Periprosthetic mineralization changes around femoral stems: A prospective 12-month study with DEXA

Marco Galli, Antonio Leone, Francesco Ciro Tamburrelli, Tommaso Pirronti, Angelo Gabriele Aulisa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The objective was to evaluate bone mineral density (BMD) changes around the proximal femur after implantation of two different anatomical stems. Materials and methods: Thirty-six patients (19 women and 17 men) who underwent total hip replacement were recruited. A Bihapro stem was implanted in 23 patients (with a mean age of 60.9 years) and a Citation stem in 13 patients (with a mean age of 59.7 years). All patients underwent serial radiography of the affected hip (follow-up time: 12 months). Baseline periprosthetic and overall BMD were measured with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) 1 week and 12 months after hip replacement. Regions of interest (ROIs) were defined according to Gruen's system (ROIs 1-7). Results: All stems were classified as radiographically stable. Bone ongrowth (spot welds) was present in zones 1 and 2 in all patients with the Bihapro stem. The distribution of baseline densities was very similar in the two groups of patients. In Bihapro implants a significant increment of mineralisation was present in ROI 1 after 1 year; ROIs 2 to 7 showed no density variation. The following observations were made regarding the Citation implants: no increment in density was shown in ROI 1; the differences in densities among the ROIs were significant after 1 year in the global evaluation (p = 0.004); the comparison between the single ROIs showed decalcification in ROIs 2 and 7 and a density increment in ROI 5. Conclusions: Bihapro stems appear to achieve adequate proximal fixation, avoiding the "stress shielding" phenomenon.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)723-729
Number of pages7
JournalSkeletal Radiology
Volume37
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2008

Fingerprint

Photon Absorptiometry
Thigh
Bone Density
Hip
Hip Replacement Arthroplasties
Radiography
Femur
Bone and Bones

Keywords

  • Hip
  • Hip arthroplasty
  • Hip dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
  • Hip radiography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Periprosthetic mineralization changes around femoral stems : A prospective 12-month study with DEXA. / Galli, Marco; Leone, Antonio; Tamburrelli, Francesco Ciro; Pirronti, Tommaso; Aulisa, Angelo Gabriele.

In: Skeletal Radiology, Vol. 37, No. 8, 08.2008, p. 723-729.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Galli, Marco ; Leone, Antonio ; Tamburrelli, Francesco Ciro ; Pirronti, Tommaso ; Aulisa, Angelo Gabriele. / Periprosthetic mineralization changes around femoral stems : A prospective 12-month study with DEXA. In: Skeletal Radiology. 2008 ; Vol. 37, No. 8. pp. 723-729.
@article{4e9df2fe597b43fcb7aa07a2885e4743,
title = "Periprosthetic mineralization changes around femoral stems: A prospective 12-month study with DEXA",
abstract = "Objective: The objective was to evaluate bone mineral density (BMD) changes around the proximal femur after implantation of two different anatomical stems. Materials and methods: Thirty-six patients (19 women and 17 men) who underwent total hip replacement were recruited. A Bihapro stem was implanted in 23 patients (with a mean age of 60.9 years) and a Citation stem in 13 patients (with a mean age of 59.7 years). All patients underwent serial radiography of the affected hip (follow-up time: 12 months). Baseline periprosthetic and overall BMD were measured with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) 1 week and 12 months after hip replacement. Regions of interest (ROIs) were defined according to Gruen's system (ROIs 1-7). Results: All stems were classified as radiographically stable. Bone ongrowth (spot welds) was present in zones 1 and 2 in all patients with the Bihapro stem. The distribution of baseline densities was very similar in the two groups of patients. In Bihapro implants a significant increment of mineralisation was present in ROI 1 after 1 year; ROIs 2 to 7 showed no density variation. The following observations were made regarding the Citation implants: no increment in density was shown in ROI 1; the differences in densities among the ROIs were significant after 1 year in the global evaluation (p = 0.004); the comparison between the single ROIs showed decalcification in ROIs 2 and 7 and a density increment in ROI 5. Conclusions: Bihapro stems appear to achieve adequate proximal fixation, avoiding the {"}stress shielding{"} phenomenon.",
keywords = "Hip, Hip arthroplasty, Hip dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, Hip radiography",
author = "Marco Galli and Antonio Leone and Tamburrelli, {Francesco Ciro} and Tommaso Pirronti and Aulisa, {Angelo Gabriele}",
year = "2008",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1007/s00256-008-0482-z",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "723--729",
journal = "Skeletal Radiology",
issn = "0364-2348",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Periprosthetic mineralization changes around femoral stems

