Percutaneous recanalization of chronic total occlusions: Wherein lies the body of proof?

Corrado Tamburino, Piera Capranzano, Davide Capodanno, George Dangas, Marco Zimarino, Theodore A. Bass, Roxana Mehran, David Antoniucci, Antonio Colombo, Alessio La Manna, Maria E. Di Salvo, Gregg W. Stone

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although interventional technology and skills have markedly advanced, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO) lesions remains challenging. Indeed, CTO PCI is technically complex, carries the potential for a relatively high likelihood of failure and acute complications, and requires specifically skilled operators and a demanding use of resources. In addition, controversy persists surrounding appropriate indications for attempting CTO revascularization. Finally, there is a wide uncertainty on the actual benefits achieved with successful CTO recanalization. A growing number of studies have reported procedural results and/or assessed functional effects and long-term clinical outcomes of CTO PCI. We therefore sought to review and critically appraise the evidence base for procedural outcomes and potential clinical benefits of CTO PCI.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)133-142
Number of pages10
JournalAmerican Heart Journal
Volume165
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2013

Fingerprint

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Uncertainty
Technology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Tamburino, C., Capranzano, P., Capodanno, D., Dangas, G., Zimarino, M., Bass, T. A., ... Stone, G. W. (2013). Percutaneous recanalization of chronic total occlusions: Wherein lies the body of proof? American Heart Journal, 165(2), 133-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2012.10.017

Percutaneous recanalization of chronic total occlusions : Wherein lies the body of proof? / Tamburino, Corrado; Capranzano, Piera; Capodanno, Davide; Dangas, George; Zimarino, Marco; Bass, Theodore A.; Mehran, Roxana; Antoniucci, David; Colombo, Antonio; La Manna, Alessio; Di Salvo, Maria E.; Stone, Gregg W.

In: American Heart Journal, Vol. 165, No. 2, 02.2013, p. 133-142.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tamburino, C, Capranzano, P, Capodanno, D, Dangas, G, Zimarino, M, Bass, TA, Mehran, R, Antoniucci, D, Colombo, A, La Manna, A, Di Salvo, ME & Stone, GW 2013, 'Percutaneous recanalization of chronic total occlusions: Wherein lies the body of proof?', American Heart Journal, vol. 165, no. 2, pp. 133-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2012.10.017
Tamburino C, Capranzano P, Capodanno D, Dangas G, Zimarino M, Bass TA et al. Percutaneous recanalization of chronic total occlusions: Wherein lies the body of proof? American Heart Journal. 2013 Feb;165(2):133-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2012.10.017
Tamburino, Corrado ; Capranzano, Piera ; Capodanno, Davide ; Dangas, George ; Zimarino, Marco ; Bass, Theodore A. ; Mehran, Roxana ; Antoniucci, David ; Colombo, Antonio ; La Manna, Alessio ; Di Salvo, Maria E. ; Stone, Gregg W. / Percutaneous recanalization of chronic total occlusions : Wherein lies the body of proof?. In: American Heart Journal. 2013 ; Vol. 165, No. 2. pp. 133-142.
@article{8281cf347de7429a9125b93ad0b652d9,
title = "Percutaneous recanalization of chronic total occlusions: Wherein lies the body of proof?",
abstract = "Although interventional technology and skills have markedly advanced, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO) lesions remains challenging. Indeed, CTO PCI is technically complex, carries the potential for a relatively high likelihood of failure and acute complications, and requires specifically skilled operators and a demanding use of resources. In addition, controversy persists surrounding appropriate indications for attempting CTO revascularization. Finally, there is a wide uncertainty on the actual benefits achieved with successful CTO recanalization. A growing number of studies have reported procedural results and/or assessed functional effects and long-term clinical outcomes of CTO PCI. We therefore sought to review and critically appraise the evidence base for procedural outcomes and potential clinical benefits of CTO PCI.",
author = "Corrado Tamburino and Piera Capranzano and Davide Capodanno and George Dangas and Marco Zimarino and Bass, {Theodore A.} and Roxana Mehran and David Antoniucci and Antonio Colombo and {La Manna}, Alessio and {Di Salvo}, {Maria E.} and Stone, {Gregg W.}",
year = "2013",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.ahj.2012.10.017",
language = "English",
volume = "165",
pages = "133--142",
journal = "American Heart Journal",
issn = "0002-8703",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Percutaneous recanalization of chronic total occlusions

T2 - Wherein lies the body of proof?

AU - Tamburino, Corrado

AU - Capranzano, Piera

AU - Capodanno, Davide

AU - Dangas, George

AU - Zimarino, Marco

AU - Bass, Theodore A.

AU - Mehran, Roxana

AU - Antoniucci, David

AU - Colombo, Antonio

AU - La Manna, Alessio

AU - Di Salvo, Maria E.

AU - Stone, Gregg W.

PY - 2013/2

Y1 - 2013/2

N2 - Although interventional technology and skills have markedly advanced, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO) lesions remains challenging. Indeed, CTO PCI is technically complex, carries the potential for a relatively high likelihood of failure and acute complications, and requires specifically skilled operators and a demanding use of resources. In addition, controversy persists surrounding appropriate indications for attempting CTO revascularization. Finally, there is a wide uncertainty on the actual benefits achieved with successful CTO recanalization. A growing number of studies have reported procedural results and/or assessed functional effects and long-term clinical outcomes of CTO PCI. We therefore sought to review and critically appraise the evidence base for procedural outcomes and potential clinical benefits of CTO PCI.

AB - Although interventional technology and skills have markedly advanced, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO) lesions remains challenging. Indeed, CTO PCI is technically complex, carries the potential for a relatively high likelihood of failure and acute complications, and requires specifically skilled operators and a demanding use of resources. In addition, controversy persists surrounding appropriate indications for attempting CTO revascularization. Finally, there is a wide uncertainty on the actual benefits achieved with successful CTO recanalization. A growing number of studies have reported procedural results and/or assessed functional effects and long-term clinical outcomes of CTO PCI. We therefore sought to review and critically appraise the evidence base for procedural outcomes and potential clinical benefits of CTO PCI.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872835075&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84872835075&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.10.017

DO - 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.10.017

M3 - Article

C2 - 23351815

AN - SCOPUS:84872835075

VL - 165

SP - 133

EP - 142

JO - American Heart Journal

JF - American Heart Journal

SN - 0002-8703

IS - 2

ER -