Pelvic factor infertility: Diagnosis and prognosis of various procedures

Carlo Bulletti, I. Panzini, A. Borini, E. Coccia, Paolo Levi Setti, Antonio Palagiano

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

Infertile women are examined to exclude tubal occlusion or a pelvic factor through indirect tests, such as hysterosalpingography (HSG), sonohysterosalpingography/hysterosalpingosonography (SH), and/or laparoscopy (Lps). Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) are proposed to resolve infertility according to the results of the above-mentioned diagnostic procedures. Today, Lps still represents the second option after several failures of in vivo attempts and before moving to conceive in vitro. The aim of this study was to establish the diagnostic power of HSG and SH compared with that of Lps and the efficacy of ART when each single test is used as an inclusion criterion. We recruited 2560 infertile women (aged 20 to 35) to undergo diagnostic and therapeutic procedures to address their infertility in our clinical theatre. Of these, 1080 women underwent Lps and hysteroscopy (Group 1), 525 underwent HSG (Group 2), and 955 underwent SH (Group 3). The positive and negative predictive values of sonosalpingosonography were 75.8% and 91.2% and those of hysterosalpingography were 71.8% and 88.2%, respectively. Endometriosis (stage II-IV of the revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine [ASRM] classification) was diagnosed laparoscopically in 344 out of 1080 women (32%). Only 44 women (13%) with endometriosis showed bilateral tubal occlusion. Pelvic factors other than tubal occlusions are neither diagnosed nor treated in a timely manner by indirect tubal patency tests. The conventional use of HSG and/or SH may increase the time required to find an adequate treatment by which to achieve a successful pregnancy.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Pages73-82
Number of pages10
Volume1127
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2008

Publication series

NameAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Volume1127
ISSN (Print)00778923
ISSN (Electronic)17496632

Fingerprint

Laparoscopy
Hysterosalpingography
Infertility
Tubal Sterilization
Assisted Reproductive Techniques
Endometriosis
Theaters
Hysteroscopy
Pregnancy
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Endometriosis
  • Hysterosalpingography
  • Hysterosalpingosonography
  • Hysteroscopy
  • Laparoscopy
  • Pelvic factor
  • Pelvic inflammatory disease
  • Sonohysterosalpingography
  • Sterility
  • Tubal occlusion
  • Tubal patency

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)

Cite this

Bulletti, C., Panzini, I., Borini, A., Coccia, E., Setti, P. L., & Palagiano, A. (2008). Pelvic factor infertility: Diagnosis and prognosis of various procedures. In Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (Vol. 1127, pp. 73-82). (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences; Vol. 1127). https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1434.020

Pelvic factor infertility : Diagnosis and prognosis of various procedures. / Bulletti, Carlo; Panzini, I.; Borini, A.; Coccia, E.; Setti, Paolo Levi; Palagiano, Antonio.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. Vol. 1127 2008. p. 73-82 (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences; Vol. 1127).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Bulletti, C, Panzini, I, Borini, A, Coccia, E, Setti, PL & Palagiano, A 2008, Pelvic factor infertility: Diagnosis and prognosis of various procedures. in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. vol. 1127, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1127, pp. 73-82. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1434.020
Bulletti C, Panzini I, Borini A, Coccia E, Setti PL, Palagiano A. Pelvic factor infertility: Diagnosis and prognosis of various procedures. In Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. Vol. 1127. 2008. p. 73-82. (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences). https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1434.020
Bulletti, Carlo ; Panzini, I. ; Borini, A. ; Coccia, E. ; Setti, Paolo Levi ; Palagiano, Antonio. / Pelvic factor infertility : Diagnosis and prognosis of various procedures. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. Vol. 1127 2008. pp. 73-82 (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences).
@inproceedings{e458705f37964002877252e555915b83,
title = "Pelvic factor infertility: Diagnosis and prognosis of various procedures",
abstract = "Infertile women are examined to exclude tubal occlusion or a pelvic factor through indirect tests, such as hysterosalpingography (HSG), sonohysterosalpingography/hysterosalpingosonography (SH), and/or laparoscopy (Lps). Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) are proposed to resolve infertility according to the results of the above-mentioned diagnostic procedures. Today, Lps still represents the second option after several failures of in vivo attempts and before moving to conceive in vitro. The aim of this study was to establish the diagnostic power of HSG and SH compared with that of Lps and the efficacy of ART when each single test is used as an inclusion criterion. We recruited 2560 infertile women (aged 20 to 35) to undergo diagnostic and therapeutic procedures to address their infertility in our clinical theatre. Of these, 1080 women underwent Lps and hysteroscopy (Group 1), 525 underwent HSG (Group 2), and 955 underwent SH (Group 3). The positive and negative predictive values of sonosalpingosonography were 75.8{\%} and 91.2{\%} and those of hysterosalpingography were 71.8{\%} and 88.2{\%}, respectively. Endometriosis (stage II-IV of the revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine [ASRM] classification) was diagnosed laparoscopically in 344 out of 1080 women (32{\%}). Only 44 women (13{\%}) with endometriosis showed bilateral tubal occlusion. Pelvic factors other than tubal occlusions are neither diagnosed nor treated in a timely manner by indirect tubal patency tests. The conventional use of HSG and/or SH may increase the time required to find an adequate treatment by which to achieve a successful pregnancy.",
keywords = "Endometriosis, Hysterosalpingography, Hysterosalpingosonography, Hysteroscopy, Laparoscopy, Pelvic factor, Pelvic inflammatory disease, Sonohysterosalpingography, Sterility, Tubal occlusion, Tubal patency",
author = "Carlo Bulletti and I. Panzini and A. Borini and E. Coccia and Setti, {Paolo Levi} and Antonio Palagiano",
year = "2008",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1196/annals.1434.020",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781573317207",
volume = "1127",
series = "Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences",
pages = "73--82",
booktitle = "Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Pelvic factor infertility

