Positive end-expiratory pressure delays the progression of lung injury during ventilator strategies involving high airway pressure and lung overdistention

Franco Valenza, Massimiliano Guglielmi, Manuela Irace, Giuliana Anna Porro, Silvio Sibilla, Luciano Gattinoni

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Many studies have investigated the protective role of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on ventilator-induced lung injury. Most assessed lung injury in protocols involving different ventilation strategies applied for the same length of time. This study, however, set out to investigate the protective role of PEEP with respect to the time needed to reach similar levels of lung injury. Design: Prospective, randomized laboratory animal investigation. Setting: The University Laboratory of Ospedale Maggiore, Milano, IRCCS. Subjects: Anesthetized, paralyzed, and mechanically ventilated Sprague-Dawley rats. Interventions: Three groups of five Sprague-Dawley rats were ventilated using zero end-expiratory pressure ZEEP (PEEP of 0 cm H2O) and PEEP of 3 and 6 cm H2O and a similar index of lung overdistension (Pawp/P100 ≅ 1.1; where Pawp is peak airway pressure and P100 is the pressure corresponding to total lung capacity). To obtain this, tidal volume was reduced depending on the PEEP. To reach similar levels of lung injury, we measured respiratory system elastance while ventilating the animals and killed them when respiratory system elastance was 150% of baseline. Once target respiratory system elastance was reached, the lung wet-to-dry ratio was obtained. Results: Rats were ventilated with comparable high airway pressure (Pawp of 42.8 ± 3.1, 43.5 ± 2.6, and 46.2 ± 4.4, respectively, for PEEP 0, 3, and 6) obtaining similar overdistension (Pawp/P100 - index of overdistension: 1.17 ± 0.2, 1.06 ± 0.1, and 1.19 ± 0.2). The respiratory system elastance target was reached and wet-to-dry ratio was not different in the three groups, suggesting a similar degree of lung damage. The time taken to achieve the target respiratory system elastance was three times longer with PEEP 3 and 6 (55 ± 14 mins and 60 ± 17) as compared with zero end-expiratory pressure (18 ± 3 mins, p <.001). Conclusion: These findings confirm that PEEP is protective against ventilator-induced lung injury and may enable the clinician to "buy time" in the progression of lung injury.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1993-1998
Number of pages6
JournalCritical Care Medicine
Volume31
Issue number7
Publication statusPublished - Jul 1 2003

Fingerprint

Positive-Pressure Respiration
Lung Injury
Mechanical Ventilators
Pressure
Lung
Respiratory System
Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury
Sprague Dawley Rats
Total Lung Capacity
Tidal Volume
Laboratory Animals
Pulmonary Edema
Ventilation

Keywords

  • Mechanical ventilatory support
  • Positive end-expiratory pressure
  • Respiratory mechanics
  • Time
  • Ventilator-induced lung injury

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Positive end-expiratory pressure delays the progression of lung injury during ventilator strategies involving high airway pressure and lung overdistention. / Valenza, Franco; Guglielmi, Massimiliano; Irace, Manuela; Porro, Giuliana Anna; Sibilla, Silvio; Gattinoni, Luciano.

In: Critical Care Medicine, Vol. 31, No. 7, 01.07.2003, p. 1993-1998.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Valenza, Franco ; Guglielmi, Massimiliano ; Irace, Manuela ; Porro, Giuliana Anna ; Sibilla, Silvio ; Gattinoni, Luciano. / Positive end-expiratory pressure delays the progression of lung injury during ventilator strategies involving high airway pressure and lung overdistention. In: Critical Care Medicine. 2003 ; Vol. 31, No. 7. pp. 1993-1998.
@article{67b43b268a664bc39b9dfdc2c334bc8e,
title = "Positive end-expiratory pressure delays the progression of lung injury during ventilator strategies involving high airway pressure and lung overdistention",
abstract = "Objective: Many studies have investigated the protective role of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on ventilator-induced lung injury. Most assessed lung injury in protocols involving different ventilation strategies applied for the same length of time. This study, however, set out to investigate the protective role of PEEP with respect to the time needed to reach similar levels of lung injury. Design: Prospective, randomized laboratory animal investigation. Setting: The University Laboratory of Ospedale Maggiore, Milano, IRCCS. Subjects: Anesthetized, paralyzed, and mechanically ventilated Sprague-Dawley rats. Interventions: Three groups of five Sprague-Dawley rats were ventilated using zero end-expiratory pressure ZEEP (PEEP of 0 cm H2O) and PEEP of 3 and 6 cm H2O and a similar index of lung overdistension (Pawp/P100 ≅ 1.1; where Pawp is peak airway pressure and P100 is the pressure corresponding to total lung capacity). To obtain this, tidal volume was reduced depending on the PEEP. To reach similar levels of lung injury, we measured respiratory system elastance while ventilating the animals and killed them when respiratory system elastance was 150{\%} of baseline. Once target respiratory system elastance was reached, the lung wet-to-dry ratio was obtained. Results: Rats were ventilated with comparable high airway pressure (Pawp of 42.8 ± 3.1, 43.5 ± 2.6, and 46.2 ± 4.4, respectively, for PEEP 0, 3, and 6) obtaining similar overdistension (Pawp/P100 - index of overdistension: 1.17 ± 0.2, 1.06 ± 0.1, and 1.19 ± 0.2). The respiratory system elastance target was reached and wet-to-dry ratio was not different in the three groups, suggesting a similar degree of lung damage. The time taken to achieve the target respiratory system elastance was three times longer with PEEP 3 and 6 (55 ± 14 mins and 60 ± 17) as compared with zero end-expiratory pressure (18 ± 3 mins, p <.001). Conclusion: These findings confirm that PEEP is protective against ventilator-induced lung injury and may enable the clinician to {"}buy time{"} in the progression of lung injury.",
keywords = "Mechanical ventilatory support, Positive end-expiratory pressure, Respiratory mechanics, Time, Ventilator-induced lung injury",
author = "Franco Valenza and Massimiliano Guglielmi and Manuela Irace and Porro, {Giuliana Anna} and Silvio Sibilla and Luciano Gattinoni",
year = "2003",
month = "7",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "1993--1998",
journal = "Critical Care Medicine",
issn = "0090-3493",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Positive end-expiratory pressure delays the progression of lung injury during ventilator strategies involving high airway pressure and lung overdistention

