Percutaneous tibial nerve neuromodulation is well tolerated in children and effective for treating refractory vesical dysfunction

M. De Gennaro, M. L. Capitanucci, P. Mastracci, M. Silveri, C. Gatti, G. Mosiello

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

58 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: We evaluated pain tolerability and the preliminary results of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) in children with unresponsive lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Materials and Methods: A total of 23 children 4 to 17 years old with LUTS refractory to conventional treatment underwent PTNS at 12, 30-minute weekly sessions. Ten patients had idiopathic overactive bladder, 7 were in nonneurogenic urinary retention and 6 had neuropathic bladder. Ten children were carefully evaluated for pain during needle insertion and electrical stimulation using certain scoring systems, namely the faces pain rating scale, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario pain scale, visual analogue scale and Questionario Italiano del Dolore. Evaluation was done at the first, sixth and last sessions. An anxiety-depression test was administered. All 23 children underwent clinical and urodynamic evaluation before and after treatment. Results: All except 1 patient completed treatment. An anxious-depressive trait was found in 7 of 10 children/parents on anxiety-depression testing. Regarding pain, the faces pain rating scale never showed the severe pain face, the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario scale showed signs of pain at the beginning of each stimulation but not at the end, and the visual analog scale generally showed a low score with a further decrease during the first (p = 0.05), sixth (p = 0.03) and twelfth (p = 0.02) sessions. The Questionario Italiano del Dolore score was significantly related to the affective component of pain (p = 0.002) and it decreased between the first and last sessions. The 10 children with overactive bladder had symptom improvement in 80%, incontinence was cured in 5 of 9 and urodynamics showed normalization of cystometric bladder capacity in 62.5% with no more unstable contractions in those who became continent. Symptoms improved in 71% of the children in urinary retention. One of 3 and 4 of 7 patients had incontinence and post-void residual urine cured, respectively. Urodynamics showed an improved detrusor pressure at maximum flow (p = 0.009) and flow rate (p = 0.005). Symptoms and urodynamics did not significantly change in the neuropathic bladder group. Conclusions: PTNS is safe, minimally painful and feasible in children. It seems helpful for treating refractive nonneurogenic LUTS.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1911-1913
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume171
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2004

Fingerprint

Tibial Nerve
Urinary Bladder
Urodynamics
Pain
Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
Facial Pain
Overactive Urinary Bladder
Neurogenic Urinary Bladder
Urinary Retention
Ontario
Visual Analog Scale
Anxiety
Depression
Electric Stimulation
Needles
Therapeutics
Parents
Urine
Pressure

Keywords

  • Bladder
  • Pain
  • Transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Percutaneous tibial nerve neuromodulation is well tolerated in children and effective for treating refractory vesical dysfunction. / De Gennaro, M.; Capitanucci, M. L.; Mastracci, P.; Silveri, M.; Gatti, C.; Mosiello, G.

In: Journal of Urology, Vol. 171, No. 5, 05.2004, p. 1911-1913.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9405d30501114d5c95495a24bbc0cc3f,
title = "Percutaneous tibial nerve neuromodulation is well tolerated in children and effective for treating refractory vesical dysfunction",
abstract = "Purpose: We evaluated pain tolerability and the preliminary results of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) in children with unresponsive lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Materials and Methods: A total of 23 children 4 to 17 years old with LUTS refractory to conventional treatment underwent PTNS at 12, 30-minute weekly sessions. Ten patients had idiopathic overactive bladder, 7 were in nonneurogenic urinary retention and 6 had neuropathic bladder. Ten children were carefully evaluated for pain during needle insertion and electrical stimulation using certain scoring systems, namely the faces pain rating scale, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario pain scale, visual analogue scale and Questionario Italiano del Dolore. Evaluation was done at the first, sixth and last sessions. An anxiety-depression test was administered. All 23 children underwent clinical and urodynamic evaluation before and after treatment. Results: All except 1 patient completed treatment. An anxious-depressive trait was found in 7 of 10 children/parents on anxiety-depression testing. Regarding pain, the faces pain rating scale never showed the severe pain face, the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario scale showed signs of pain at the beginning of each stimulation but not at the end, and the visual analog scale generally showed a low score with a further decrease during the first (p = 0.05), sixth (p = 0.03) and twelfth (p = 0.02) sessions. The Questionario Italiano del Dolore score was significantly related to the affective component of pain (p = 0.002) and it decreased between the first and last sessions. The 10 children with overactive bladder had symptom improvement in 80{\%}, incontinence was cured in 5 of 9 and urodynamics showed normalization of cystometric bladder capacity in 62.5{\%} with no more unstable contractions in those who became continent. Symptoms improved in 71{\%} of the children in urinary retention. One of 3 and 4 of 7 patients had incontinence and post-void residual urine cured, respectively. Urodynamics showed an improved detrusor pressure at maximum flow (p = 0.009) and flow rate (p = 0.005). Symptoms and urodynamics did not significantly change in the neuropathic bladder group. Conclusions: PTNS is safe, minimally painful and feasible in children. It seems helpful for treating refractive nonneurogenic LUTS.",
keywords = "Bladder, Pain, Transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation",
author = "{De Gennaro}, M. and Capitanucci, {M. L.} and P. Mastracci and M. Silveri and C. Gatti and G. Mosiello",
year = "2004",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1097/01.ju.0000119961.58222.86",
language = "English",
volume = "171",
pages = "1911--1913",
journal = "Journal of Urology",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Percutaneous tibial nerve neuromodulation is well tolerated in children and effective for treating refractory vesical dysfunction

AU - De Gennaro, M.

