. ; Talamini, R. ; Tamburini, M. ; Viola, P. ; Tognoni, G. / Patients' assessment of quality of care : A survey of a group of breast cancer patients in Italy. In: Tumori. 1985 ; Vol. 71, No. 5. pp. 491-497.
@article{274d21f869ad4c71bc6a9402374d1024,
title = "Patients' assessment of quality of care: A survey of a group of breast cancer patients in Italy",
abstract = "Patients' assessment of quality of care was investigated in 825 women with breast cancer treated in a group of specialized and non-specialized institutions in Italy. A 10-page mail questionnaire explored patients' adjustment to the disease, satisfaction with care, and quality of the information on diagnosis and treatment. Most of the 428 (52{\%}) responders reported good or acceptable adjustment to the disease (as reflected by acceptable performance in some daily living activities), and favorable judgement about care providers, but many women complained of hospital organizational deficiences. A contradictory picture emerged regarding the quality of information. Completeness and thoroughness appeared seriously deficient when examined objectively using a series of explicit predefined criteria, but patients' assessments showed in most cases moderate or high satisfaction. The paper presents these results and discusses pros and cons in the use of patients' opinions for evaluation of quality of care.",
author = "A. Liberati and C. Confalonieri and G. Martino and R. Talamini and M. Tamburini and P. Viola and G. Tognoni",
year = "1985",
language = "English",
volume = "71",
pages = "491--497",
journal = "Tumori",
issn = "0300-8916",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patients' assessment of quality of care

T2 - A survey of a group of breast cancer patients in Italy

AU - Liberati, A.

AU - Confalonieri, C.

AU - Martino, G.

AU - Talamini, R.

AU - Tamburini, M.

AU - Viola, P.

AU - Tognoni, G.

PY - 1985

Y1 - 1985

N2 - Patients' assessment of quality of care was investigated in 825 women with breast cancer treated in a group of specialized and non-specialized institutions in Italy. A 10-page mail questionnaire explored patients' adjustment to the disease, satisfaction with care, and quality of the information on diagnosis and treatment. Most of the 428 (52%) responders reported good or acceptable adjustment to the disease (as reflected by acceptable performance in some daily living activities), and favorable judgement about care providers, but many women complained of hospital organizational deficiences. A contradictory picture emerged regarding the quality of information. Completeness and thoroughness appeared seriously deficient when examined objectively using a series of explicit predefined criteria, but patients' assessments showed in most cases moderate or high satisfaction. The paper presents these results and discusses pros and cons in the use of patients' opinions for evaluation of quality of care.

AB - Patients' assessment of quality of care was investigated in 825 women with breast cancer treated in a group of specialized and non-specialized institutions in Italy. A 10-page mail questionnaire explored patients' adjustment to the disease, satisfaction with care, and quality of the information on diagnosis and treatment. Most of the 428 (52%) responders reported good or acceptable adjustment to the disease (as reflected by acceptable performance in some daily living activities), and favorable judgement about care providers, but many women complained of hospital organizational deficiences. A contradictory picture emerged regarding the quality of information. Completeness and thoroughness appeared seriously deficient when examined objectively using a series of explicit predefined criteria, but patients' assessments showed in most cases moderate or high satisfaction. The paper presents these results and discusses pros and cons in the use of patients' opinions for evaluation of quality of care.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0022403630&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0022403630&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 4060250

AN - SCOPUS:0022403630

VL - 71

SP - 491

EP - 497

JO - Tumori

JF - Tumori

SN - 0300-8916

IS - 5

ER -