AU - Valenza, Franco

AU - Guglielmi, Massimiliano

AU - Irace, Manuela

AU - Porro, Giuliana Anna

AU - Sibilla, Silvio

AU - Gattinoni, Luciano

PY - 2003/7/1

Y1 - 2003/7/1

N2 - Objective: Many studies have investigated the protective role of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on ventilator-induced lung injury. Most assessed lung injury in protocols involving different ventilation strategies applied for the same length of time. This study, however, set out to investigate the protective role of PEEP with respect to the time needed to reach similar levels of lung injury. Design: Prospective, randomized laboratory animal investigation. Setting: The University Laboratory of Ospedale Maggiore, Milano, IRCCS. Subjects: Anesthetized, paralyzed, and mechanically ventilated Sprague-Dawley rats. Interventions: Three groups of five Sprague-Dawley rats were ventilated using zero end-expiratory pressure ZEEP (PEEP of 0 cm H2O) and PEEP of 3 and 6 cm H2O and a similar index of lung overdistension (Pawp/P100 ≅ 1.1; where Pawp is peak airway pressure and P100 is the pressure corresponding to total lung capacity). To obtain this, tidal volume was reduced depending on the PEEP. To reach similar levels of lung injury, we measured respiratory system elastance while ventilating the animals and killed them when respiratory system elastance was 150% of baseline. Once target respiratory system elastance was reached, the lung wet-to-dry ratio was obtained. Results: Rats were ventilated with comparable high airway pressure (Pawp of 42.8 ± 3.1, 43.5 ± 2.6, and 46.2 ± 4.4, respectively, for PEEP 0, 3, and 6) obtaining similar overdistension (Pawp/P100 - index of overdistension: 1.17 ± 0.2, 1.06 ± 0.1, and 1.19 ± 0.2). The respiratory system elastance target was reached and wet-to-dry ratio was not different in the three groups, suggesting a similar degree of lung damage. The time taken to achieve the target respiratory system elastance was three times longer with PEEP 3 and 6 (55 ± 14 mins and 60 ± 17) as compared with zero end-expiratory pressure (18 ± 3 mins, p <.001). Conclusion: These findings confirm that PEEP is protective against ventilator-induced lung injury and may enable the clinician to "buy time" in the progression of lung injury.

AB - Objective: Many studies have investigated the protective role of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on ventilator-induced lung injury. Most assessed lung injury in protocols involving different ventilation strategies applied for the same length of time. This study, however, set out to investigate the protective role of PEEP with respect to the time needed to reach similar levels of lung injury. Design: Prospective, randomized laboratory animal investigation. Setting: The University Laboratory of Ospedale Maggiore, Milano, IRCCS. Subjects: Anesthetized, paralyzed, and mechanically ventilated Sprague-Dawley rats. Interventions: Three groups of five Sprague-Dawley rats were ventilated using zero end-expiratory pressure ZEEP (PEEP of 0 cm H2O) and PEEP of 3 and 6 cm H2O and a similar index of lung overdistension (Pawp/P100 ≅ 1.1; where Pawp is peak airway pressure and P100 is the pressure corresponding to total lung capacity). To obtain this, tidal volume was reduced depending on the PEEP. To reach similar levels of lung injury, we measured respiratory system elastance while ventilating the animals and killed them when respiratory system elastance was 150% of baseline. Once target respiratory system elastance was reached, the lung wet-to-dry ratio was obtained. Results: Rats were ventilated with comparable high airway pressure (Pawp of 42.8 ± 3.1, 43.5 ± 2.6, and 46.2 ± 4.4, respectively, for PEEP 0, 3, and 6) obtaining similar overdistension (Pawp/P100 - index of overdistension: 1.17 ± 0.2, 1.06 ± 0.1, and 1.19 ± 0.2). The respiratory system elastance target was reached and wet-to-dry ratio was not different in the three groups, suggesting a similar degree of lung damage. The time taken to achieve the target respiratory system elastance was three times longer with PEEP 3 and 6 (55 ± 14 mins and 60 ± 17) as compared with zero end-expiratory pressure (18 ± 3 mins, p <.001). Conclusion: These findings confirm that PEEP is protective against ventilator-induced lung injury and may enable the clinician to "buy time" in the progression of lung injury.

KW - Mechanical ventilatory support

KW - Positive end-expiratory pressure

KW - Respiratory mechanics

KW - Time

KW - Ventilator-induced lung injury

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0042868267&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0042868267&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 1993

EP - 1998

JO - Critical Care Medicine

JF - Critical Care Medicine

SN - 0090-3493

IS - 7

ER -