T2 - A prospective 12-month study with DEXA

AU - Galli, Marco

AU - Leone, Antonio

AU - Tamburrelli, Francesco Ciro

AU - Pirronti, Tommaso

AU - Aulisa, Angelo Gabriele

PY - 2008/8

Y1 - 2008/8

N2 - Objective: The objective was to evaluate bone mineral density (BMD) changes around the proximal femur after implantation of two different anatomical stems. Materials and methods: Thirty-six patients (19 women and 17 men) who underwent total hip replacement were recruited. A Bihapro stem was implanted in 23 patients (with a mean age of 60.9 years) and a Citation stem in 13 patients (with a mean age of 59.7 years). All patients underwent serial radiography of the affected hip (follow-up time: 12 months). Baseline periprosthetic and overall BMD were measured with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) 1 week and 12 months after hip replacement. Regions of interest (ROIs) were defined according to Gruen's system (ROIs 1-7). Results: All stems were classified as radiographically stable. Bone ongrowth (spot welds) was present in zones 1 and 2 in all patients with the Bihapro stem. The distribution of baseline densities was very similar in the two groups of patients. In Bihapro implants a significant increment of mineralisation was present in ROI 1 after 1 year; ROIs 2 to 7 showed no density variation. The following observations were made regarding the Citation implants: no increment in density was shown in ROI 1; the differences in densities among the ROIs were significant after 1 year in the global evaluation (p = 0.004); the comparison between the single ROIs showed decalcification in ROIs 2 and 7 and a density increment in ROI 5. Conclusions: Bihapro stems appear to achieve adequate proximal fixation, avoiding the "stress shielding" phenomenon.

AB - Objective: The objective was to evaluate bone mineral density (BMD) changes around the proximal femur after implantation of two different anatomical stems. Materials and methods: Thirty-six patients (19 women and 17 men) who underwent total hip replacement were recruited. A Bihapro stem was implanted in 23 patients (with a mean age of 60.9 years) and a Citation stem in 13 patients (with a mean age of 59.7 years). All patients underwent serial radiography of the affected hip (follow-up time: 12 months). Baseline periprosthetic and overall BMD were measured with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) 1 week and 12 months after hip replacement. Regions of interest (ROIs) were defined according to Gruen's system (ROIs 1-7). Results: All stems were classified as radiographically stable. Bone ongrowth (spot welds) was present in zones 1 and 2 in all patients with the Bihapro stem. The distribution of baseline densities was very similar in the two groups of patients. In Bihapro implants a significant increment of mineralisation was present in ROI 1 after 1 year; ROIs 2 to 7 showed no density variation. The following observations were made regarding the Citation implants: no increment in density was shown in ROI 1; the differences in densities among the ROIs were significant after 1 year in the global evaluation (p = 0.004); the comparison between the single ROIs showed decalcification in ROIs 2 and 7 and a density increment in ROI 5. Conclusions: Bihapro stems appear to achieve adequate proximal fixation, avoiding the "stress shielding" phenomenon.

KW - Hip

KW - Hip arthroplasty

KW - Hip dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

KW - Hip radiography

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=46649109521&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=46649109521&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00256-008-0482-z

DO - 10.1007/s00256-008-0482-z

M3 - Article

C2 - 18478226

AN - SCOPUS:46649109521

VL - 37

SP - 723

EP - 729

JO - Skeletal Radiology

JF - Skeletal Radiology

SN - 0364-2348

IS - 8

ER -