AU - Capitanucci, M. L.

AU - Mastracci, P.

AU - Silveri, M.

AU - Gatti, C.

AU - Mosiello, G.

PY - 2004/5

Y1 - 2004/5

N2 - Purpose: We evaluated pain tolerability and the preliminary results of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) in children with unresponsive lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Materials and Methods: A total of 23 children 4 to 17 years old with LUTS refractory to conventional treatment underwent PTNS at 12, 30-minute weekly sessions. Ten patients had idiopathic overactive bladder, 7 were in nonneurogenic urinary retention and 6 had neuropathic bladder. Ten children were carefully evaluated for pain during needle insertion and electrical stimulation using certain scoring systems, namely the faces pain rating scale, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario pain scale, visual analogue scale and Questionario Italiano del Dolore. Evaluation was done at the first, sixth and last sessions. An anxiety-depression test was administered. All 23 children underwent clinical and urodynamic evaluation before and after treatment. Results: All except 1 patient completed treatment. An anxious-depressive trait was found in 7 of 10 children/parents on anxiety-depression testing. Regarding pain, the faces pain rating scale never showed the severe pain face, the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario scale showed signs of pain at the beginning of each stimulation but not at the end, and the visual analog scale generally showed a low score with a further decrease during the first (p = 0.05), sixth (p = 0.03) and twelfth (p = 0.02) sessions. The Questionario Italiano del Dolore score was significantly related to the affective component of pain (p = 0.002) and it decreased between the first and last sessions. The 10 children with overactive bladder had symptom improvement in 80%, incontinence was cured in 5 of 9 and urodynamics showed normalization of cystometric bladder capacity in 62.5% with no more unstable contractions in those who became continent. Symptoms improved in 71% of the children in urinary retention. One of 3 and 4 of 7 patients had incontinence and post-void residual urine cured, respectively. Urodynamics showed an improved detrusor pressure at maximum flow (p = 0.009) and flow rate (p = 0.005). Symptoms and urodynamics did not significantly change in the neuropathic bladder group. Conclusions: PTNS is safe, minimally painful and feasible in children. It seems helpful for treating refractive nonneurogenic LUTS.

AB - Purpose: We evaluated pain tolerability and the preliminary results of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) in children with unresponsive lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Materials and Methods: A total of 23 children 4 to 17 years old with LUTS refractory to conventional treatment underwent PTNS at 12, 30-minute weekly sessions. Ten patients had idiopathic overactive bladder, 7 were in nonneurogenic urinary retention and 6 had neuropathic bladder. Ten children were carefully evaluated for pain during needle insertion and electrical stimulation using certain scoring systems, namely the faces pain rating scale, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario pain scale, visual analogue scale and Questionario Italiano del Dolore. Evaluation was done at the first, sixth and last sessions. An anxiety-depression test was administered. All 23 children underwent clinical and urodynamic evaluation before and after treatment. Results: All except 1 patient completed treatment. An anxious-depressive trait was found in 7 of 10 children/parents on anxiety-depression testing. Regarding pain, the faces pain rating scale never showed the severe pain face, the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario scale showed signs of pain at the beginning of each stimulation but not at the end, and the visual analog scale generally showed a low score with a further decrease during the first (p = 0.05), sixth (p = 0.03) and twelfth (p = 0.02) sessions. The Questionario Italiano del Dolore score was significantly related to the affective component of pain (p = 0.002) and it decreased between the first and last sessions. The 10 children with overactive bladder had symptom improvement in 80%, incontinence was cured in 5 of 9 and urodynamics showed normalization of cystometric bladder capacity in 62.5% with no more unstable contractions in those who became continent. Symptoms improved in 71% of the children in urinary retention. One of 3 and 4 of 7 patients had incontinence and post-void residual urine cured, respectively. Urodynamics showed an improved detrusor pressure at maximum flow (p = 0.009) and flow rate (p = 0.005). Symptoms and urodynamics did not significantly change in the neuropathic bladder group. Conclusions: PTNS is safe, minimally painful and feasible in children. It seems helpful for treating refractive nonneurogenic LUTS.

KW - Bladder

KW - Pain

KW - Transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=13444308912&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=13444308912&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.ju.0000119961.58222.86

DO - 10.1097/01.ju.0000119961.58222.86

M3 - Article

VL - 171

SP - 1911

EP - 1913

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 5

ER -