Post-relapse outcomes after primary extended resection of retroperitoneal sarcoma: A report from the Trans-Atlantic RPS Working Group

Andrea J. MacNeill, Rosalba Miceli, Dirk C. Strauss, Sylvie Bonvalot, Peter Hohenberger, Frits Van Coevorden, Piotr Rutkowski, Dario Callegaro, Andrew J. Hayes, Charles Honoré, Mark Fairweather, Amanda Cannell, Jens Jakob, Rick L. Haas, Milena Szacht, Marco Fiore, Paolo G. Casali, Raphael E. Pollock, Chandrajit P. Raut, Alessandro GronchiCarol J. Swallow

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite a radical surgical approach to primary retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS), many patients experience locoregional and/or distant recurrence. The objective of this study was to analyze post-relapse outcomes for patients with RPS who had initially undergone surgical resection of their primary tumor at a specialist center. METHODS: All consecutive patients who underwent macroscopically complete resection for primary RPS at 8 high volume centers from January 2002 to December 2011 were identified, and those who developed local recurrence (LR) only, distant metastasis (DM) only, or synchronous local recurrence and distant metastasis (LR+DM) during the follow-up period were included. Overall survival (OS) was calculated for all groups, as was the crude cumulative incidence of a second recurrence after the first LR. Multivariate analyses for OS were performed. RESULTS: In an initial series of 1007 patients with primary RPS, 408 patients developed recurrent disease during the follow-up period. The median follow-up from the time of recurrence was 41 months. The median OS was 33 months after LR (n = 219), 25 months after DM (n = 146), and 12 months after LR+DM (n = 43), and the 5-year OS rates were 29%, 20%, and 14%, respectively. Predictors of OS after LR were the time interval to LR and resection of LR, while histologic grade approached significance. For DM, significant predictors of OS were the time interval to DM and histologic subtype. The subgroup of patients who underwent resection of recurrent disease had a longer median OS than patients who did not undergo resection. CONCLUSIONS: Relapse of RPS portends high disease-specific mortality. Patients with locally recurrent or metastatic disease should be considered for resection. Cancer 2017;123:1971–1978.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1971-1978
Number of pages8
JournalCancer
Volume123
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 1 2017

Keywords

  • distant metastases
  • local recurrence
  • prognostic factors
  • retroperitoneal sarcoma
  • sarcoma
  • surgery
  • survival

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Post-relapse outcomes after primary extended resection of retroperitoneal sarcoma: A report from the Trans-Atlantic RPS Working Group'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this