T2 - Diagnosis and prognosis of various procedures

AU - Bulletti, Carlo

AU - Panzini, I.

AU - Borini, A.

AU - Coccia, E.

AU - Setti, Paolo Levi

AU - Palagiano, Antonio

PY - 2008/4

Y1 - 2008/4

N2 - Infertile women are examined to exclude tubal occlusion or a pelvic factor through indirect tests, such as hysterosalpingography (HSG), sonohysterosalpingography/hysterosalpingosonography (SH), and/or laparoscopy (Lps). Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) are proposed to resolve infertility according to the results of the above-mentioned diagnostic procedures. Today, Lps still represents the second option after several failures of in vivo attempts and before moving to conceive in vitro. The aim of this study was to establish the diagnostic power of HSG and SH compared with that of Lps and the efficacy of ART when each single test is used as an inclusion criterion. We recruited 2560 infertile women (aged 20 to 35) to undergo diagnostic and therapeutic procedures to address their infertility in our clinical theatre. Of these, 1080 women underwent Lps and hysteroscopy (Group 1), 525 underwent HSG (Group 2), and 955 underwent SH (Group 3). The positive and negative predictive values of sonosalpingosonography were 75.8% and 91.2% and those of hysterosalpingography were 71.8% and 88.2%, respectively. Endometriosis (stage II-IV of the revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine [ASRM] classification) was diagnosed laparoscopically in 344 out of 1080 women (32%). Only 44 women (13%) with endometriosis showed bilateral tubal occlusion. Pelvic factors other than tubal occlusions are neither diagnosed nor treated in a timely manner by indirect tubal patency tests. The conventional use of HSG and/or SH may increase the time required to find an adequate treatment by which to achieve a successful pregnancy.

AB - Infertile women are examined to exclude tubal occlusion or a pelvic factor through indirect tests, such as hysterosalpingography (HSG), sonohysterosalpingography/hysterosalpingosonography (SH), and/or laparoscopy (Lps). Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) are proposed to resolve infertility according to the results of the above-mentioned diagnostic procedures. Today, Lps still represents the second option after several failures of in vivo attempts and before moving to conceive in vitro. The aim of this study was to establish the diagnostic power of HSG and SH compared with that of Lps and the efficacy of ART when each single test is used as an inclusion criterion. We recruited 2560 infertile women (aged 20 to 35) to undergo diagnostic and therapeutic procedures to address their infertility in our clinical theatre. Of these, 1080 women underwent Lps and hysteroscopy (Group 1), 525 underwent HSG (Group 2), and 955 underwent SH (Group 3). The positive and negative predictive values of sonosalpingosonography were 75.8% and 91.2% and those of hysterosalpingography were 71.8% and 88.2%, respectively. Endometriosis (stage II-IV of the revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine [ASRM] classification) was diagnosed laparoscopically in 344 out of 1080 women (32%). Only 44 women (13%) with endometriosis showed bilateral tubal occlusion. Pelvic factors other than tubal occlusions are neither diagnosed nor treated in a timely manner by indirect tubal patency tests. The conventional use of HSG and/or SH may increase the time required to find an adequate treatment by which to achieve a successful pregnancy.

KW - Endometriosis

KW - Hysterosalpingography

KW - Hysterosalpingosonography

KW - Hysteroscopy

KW - Laparoscopy

KW - Pelvic factor

KW - Pelvic inflammatory disease

KW - Sonohysterosalpingography

KW - Sterility

KW - Tubal occlusion

KW - Tubal patency

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=42449092469&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=42449092469&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1196/annals.1434.020

DO - 10.1196/annals.1434.020

M3 - Conference contribution

C2 - 18443333

AN - SCOPUS:42449092469

SN - 9781573317207

VL - 1127

T3 - Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

SP - 73

EP - 82

BT - Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

ER -