PET quantification: Strategies for partial volume correction

V. Bettinardi; I. Castiglioni; E. De Bernardi; M. C. Gilardi

doi:10.1007/s40336-014-0066-y

PET quantification: Strategies for partial volume correction

V. Bettinardi, I. Castiglioni, E. De Bernardi, M. C. Gilardi

IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Despite the continuous evolution of positron emission tomography (PET) technology, the spatial resolution (SR) of PET images remains poor (4-6 mm) compared with that of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	199-218
Number of pages	20
Journal	Clinical and Translational Imaging
Volume	2
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s40336-014-0066-y
Publication status	Published - 2014

Keywords

Partial volume effect
PET
Spatial resolution

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Access to Document

10.1007/s40336-014-0066-y

Cite this

@article{7a34712f6ced4a37982c882f25c4423e,

title = "PET quantification: Strategies for partial volume correction",

abstract = "Despite the continuous evolution of positron emission tomography (PET) technology, the spatial resolution (SR) of PET images remains poor (4-6 mm) compared with that of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (",

keywords = "Partial volume effect, PET, Spatial resolution",

author = "V. Bettinardi and I. Castiglioni and {De Bernardi}, E. and Gilardi, {M. C.}",

year = "2014",

doi = "10.1007/s40336-014-0066-y",

language = "English",

volume = "2",

pages = "199--218",

journal = "Clinical and Translational Imaging",

issn = "2281-5872",

publisher = "Springer-Verlag Italia s.r.l.",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - PET quantification

T2 - Strategies for partial volume correction

AU - Bettinardi, V.

AU - Castiglioni, I.

AU - De Bernardi, E.

AU - Gilardi, M. C.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Despite the continuous evolution of positron emission tomography (PET) technology, the spatial resolution (SR) of PET images remains poor (4-6 mm) compared with that of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (

AB - Despite the continuous evolution of positron emission tomography (PET) technology, the spatial resolution (SR) of PET images remains poor (4-6 mm) compared with that of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (

KW - Partial volume effect

KW - PET

KW - Spatial resolution

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925504208&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925504208&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s40336-014-0066-y

DO - 10.1007/s40336-014-0066-y

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84925504208

VL - 2

SP - 199

EP - 218

JO - Clinical and Translational Imaging

JF - Clinical and Translational Imaging

SN - 2281-5872

IS - 3

ER -

PET quantification: Strategies for partial volume correction

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this