Physician-Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia: Emerging Issues From a Global Perspective

Charles L. Sprung, Margaret A. Somerville, Lukas Radbruch, Nathalie Steiner Collet, Gunnar Duttge, Jefferson P. Piva, Massimo Antonelli, Daniel P. Sulmasy, Willem Lemmens, E. Wesley Ely

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

: Medical professional societies have traditionally opposed physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia (PAS-E), but this opposition may be shifting. We present 5 reasons why physicians shouldn’t be involved in PAS-E. 1. Slippery slopes: There is evidence that safeguards in the Netherlands and Belgium are ineffective and violated, including administering lethal drugs without patient consent, absence of terminal illness, untreated psychiatric diagnoses, and nonreporting; 2. Lack of self-determination: Psychological and social motives characterize requests for PAS-E more than physical symptoms or rational choices; many requests disappear with improved symptom control and psychological support; 3. Inadequate palliative care: Better palliative care makes most patients physically comfortable. Many individuals requesting PAS-E don’t want to die but to escape their suffering. Adequate treatment for depression and pain decreases the desire for death; 4. Medical professionalism: PAS-E transgresses the inviolable rule that physicians heal and palliate suffering but never intentionally inflict death; 5. Differences between means and ends: Proeuthanasia advocates look to the ends (the patient’s death) and say the ends justify the means; opponents disagree and believe that killing patients to relieve suffering is different from allowing natural death and is not acceptable. Conclusions: Physicians have a duty to eliminate pain and suffering, not the person with the pain and suffering. Solutions for suffering lie in improving palliative care and social conditions and addressing the reasons for PAS-E requests. They should not include changing medical practice to allow PAS-E.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Palliative Care
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Assisted Suicide
Euthanasia
Psychological Stress
Palliative Care
Physicians
Pain
Psychology
Personal Autonomy
Medical Societies
Social Conditions
Belgium
Mental Disorders
Netherlands
Depression
Pharmaceutical Preparations

Keywords

  • autonomy
  • euthanasia
  • palliative care
  • professional–professional relationship
  • suicide/assisted suicide

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Sprung, C. L., Somerville, M. A., Radbruch, L., Collet, N. S., Duttge, G., Piva, J. P., ... Ely, E. W. (Accepted/In press). Physician-Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia: Emerging Issues From a Global Perspective. Journal of Palliative Care. https://doi.org/10.1177/0825859718777325

Physician-Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia : Emerging Issues From a Global Perspective. / Sprung, Charles L.; Somerville, Margaret A.; Radbruch, Lukas; Collet, Nathalie Steiner; Duttge, Gunnar; Piva, Jefferson P.; Antonelli, Massimo; Sulmasy, Daniel P.; Lemmens, Willem; Ely, E. Wesley.

In: Journal of Palliative Care, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sprung, CL, Somerville, MA, Radbruch, L, Collet, NS, Duttge, G, Piva, JP, Antonelli, M, Sulmasy, DP, Lemmens, W & Ely, EW 2018, 'Physician-Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia: Emerging Issues From a Global Perspective', Journal of Palliative Care. https://doi.org/10.1177/0825859718777325
Sprung, Charles L. ; Somerville, Margaret A. ; Radbruch, Lukas ; Collet, Nathalie Steiner ; Duttge, Gunnar ; Piva, Jefferson P. ; Antonelli, Massimo ; Sulmasy, Daniel P. ; Lemmens, Willem ; Ely, E. Wesley. / Physician-Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia : Emerging Issues From a Global Perspective. In: Journal of Palliative Care. 2018.
@article{f832442ded5045f28bb326c5a3c482a8,
title = "Physician-Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia: Emerging Issues From a Global Perspective",
abstract = ": Medical professional societies have traditionally opposed physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia (PAS-E), but this opposition may be shifting. We present 5 reasons why physicians shouldn’t be involved in PAS-E. 1. Slippery slopes: There is evidence that safeguards in the Netherlands and Belgium are ineffective and violated, including administering lethal drugs without patient consent, absence of terminal illness, untreated psychiatric diagnoses, and nonreporting; 2. Lack of self-determination: Psychological and social motives characterize requests for PAS-E more than physical symptoms or rational choices; many requests disappear with improved symptom control and psychological support; 3. Inadequate palliative care: Better palliative care makes most patients physically comfortable. Many individuals requesting PAS-E don’t want to die but to escape their suffering. Adequate treatment for depression and pain decreases the desire for death; 4. Medical professionalism: PAS-E transgresses the inviolable rule that physicians heal and palliate suffering but never intentionally inflict death; 5. Differences between means and ends: Proeuthanasia advocates look to the ends (the patient’s death) and say the ends justify the means; opponents disagree and believe that killing patients to relieve suffering is different from allowing natural death and is not acceptable. Conclusions: Physicians have a duty to eliminate pain and suffering, not the person with the pain and suffering. Solutions for suffering lie in improving palliative care and social conditions and addressing the reasons for PAS-E requests. They should not include changing medical practice to allow PAS-E.",
keywords = "autonomy, euthanasia, palliative care, professional–professional relationship, suicide/assisted suicide",
author = "Sprung, {Charles L.} and Somerville, {Margaret A.} and Lukas Radbruch and Collet, {Nathalie Steiner} and Gunnar Duttge and Piva, {Jefferson P.} and Massimo Antonelli and Sulmasy, {Daniel P.} and Willem Lemmens and Ely, {E. Wesley}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0825859718777325",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of Palliative Care",
issn = "0825-8597",
publisher = "Institut Universitaire de Geriatrie de Montreal",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Physician-Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia

T2 - Emerging Issues From a Global Perspective

AU - Sprung, Charles L.

AU - Somerville, Margaret A.

AU - Radbruch, Lukas

AU - Collet, Nathalie Steiner

AU - Duttge, Gunnar

AU - Piva, Jefferson P.

AU - Antonelli, Massimo

AU - Sulmasy, Daniel P.

AU - Lemmens, Willem

AU - Ely, E. Wesley

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - : Medical professional societies have traditionally opposed physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia (PAS-E), but this opposition may be shifting. We present 5 reasons why physicians shouldn’t be involved in PAS-E. 1. Slippery slopes: There is evidence that safeguards in the Netherlands and Belgium are ineffective and violated, including administering lethal drugs without patient consent, absence of terminal illness, untreated psychiatric diagnoses, and nonreporting; 2. Lack of self-determination: Psychological and social motives characterize requests for PAS-E more than physical symptoms or rational choices; many requests disappear with improved symptom control and psychological support; 3. Inadequate palliative care: Better palliative care makes most patients physically comfortable. Many individuals requesting PAS-E don’t want to die but to escape their suffering. Adequate treatment for depression and pain decreases the desire for death; 4. Medical professionalism: PAS-E transgresses the inviolable rule that physicians heal and palliate suffering but never intentionally inflict death; 5. Differences between means and ends: Proeuthanasia advocates look to the ends (the patient’s death) and say the ends justify the means; opponents disagree and believe that killing patients to relieve suffering is different from allowing natural death and is not acceptable. Conclusions: Physicians have a duty to eliminate pain and suffering, not the person with the pain and suffering. Solutions for suffering lie in improving palliative care and social conditions and addressing the reasons for PAS-E requests. They should not include changing medical practice to allow PAS-E.

AB - : Medical professional societies have traditionally opposed physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia (PAS-E), but this opposition may be shifting. We present 5 reasons why physicians shouldn’t be involved in PAS-E. 1. Slippery slopes: There is evidence that safeguards in the Netherlands and Belgium are ineffective and violated, including administering lethal drugs without patient consent, absence of terminal illness, untreated psychiatric diagnoses, and nonreporting; 2. Lack of self-determination: Psychological and social motives characterize requests for PAS-E more than physical symptoms or rational choices; many requests disappear with improved symptom control and psychological support; 3. Inadequate palliative care: Better palliative care makes most patients physically comfortable. Many individuals requesting PAS-E don’t want to die but to escape their suffering. Adequate treatment for depression and pain decreases the desire for death; 4. Medical professionalism: PAS-E transgresses the inviolable rule that physicians heal and palliate suffering but never intentionally inflict death; 5. Differences between means and ends: Proeuthanasia advocates look to the ends (the patient’s death) and say the ends justify the means; opponents disagree and believe that killing patients to relieve suffering is different from allowing natural death and is not acceptable. Conclusions: Physicians have a duty to eliminate pain and suffering, not the person with the pain and suffering. Solutions for suffering lie in improving palliative care and social conditions and addressing the reasons for PAS-E requests. They should not include changing medical practice to allow PAS-E.

KW - autonomy

KW - euthanasia

KW - palliative care

KW - professional–professional relationship

KW - suicide/assisted suicide

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047918318&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047918318&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0825859718777325

DO - 10.1177/0825859718777325

M3 - Article

C2 - 29852810

AN - SCOPUS:85047918318

JO - Journal of Palliative Care

JF - Journal of Palliative Care

SN - 0825-8597

ER -