Piezosurgery versus conventional osteotomy in orthognathic surgery: A paradigm shift in treatment

Dario Bertossi, Alessandra Lucchese, Massimo Albanese, Matteo Turra, Fiorenzo Faccioni, Pierfrancesco Nocini, Ruggero Rodriguez Y Baena

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The aim of the study was to compare in a randomized controlled clinical trial the use of the piezoelectric osteotomy as an alternative to the conventional approach in terms of surgery time, intraoperative blood loss, cut quality, nerve injury, and costs.One hundred ten patients who had orthognathic surgery procedures with bimaxillary osteotomy were divided into 2 groups: group A was treated with a piezosurgery device, and group B, with a reciprocating saw and bur.The piezosurgical bone osteotomy permitted individualized cut designs. The surgical time in group A was reduced, with a mean for the mandibular osteotomy (1 side) between 3 minutes 31 seconds and 5 minutes 2 seconds, whereas in group B, the surgical time was between 7 minutes 23 seconds and 10 minutes 22 seconds. The surgical time in group A for the Le Fort I osteotomy was between 5 minutes 17 seconds and 7 minutes 55 seconds in group A and between 8 minutes 38 seconds and 15 minutes 11 seconds in group B. All patients in group A had a low blood loss (500 mL). Inferior alveolar nerve sensation was retained in 98.2% of group A versus 92.7% in group B at 6 months postoperative testing.Piezoelectric osteotomy reduced surgical time, blood loss, and inferior alveolar nerve injury in bimaxillary osteotomy. Absence of macrovibrations makes the instrument more manageable and easy to use and allows greater intraoperative control with higher safety in cutting in difficult anatomical regions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1763-1766
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Craniofacial Surgery
Volume24
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2013

Fingerprint

Piezosurgery
Orthognathic Surgery
Osteotomy
Operative Time
Mandibular Nerve
Le Fort Osteotomy
Surgical Blood Loss
Mandibular Osteotomy
Therapeutics
Wounds and Injuries
Randomized Controlled Trials
Safety
Costs and Cost Analysis
Bone and Bones
Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • Dentoskeletal malformations
  • Orthognatic surgery
  • Piezosurgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Surgery

Cite this

Piezosurgery versus conventional osteotomy in orthognathic surgery : A paradigm shift in treatment. / Bertossi, Dario; Lucchese, Alessandra; Albanese, Massimo; Turra, Matteo; Faccioni, Fiorenzo; Nocini, Pierfrancesco; Rodriguez Y Baena, Ruggero.

In: Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, Vol. 24, No. 5, 09.2013, p. 1763-1766.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bertossi, D, Lucchese, A, Albanese, M, Turra, M, Faccioni, F, Nocini, P & Rodriguez Y Baena, R 2013, 'Piezosurgery versus conventional osteotomy in orthognathic surgery: A paradigm shift in treatment', Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 1763-1766. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e31828f1aa8
Bertossi, Dario ; Lucchese, Alessandra ; Albanese, Massimo ; Turra, Matteo ; Faccioni, Fiorenzo ; Nocini, Pierfrancesco ; Rodriguez Y Baena, Ruggero. / Piezosurgery versus conventional osteotomy in orthognathic surgery : A paradigm shift in treatment. In: Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2013 ; Vol. 24, No. 5. pp. 1763-1766.
@article{25304e77e77e4ca08191c2750118632b,
title = "Piezosurgery versus conventional osteotomy in orthognathic surgery: A paradigm shift in treatment",
abstract = "The aim of the study was to compare in a randomized controlled clinical trial the use of the piezoelectric osteotomy as an alternative to the conventional approach in terms of surgery time, intraoperative blood loss, cut quality, nerve injury, and costs.One hundred ten patients who had orthognathic surgery procedures with bimaxillary osteotomy were divided into 2 groups: group A was treated with a piezosurgery device, and group B, with a reciprocating saw and bur.The piezosurgical bone osteotomy permitted individualized cut designs. The surgical time in group A was reduced, with a mean for the mandibular osteotomy (1 side) between 3 minutes 31 seconds and 5 minutes 2 seconds, whereas in group B, the surgical time was between 7 minutes 23 seconds and 10 minutes 22 seconds. The surgical time in group A for the Le Fort I osteotomy was between 5 minutes 17 seconds and 7 minutes 55 seconds in group A and between 8 minutes 38 seconds and 15 minutes 11 seconds in group B. All patients in group A had a low blood loss (500 mL). Inferior alveolar nerve sensation was retained in 98.2{\%} of group A versus 92.7{\%} in group B at 6 months postoperative testing.Piezoelectric osteotomy reduced surgical time, blood loss, and inferior alveolar nerve injury in bimaxillary osteotomy. Absence of macrovibrations makes the instrument more manageable and easy to use and allows greater intraoperative control with higher safety in cutting in difficult anatomical regions.",
keywords = "Dentoskeletal malformations, Orthognatic surgery, Piezosurgery",
author = "Dario Bertossi and Alessandra Lucchese and Massimo Albanese and Matteo Turra and Fiorenzo Faccioni and Pierfrancesco Nocini and {Rodriguez Y Baena}, Ruggero",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1097/SCS.0b013e31828f1aa8",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "1763--1766",
journal = "Journal of Craniofacial Surgery",
issn = "1049-2275",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Piezosurgery versus conventional osteotomy in orthognathic surgery

