Patients with prehypertension - do we have enough evidence to treat them?

Michalska Marta, Alberto Zanchetti, Nathan D. Wong, Jolanta Malyszko, Jacek Rysz, Maciej Banach

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


In 2003, the Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure established a definition of a new category of BP levels called 'prehypertension' (preHT) that included individuals with a systolic BP of 120-139 mm Hg or a diastolic BP of 80-89 mm Hg. Patients with preHT were considered to be at increased risk for progression to hypertension and in individuals with BP in the range 130/80 to 139/89 mmHg the risk of developing hypertension was twice as high as in subjects with lower values. Still then there has been a large debate whether the introduction of preHT was based on evidence and as a consequence, it was fully justified. It has been suggested that the term prehypertension may in many subjects create anxiety and a need for unnecessary medical visits and examinations. This group of patients is also very heterogeneous and it has been pointed out that subdividing preHT group into individuals with normal BP and high normal BP would much better correspond to the continuum of BP risk for CV disease. Finally, despite some data suggesting the potential benefits of antihypertensive therapy in patients with preHT (high normal BP), there are still no hard evidences on the outcome reduction by giving antihypertensive drugs in these individuals.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)586-597
Number of pages12
JournalCurrent Vascular Pharmacology
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2014


  • Blood pressure
  • Cardiovascular risk
  • High normal blood pressure
  • Hypertension
  • Prehypertension
  • Risk stratification

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Pharmacology
  • Medicine(all)


Dive into the research topics of 'Patients with prehypertension - do we have enough evidence to treat them?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this