Platelet Counts and Patent Ductus Arteriosus in Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Sorina R. Simon, Lieke Van Zogchel, Maria Pilar Bas-Suárez, Giacomo Cavallaro, Ronald I. Clyman, Eduardo Villamor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Several cohort studies have shown an association between low platelet counts in the first day(s) of life and patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) in preterm infants. However, these results have not been confirmed by other studies. Objective: To perform a meta-analysis of all the studies addressing the relationship between platelet counts in the first day(s) of life and PDA in preterm infants. Methods: PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched from their inception until December 2014. Results from 11 cohort studies involving 3,479 preterm infants (gestational age 9/l [6 studies, risk ratio (RR) = 1.215, 95% CI: 1.027-1.436], between PDA and platelet counts 9/l (5 studies, RR = 1.255, 95% CI: 1.034-1.525), and between significant PDA (SPDA) and platelet counts 9/l (5 studies, RR = 1.254, 95% CI: 1.021-1.540). The association between SPDA and platelet counts 9/l was not statistically significant (6 studies, RR = 1.289, 95% CI: 0.925-1.795). Pooled standard differences in mean platelet counts between infants with and without PDA/SPDA were not statistically different. Conclusion: This meta-analysis reveals a marginal but significant association between low platelet counts in the first day(s) of life and PDA/SPDA in very preterm infants. This association needs to be confirmed in prospective studies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)143-151
Number of pages9
JournalNeonatology
Volume108
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 20 2015

Keywords

  • Ductus arteriosus
  • Meta-analysis
  • Platelets

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental Biology
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Platelet Counts and Patent Ductus Arteriosus in Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this