T2 - A paradigm shift in treatment

AU - Bertossi, Dario

AU - Lucchese, Alessandra

AU - Albanese, Massimo

AU - Turra, Matteo

AU - Faccioni, Fiorenzo

AU - Nocini, Pierfrancesco

AU - Rodriguez Y Baena, Ruggero

PY - 2013/9

Y1 - 2013/9

N2 - The aim of the study was to compare in a randomized controlled clinical trial the use of the piezoelectric osteotomy as an alternative to the conventional approach in terms of surgery time, intraoperative blood loss, cut quality, nerve injury, and costs.One hundred ten patients who had orthognathic surgery procedures with bimaxillary osteotomy were divided into 2 groups: group A was treated with a piezosurgery device, and group B, with a reciprocating saw and bur.The piezosurgical bone osteotomy permitted individualized cut designs. The surgical time in group A was reduced, with a mean for the mandibular osteotomy (1 side) between 3 minutes 31 seconds and 5 minutes 2 seconds, whereas in group B, the surgical time was between 7 minutes 23 seconds and 10 minutes 22 seconds. The surgical time in group A for the Le Fort I osteotomy was between 5 minutes 17 seconds and 7 minutes 55 seconds in group A and between 8 minutes 38 seconds and 15 minutes 11 seconds in group B. All patients in group A had a low blood loss (500 mL). Inferior alveolar nerve sensation was retained in 98.2% of group A versus 92.7% in group B at 6 months postoperative testing.Piezoelectric osteotomy reduced surgical time, blood loss, and inferior alveolar nerve injury in bimaxillary osteotomy. Absence of macrovibrations makes the instrument more manageable and easy to use and allows greater intraoperative control with higher safety in cutting in difficult anatomical regions.

AB - The aim of the study was to compare in a randomized controlled clinical trial the use of the piezoelectric osteotomy as an alternative to the conventional approach in terms of surgery time, intraoperative blood loss, cut quality, nerve injury, and costs.One hundred ten patients who had orthognathic surgery procedures with bimaxillary osteotomy were divided into 2 groups: group A was treated with a piezosurgery device, and group B, with a reciprocating saw and bur.The piezosurgical bone osteotomy permitted individualized cut designs. The surgical time in group A was reduced, with a mean for the mandibular osteotomy (1 side) between 3 minutes 31 seconds and 5 minutes 2 seconds, whereas in group B, the surgical time was between 7 minutes 23 seconds and 10 minutes 22 seconds. The surgical time in group A for the Le Fort I osteotomy was between 5 minutes 17 seconds and 7 minutes 55 seconds in group A and between 8 minutes 38 seconds and 15 minutes 11 seconds in group B. All patients in group A had a low blood loss (500 mL). Inferior alveolar nerve sensation was retained in 98.2% of group A versus 92.7% in group B at 6 months postoperative testing.Piezoelectric osteotomy reduced surgical time, blood loss, and inferior alveolar nerve injury in bimaxillary osteotomy. Absence of macrovibrations makes the instrument more manageable and easy to use and allows greater intraoperative control with higher safety in cutting in difficult anatomical regions.

KW - Dentoskeletal malformations

KW - Orthognatic surgery

KW - Piezosurgery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84885063048&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84885063048&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31828f1aa8

DO - 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31828f1aa8

M3 - Article

C2 - 24036775

AN - SCOPUS:84885063048

VL - 24

SP - 1763

EP - 1766

JO - Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

JF - Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

SN - 1049-2275

IS - 5

ER -