PHYSICAL CHARACTERISATION OF FOUR DIFFERENT COMMERCIAL DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS SYSTEMS

O. Ortenzia, R. Rossi, M. Bertolini, A. Nitrosi, C. Ghetti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of this article was to characterise the performance of four different digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) systems in terms of dose and image quality parameters. One of them, GE Pristina, has never been tested before. Average glandular doses were measured both in DBT and 2D full field digital mammography mode. Several phantoms were employed to perform signal difference to noise ratio, slice sensitivity profile, slice to slice incrementation, chest wall offset, z-axis geometry, artefact spread function, low contrast detectability, contrast detail evaluations, image uniformity and in-plane MTF in chest wall-nipple and in tube-travel directions. There are many differences in DBT systems explored: the angular range, detector type, reconstruction algorithms, and the presence or not of the grid. Even if it is not simple to calculate a global figure of merit, the analysis of all the collected data can be useful in a contest of a quality assurance program to define a set of values that could be used as benchmarks.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)277-289
Number of pages13
JournalRadiation Protection Dosimetry
Volume181
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 1 2018

Fingerprint

Mammography
breast
chest
Thoracic Wall
dosage
assurance
modulation transfer function
Benchmarking
figure of merit
travel
Nipples
artifacts
Signal-To-Noise Ratio
grids
Artifacts
tubes
evaluation
sensitivity
detectors
profiles

Cite this

PHYSICAL CHARACTERISATION OF FOUR DIFFERENT COMMERCIAL DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS SYSTEMS. / Ortenzia, O.; Rossi, R.; Bertolini, M.; Nitrosi, A.; Ghetti, C.

In: Radiation Protection Dosimetry, Vol. 181, No. 3, 01.10.2018, p. 277-289.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{698e72869807410da4eb52b294cc7bff,
title = "PHYSICAL CHARACTERISATION OF FOUR DIFFERENT COMMERCIAL DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS SYSTEMS",
abstract = "The aim of this article was to characterise the performance of four different digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) systems in terms of dose and image quality parameters. One of them, GE Pristina, has never been tested before. Average glandular doses were measured both in DBT and 2D full field digital mammography mode. Several phantoms were employed to perform signal difference to noise ratio, slice sensitivity profile, slice to slice incrementation, chest wall offset, z-axis geometry, artefact spread function, low contrast detectability, contrast detail evaluations, image uniformity and in-plane MTF in chest wall-nipple and in tube-travel directions. There are many differences in DBT systems explored: the angular range, detector type, reconstruction algorithms, and the presence or not of the grid. Even if it is not simple to calculate a global figure of merit, the analysis of all the collected data can be useful in a contest of a quality assurance program to define a set of values that could be used as benchmarks.",
author = "O. Ortenzia and R. Rossi and M. Bertolini and A. Nitrosi and C. Ghetti",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/rpd/ncy024",
language = "English",
volume = "181",
pages = "277--289",
journal = "Radiation Protection Dosimetry",
issn = "0144-8420",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - PHYSICAL CHARACTERISATION OF FOUR DIFFERENT COMMERCIAL DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS SYSTEMS

AU - Ortenzia, O.

AU - Rossi, R.

AU - Bertolini, M.

AU - Nitrosi, A.

AU - Ghetti, C.

PY - 2018/10/1

Y1 - 2018/10/1

N2 - The aim of this article was to characterise the performance of four different digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) systems in terms of dose and image quality parameters. One of them, GE Pristina, has never been tested before. Average glandular doses were measured both in DBT and 2D full field digital mammography mode. Several phantoms were employed to perform signal difference to noise ratio, slice sensitivity profile, slice to slice incrementation, chest wall offset, z-axis geometry, artefact spread function, low contrast detectability, contrast detail evaluations, image uniformity and in-plane MTF in chest wall-nipple and in tube-travel directions. There are many differences in DBT systems explored: the angular range, detector type, reconstruction algorithms, and the presence or not of the grid. Even if it is not simple to calculate a global figure of merit, the analysis of all the collected data can be useful in a contest of a quality assurance program to define a set of values that could be used as benchmarks.

AB - The aim of this article was to characterise the performance of four different digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) systems in terms of dose and image quality parameters. One of them, GE Pristina, has never been tested before. Average glandular doses were measured both in DBT and 2D full field digital mammography mode. Several phantoms were employed to perform signal difference to noise ratio, slice sensitivity profile, slice to slice incrementation, chest wall offset, z-axis geometry, artefact spread function, low contrast detectability, contrast detail evaluations, image uniformity and in-plane MTF in chest wall-nipple and in tube-travel directions. There are many differences in DBT systems explored: the angular range, detector type, reconstruction algorithms, and the presence or not of the grid. Even if it is not simple to calculate a global figure of merit, the analysis of all the collected data can be useful in a contest of a quality assurance program to define a set of values that could be used as benchmarks.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055212221&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055212221&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/rpd/ncy024

DO - 10.1093/rpd/ncy024

M3 - Article

C2 - 29462366

AN - SCOPUS:85055212221

VL - 181

SP - 277

EP - 289

JO - Radiation Protection Dosimetry

JF - Radiation Protection Dosimetry

SN - 0144-8420

IS - 3

ER -