TY - JOUR
T1 - Platinum-based doublet chemotherapy in pre-treated malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) patients
T2 - A mono-institutional experience
AU - Pasello, Giulia
AU - Nicotra, Samuele
AU - Marulli, Giuseppe
AU - Rea, Federico
AU - Bonanno, Laura
AU - Carli, Paolo
AU - Magro, Cristina
AU - Jirillo, Antonio
AU - Favaretto, Adolfo
PY - 2011/9
Y1 - 2011/9
N2 - Background: The major clinical problems of MPM management are the short duration of response and the early relapse. Currently, after the first-line standard pemetrexed/platinum combination there is not a defined regimen for the second line treatment of MPM, and the clinical benefits in fit patients are uncertain. We analyzed the feasibility of gemcitabine/platinum chemotherapy in pretreated MPM patients. Methods: Eligible patients should have relapsed after first-line chemotherapy with pemetrexed plus cisplatin (24%) or carboplatin (76%); 53% of the patients had previously received trimodality treatment, 18% neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by pleurectomy/decortication, 29% were inoperable. Patients had to have PS = 0-2, adequate organ function, measurable disease. Chemotherapy was gemcitabine 1000mg/m 2 days 1, 8 associated to the alternative platinum compound respect to 1st line, i.e. cisplatin 75mg/m 2 or carboplatin AUC 5 day 1 every 3 weeks, for 3-6 cycles. Baseline staging and reassessment after cycles 3 and 6 were performed with CT-scan. Results: Since 2006 17 relapsed MPM patients were referred to our centre. Patients were 12 males and 5 females; median age: 61 years (range 47-74); histology: 12 epithelial, 4 sarcomatoid and 1 biphasic. PS 1-2 (15:2).The combination of gemcitabine with carboplatin/cisplatin was administered as second line treatment in 13 (76%) patients, as third line in 4 (24%) patients. Two patients were lost to follow-up without re-evaluation, therefore radiologic and clinical response was assessable in 15 (88%) patients. Among evaluable patients 10 (67%) showed stable disease and 5 (33%) progressive disease. Symptoms improved in 8 (53%) cases. In the intent-to-treat population median survival was 28 weeks (range 13-168) and median time-to-treatment failure 15 weeks (range 3-75).Toxicity profile showed 2 (13%) grade 4 and 6 (40%) grade 3 thrombocytopenia, 4 (27%) grade 3 leucopenia, 3 (20%) grade 3 anaemia and 6 (40%) of grade 3 neutropenia. Grade 3 non haematological toxicities were nausea (14%) and asthenia (21%). Conclusion: Gemcitabine-platinum regimens are able to control symptoms and disease progression with a modest toxicity profile. The present results from a small series of patients should be confirmed by a prospective trial in a larger cohort of patients.
AB - Background: The major clinical problems of MPM management are the short duration of response and the early relapse. Currently, after the first-line standard pemetrexed/platinum combination there is not a defined regimen for the second line treatment of MPM, and the clinical benefits in fit patients are uncertain. We analyzed the feasibility of gemcitabine/platinum chemotherapy in pretreated MPM patients. Methods: Eligible patients should have relapsed after first-line chemotherapy with pemetrexed plus cisplatin (24%) or carboplatin (76%); 53% of the patients had previously received trimodality treatment, 18% neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by pleurectomy/decortication, 29% were inoperable. Patients had to have PS = 0-2, adequate organ function, measurable disease. Chemotherapy was gemcitabine 1000mg/m 2 days 1, 8 associated to the alternative platinum compound respect to 1st line, i.e. cisplatin 75mg/m 2 or carboplatin AUC 5 day 1 every 3 weeks, for 3-6 cycles. Baseline staging and reassessment after cycles 3 and 6 were performed with CT-scan. Results: Since 2006 17 relapsed MPM patients were referred to our centre. Patients were 12 males and 5 females; median age: 61 years (range 47-74); histology: 12 epithelial, 4 sarcomatoid and 1 biphasic. PS 1-2 (15:2).The combination of gemcitabine with carboplatin/cisplatin was administered as second line treatment in 13 (76%) patients, as third line in 4 (24%) patients. Two patients were lost to follow-up without re-evaluation, therefore radiologic and clinical response was assessable in 15 (88%) patients. Among evaluable patients 10 (67%) showed stable disease and 5 (33%) progressive disease. Symptoms improved in 8 (53%) cases. In the intent-to-treat population median survival was 28 weeks (range 13-168) and median time-to-treatment failure 15 weeks (range 3-75).Toxicity profile showed 2 (13%) grade 4 and 6 (40%) grade 3 thrombocytopenia, 4 (27%) grade 3 leucopenia, 3 (20%) grade 3 anaemia and 6 (40%) of grade 3 neutropenia. Grade 3 non haematological toxicities were nausea (14%) and asthenia (21%). Conclusion: Gemcitabine-platinum regimens are able to control symptoms and disease progression with a modest toxicity profile. The present results from a small series of patients should be confirmed by a prospective trial in a larger cohort of patients.
KW - Clinical benefit
KW - Gemcitabine
KW - Malignant pleural mesothelioma
KW - Platinum-based chemotherapy
KW - Second-line treatment
KW - Third-line treatment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960890751&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79960890751&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.lungcan.2011.01.005
DO - 10.1016/j.lungcan.2011.01.005
M3 - Article
C2 - 21296448
AN - SCOPUS:79960890751
VL - 73
SP - 351
EP - 355
JO - Lung Cancer
JF - Lung Cancer
SN - 0169-5002
IS - 3
ER -