Physiology versus evidence-based guidance for critical care practice

Luciano Gattinoni, Eleonora Carlesso, Alessandro Santini

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Evidence based medicine is an attempt to optimize the medical decision process through methods primarily based on evidence coming from meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and randomized controlled trials ("evidence-based medicine"), rather than on "clinical judgment" alone. The randomized trials are the cornerstones of this process. However, the randomized trials are just a method to prove or disprove a given hypothesis, which, in turn, derives from a general observation of the reality (premises or theories). In this paper we will examine some of the most recent randomized trials performed in Intensive Care, analyzing their premises, hypothesis and outcome. It is quite evident that when the premises are wrong or too vague the unavoidable consequences will be a negative outcome. We should pay when designing the trial an equal attention in defining premises and hypothesis that we pay for the trial conduction.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberS7
JournalCritical Care
Volume19
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 18 2015

Fingerprint

Evidence-Based Medicine
Critical Care
Meta-Analysis
Randomized Controlled Trials
Observation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Physiology versus evidence-based guidance for critical care practice. / Gattinoni, Luciano; Carlesso, Eleonora; Santini, Alessandro.

In: Critical Care, Vol. 19, S7, 18.12.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Gattinoni, Luciano ; Carlesso, Eleonora ; Santini, Alessandro. / Physiology versus evidence-based guidance for critical care practice. In: Critical Care. 2015 ; Vol. 19.
@article{95b85ac788e1453d93b857e602555618,
title = "Physiology versus evidence-based guidance for critical care practice",
abstract = "Evidence based medicine is an attempt to optimize the medical decision process through methods primarily based on evidence coming from meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and randomized controlled trials ({"}evidence-based medicine{"}), rather than on {"}clinical judgment{"} alone. The randomized trials are the cornerstones of this process. However, the randomized trials are just a method to prove or disprove a given hypothesis, which, in turn, derives from a general observation of the reality (premises or theories). In this paper we will examine some of the most recent randomized trials performed in Intensive Care, analyzing their premises, hypothesis and outcome. It is quite evident that when the premises are wrong or too vague the unavoidable consequences will be a negative outcome. We should pay when designing the trial an equal attention in defining premises and hypothesis that we pay for the trial conduction.",
author = "Luciano Gattinoni and Eleonora Carlesso and Alessandro Santini",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "18",
doi = "10.1186/cc14725",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
journal = "Critical Care",
issn = "1466-609X",
publisher = "Springer Science + Business Media",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Physiology versus evidence-based guidance for critical care practice

AU - Gattinoni, Luciano

AU - Carlesso, Eleonora

AU - Santini, Alessandro

PY - 2015/12/18

Y1 - 2015/12/18

N2 - Evidence based medicine is an attempt to optimize the medical decision process through methods primarily based on evidence coming from meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and randomized controlled trials ("evidence-based medicine"), rather than on "clinical judgment" alone. The randomized trials are the cornerstones of this process. However, the randomized trials are just a method to prove or disprove a given hypothesis, which, in turn, derives from a general observation of the reality (premises or theories). In this paper we will examine some of the most recent randomized trials performed in Intensive Care, analyzing their premises, hypothesis and outcome. It is quite evident that when the premises are wrong or too vague the unavoidable consequences will be a negative outcome. We should pay when designing the trial an equal attention in defining premises and hypothesis that we pay for the trial conduction.

AB - Evidence based medicine is an attempt to optimize the medical decision process through methods primarily based on evidence coming from meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and randomized controlled trials ("evidence-based medicine"), rather than on "clinical judgment" alone. The randomized trials are the cornerstones of this process. However, the randomized trials are just a method to prove or disprove a given hypothesis, which, in turn, derives from a general observation of the reality (premises or theories). In this paper we will examine some of the most recent randomized trials performed in Intensive Care, analyzing their premises, hypothesis and outcome. It is quite evident that when the premises are wrong or too vague the unavoidable consequences will be a negative outcome. We should pay when designing the trial an equal attention in defining premises and hypothesis that we pay for the trial conduction.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978924116&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84978924116&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/cc14725

DO - 10.1186/cc14725

M3 - Review article

VL - 19

JO - Critical Care

JF - Critical Care

SN - 1466-609X

M1 - S7

ER -