TY - JOUR
T1 - Peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization in patients with primary refractory lymphoma or at first relapse
T2 - Comparison with patients at diagnosis and impact on clinical outcome
AU - Tarella, C.
AU - Castellino, C.
AU - Cherasco, C.
AU - Bondesan, P.
AU - Giaretta, F.
AU - Corradini, P.
AU - Caracciolo, D.
AU - Gavarotti, P.
AU - Pileri, A.
PY - 1997
Y1 - 1997
N2 - Peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) mobilization was evaluated in 53 patients receiving the high-dose sequential (HDS) regimen: 27 had non- Hodgkin's lymphoma or Hodgkin's disease, primary refractory or at first relapse, 26 had non-Hodgkin's lymphoma at diagnosis. Mobilization was assessed following either 7 g/m2 cyclophosphamide (48 patients) or 2 g/m2 etoposide, both followed by G-CSF (filgrastim) at 5 μg/kg/d. PBPC mobilization was significantly higher in patients at diagnosis compared to refractory/relapsed patients (median peak values of circulating CFU-GM: 25 209/ml v 4270/ml, P <0.0001 and CD34+ cells: 286/μl v 47/μl, P <0.0001). All patients receiving HDS as up-front treatment mobilized enough PBPC for an autograft, often requiring a single leukapheresis; whereas only 15 patients under salvage treatment with FIDS were able to complete PBPC autograft. Bone marrow (BM) cells, alone or with PBPC, were needed in six patients, and autograft could not be performed in six patients. Among refractory/relapsed patients, those having a high PBPC mobilization experienced a significantly longer FFS compared to those who had not; autograft completion also significantly enhanced EFS. Thus, the use of an effective mobilizing protocol does not ensure adequate PBPC mobilization in moderately pretreated patients; low mobilization must be considered as an early sign of poor outcome in patients receiving a high-dose salvage programme.
AB - Peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) mobilization was evaluated in 53 patients receiving the high-dose sequential (HDS) regimen: 27 had non- Hodgkin's lymphoma or Hodgkin's disease, primary refractory or at first relapse, 26 had non-Hodgkin's lymphoma at diagnosis. Mobilization was assessed following either 7 g/m2 cyclophosphamide (48 patients) or 2 g/m2 etoposide, both followed by G-CSF (filgrastim) at 5 μg/kg/d. PBPC mobilization was significantly higher in patients at diagnosis compared to refractory/relapsed patients (median peak values of circulating CFU-GM: 25 209/ml v 4270/ml, P <0.0001 and CD34+ cells: 286/μl v 47/μl, P <0.0001). All patients receiving HDS as up-front treatment mobilized enough PBPC for an autograft, often requiring a single leukapheresis; whereas only 15 patients under salvage treatment with FIDS were able to complete PBPC autograft. Bone marrow (BM) cells, alone or with PBPC, were needed in six patients, and autograft could not be performed in six patients. Among refractory/relapsed patients, those having a high PBPC mobilization experienced a significantly longer FFS compared to those who had not; autograft completion also significantly enhanced EFS. Thus, the use of an effective mobilizing protocol does not ensure adequate PBPC mobilization in moderately pretreated patients; low mobilization must be considered as an early sign of poor outcome in patients receiving a high-dose salvage programme.
KW - Lymphoid malignancies
KW - PBPC autograft
KW - Progenitor mobilization
KW - Salvage treatment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030775816&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030775816&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 9359500
AN - SCOPUS:0030775816
VL - 99
SP - 41
EP - 46
JO - British Journal of Haematology
JF - British Journal of Haematology
SN - 0007-1048
IS - 1
ER -