Performance comparison of a state-of-the-art neuro-SPET scanner and a dedicated neuro-PET scanner

Dale L. Bailey, Felicia Zito, Maria Carla Gilardi, Anna Rita Savi, Ferruccio Fazio, Terry Jones

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The physical performances of two current state-of-the-art scanners dedicated to functional imaging of the brain, one a single-photon emission tomography (SPET) scanner and the other a positron emission tomography (PET) scanner, have been compared under identical conditions. The aim of the study was to compare the capabilities of the devices under conditions resembling the routine clinical environment, as well as to consider other issues such as radiation burden for some common investigations. Both systems have slightly less than 11-cm axial fields of view. The PET system can be operated in a septa-less (3D) mode as well as conventionally with septa (2D). The spatial resolution of both devices was less than 8 mm in all dimensions in scattering media. On average, the PET scanner's resolution was approximately 10%-15% better than the SPET system. Energy resolution on the SPET system was superior due the scintillator used [Nal(Tl)]. Sensitivity in air with a line source on the PET system was found to be ∼150 times greater in 3D and ∼25 times greater in 2D than with the SPET system. A normal subject was studied on each system in an attempt to obtain the highest quality data possible for a subjective comparison. It is clear that, while PET retains the advantages of more desirable radiopharmaceuticals and higher sensitivity, the quality obtainable from SPET devices has improved markedly. SPET may prove as useful for many clinical investigations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)381-387
Number of pages7
JournalEuropean Journal Of Nuclear Medicine
Volume21
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 1994

Fingerprint

Photons
Positron-Emission Tomography
Tomography
Equipment and Supplies
Functional Neuroimaging
Radiopharmaceuticals
Air
Radiation

Keywords

  • Brain imaging
  • Positron emission tomography scanner
  • Single-photon emission tomography scanner

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Performance comparison of a state-of-the-art neuro-SPET scanner and a dedicated neuro-PET scanner. / Bailey, Dale L.; Zito, Felicia; Gilardi, Maria Carla; Savi, Anna Rita; Fazio, Ferruccio; Jones, Terry.

In: European Journal Of Nuclear Medicine, Vol. 21, No. 5, 05.1994, p. 381-387.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bailey, Dale L. ; Zito, Felicia ; Gilardi, Maria Carla ; Savi, Anna Rita ; Fazio, Ferruccio ; Jones, Terry. / Performance comparison of a state-of-the-art neuro-SPET scanner and a dedicated neuro-PET scanner. In: European Journal Of Nuclear Medicine. 1994 ; Vol. 21, No. 5. pp. 381-387.
@article{53229b14d3de4361bbc6a5ed449dc4b3,
title = "Performance comparison of a state-of-the-art neuro-SPET scanner and a dedicated neuro-PET scanner",
abstract = "The physical performances of two current state-of-the-art scanners dedicated to functional imaging of the brain, one a single-photon emission tomography (SPET) scanner and the other a positron emission tomography (PET) scanner, have been compared under identical conditions. The aim of the study was to compare the capabilities of the devices under conditions resembling the routine clinical environment, as well as to consider other issues such as radiation burden for some common investigations. Both systems have slightly less than 11-cm axial fields of view. The PET system can be operated in a septa-less (3D) mode as well as conventionally with septa (2D). The spatial resolution of both devices was less than 8 mm in all dimensions in scattering media. On average, the PET scanner's resolution was approximately 10{\%}-15{\%} better than the SPET system. Energy resolution on the SPET system was superior due the scintillator used [Nal(Tl)]. Sensitivity in air with a line source on the PET system was found to be ∼150 times greater in 3D and ∼25 times greater in 2D than with the SPET system. A normal subject was studied on each system in an attempt to obtain the highest quality data possible for a subjective comparison. It is clear that, while PET retains the advantages of more desirable radiopharmaceuticals and higher sensitivity, the quality obtainable from SPET devices has improved markedly. SPET may prove as useful for many clinical investigations.",
keywords = "Brain imaging, Positron emission tomography scanner, Single-photon emission tomography scanner",
author = "Bailey, {Dale L.} and Felicia Zito and Gilardi, {Maria Carla} and Savi, {Anna Rita} and Ferruccio Fazio and Terry Jones",
year = "1994",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1007/BF00171411",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "381--387",
journal = "European Journal of Pediatrics",
issn = "0340-6199",
publisher = "Springer Berlin Heidelberg",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Performance comparison of a state-of-the-art neuro-SPET scanner and a dedicated neuro-PET scanner

AU - Bailey, Dale L.

AU - Zito, Felicia

AU - Gilardi, Maria Carla

AU - Savi, Anna Rita

AU - Fazio, Ferruccio

AU - Jones, Terry

PY - 1994/5

Y1 - 1994/5

N2 - The physical performances of two current state-of-the-art scanners dedicated to functional imaging of the brain, one a single-photon emission tomography (SPET) scanner and the other a positron emission tomography (PET) scanner, have been compared under identical conditions. The aim of the study was to compare the capabilities of the devices under conditions resembling the routine clinical environment, as well as to consider other issues such as radiation burden for some common investigations. Both systems have slightly less than 11-cm axial fields of view. The PET system can be operated in a septa-less (3D) mode as well as conventionally with septa (2D). The spatial resolution of both devices was less than 8 mm in all dimensions in scattering media. On average, the PET scanner's resolution was approximately 10%-15% better than the SPET system. Energy resolution on the SPET system was superior due the scintillator used [Nal(Tl)]. Sensitivity in air with a line source on the PET system was found to be ∼150 times greater in 3D and ∼25 times greater in 2D than with the SPET system. A normal subject was studied on each system in an attempt to obtain the highest quality data possible for a subjective comparison. It is clear that, while PET retains the advantages of more desirable radiopharmaceuticals and higher sensitivity, the quality obtainable from SPET devices has improved markedly. SPET may prove as useful for many clinical investigations.

AB - The physical performances of two current state-of-the-art scanners dedicated to functional imaging of the brain, one a single-photon emission tomography (SPET) scanner and the other a positron emission tomography (PET) scanner, have been compared under identical conditions. The aim of the study was to compare the capabilities of the devices under conditions resembling the routine clinical environment, as well as to consider other issues such as radiation burden for some common investigations. Both systems have slightly less than 11-cm axial fields of view. The PET system can be operated in a septa-less (3D) mode as well as conventionally with septa (2D). The spatial resolution of both devices was less than 8 mm in all dimensions in scattering media. On average, the PET scanner's resolution was approximately 10%-15% better than the SPET system. Energy resolution on the SPET system was superior due the scintillator used [Nal(Tl)]. Sensitivity in air with a line source on the PET system was found to be ∼150 times greater in 3D and ∼25 times greater in 2D than with the SPET system. A normal subject was studied on each system in an attempt to obtain the highest quality data possible for a subjective comparison. It is clear that, while PET retains the advantages of more desirable radiopharmaceuticals and higher sensitivity, the quality obtainable from SPET devices has improved markedly. SPET may prove as useful for many clinical investigations.

KW - Brain imaging

KW - Positron emission tomography scanner

KW - Single-photon emission tomography scanner

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028210725&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028210725&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF00171411

DO - 10.1007/BF00171411

M3 - Article

C2 - 8062841

AN - SCOPUS:0028210725

VL - 21

SP - 381

EP - 387

JO - European Journal of Pediatrics

JF - European Journal of Pediatrics

SN - 0340-6199

IS - 5

ER -