Practice Parameter

The Evaluation of Distal Symmetric Polyneuropathy: The Role of Autonomic Testing, Nerve Biopsy, and Skin Biopsy (An Evidence-Based Review). Report of the American Academy of Neurology, the American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine, and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

J. D. England, G. S. Gronseth, G. Franklin, G. T. Carter, L. J. Kinsella, J. A. Cohen, A. K. Asbury, K. Szigeti, J. R. Lupski, N. Latov, R. A. Lewis, P. A. Low, M. A. Fisher, D. Herrmann, J. F. Howard, G. Lauria, R. G. Miller, M. Polydefkis, A. J. Sumner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Distal symmetric polyneuropathy (DSP) is the most common variety of neuropathy. Since the evaluation of this disorder is not standardized, the available literature was reviewed to provide evidence-based guidelines regarding the role of autonomic testing, nerve biopsy and skin biopsy for the assessment of polyneuropathy. Methods: A literature review using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index and Current Contents was performed to identify the best evidence regarding the evaluation of polyneuropathy published between 1980 and March 2007. Articles were classified according to a four-tiered level of evidence scheme and recommendations were based upon the level of evidence. Results and Conclusions: 1. Autonomic testing may be considered in the evaluation of patients with polyneuropathy to document autonomic nervous system dysfunction (Level B). Such testing should be considered especially for the evaluation of suspected autonomic neuropathy (Level B) and distal small fiber sensory polyneuropathy (SFSN) (Level C). A battery of validated tests is recommended to achieve the highest diagnostic accuracy (Level B). 2. Nerve biopsy is generally accepted as useful in the evaluation of certain neuropathies as in patients with suspected amyloid neuropathy, mononeuropathy multiplex due to vasculitis, or with atypical forms of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). However, the literature is insufficient to provide a recommendation regarding when a nerve biopsy may be useful in the evaluation of DSP (Level U). 3. Skin biopsy is a validated technique for determining intraepidermal nerve fiber (IENF) density and may be considered for the diagnosis of DSP, particularly SFSN (Level C). There is a need for additional prospective studies to define more exact guidelines for the evaluation of polyneuropathy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)14-22
Number of pages9
JournalPM and R
Volume1
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2009

Fingerprint

Autonomic Pathways
Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
Polyneuropathies
Biopsy
Skin
Amyloid Neuropathies
Guidelines
Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy
Mononeuropathies
Autonomic Nervous System
Vasculitis
Nerve Fibers
MEDLINE
Prospective Studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Practice Parameter : The Evaluation of Distal Symmetric Polyneuropathy: The Role of Autonomic Testing, Nerve Biopsy, and Skin Biopsy (An Evidence-Based Review). Report of the American Academy of Neurology, the American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine, and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. / England, J. D.; Gronseth, G. S.; Franklin, G.; Carter, G. T.; Kinsella, L. J.; Cohen, J. A.; Asbury, A. K.; Szigeti, K.; Lupski, J. R.; Latov, N.; Lewis, R. A.; Low, P. A.; Fisher, M. A.; Herrmann, D.; Howard, J. F.; Lauria, G.; Miller, R. G.; Polydefkis, M.; Sumner, A. J.

In: PM and R, Vol. 1, No. 1, 01.2009, p. 14-22.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

England, J. D. ; Gronseth, G. S. ; Franklin, G. ; Carter, G. T. ; Kinsella, L. J. ; Cohen, J. A. ; Asbury, A. K. ; Szigeti, K. ; Lupski, J. R. ; Latov, N. ; Lewis, R. A. ; Low, P. A. ; Fisher, M. A. ; Herrmann, D. ; Howard, J. F. ; Lauria, G. ; Miller, R. G. ; Polydefkis, M. ; Sumner, A. J. / Practice Parameter : The Evaluation of Distal Symmetric Polyneuropathy: The Role of Autonomic Testing, Nerve Biopsy, and Skin Biopsy (An Evidence-Based Review). Report of the American Academy of Neurology, the American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine, and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. In: PM and R. 2009 ; Vol. 1, No. 1. pp. 14-22.
@article{4accc4aa0448453db18f01b814e2782c,
title = "Practice Parameter: The Evaluation of Distal Symmetric Polyneuropathy: The Role of Autonomic Testing, Nerve Biopsy, and Skin Biopsy (An Evidence-Based Review). Report of the American Academy of Neurology, the American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine, and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation",
abstract = "Background: Distal symmetric polyneuropathy (DSP) is the most common variety of neuropathy. Since the evaluation of this disorder is not standardized, the available literature was reviewed to provide evidence-based guidelines regarding the role of autonomic testing, nerve biopsy and skin biopsy for the assessment of polyneuropathy. Methods: A literature review using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index and Current Contents was performed to identify the best evidence regarding the evaluation of polyneuropathy published between 1980 and March 2007. Articles were classified according to a four-tiered level of evidence scheme and recommendations were based upon the level of evidence. Results and Conclusions: 1. Autonomic testing may be considered in the evaluation of patients with polyneuropathy to document autonomic nervous system dysfunction (Level B). Such testing should be considered especially for the evaluation of suspected autonomic neuropathy (Level B) and distal small fiber sensory polyneuropathy (SFSN) (Level C). A battery of validated tests is recommended to achieve the highest diagnostic accuracy (Level B). 2. Nerve biopsy is generally accepted as useful in the evaluation of certain neuropathies as in patients with suspected amyloid neuropathy, mononeuropathy multiplex due to vasculitis, or with atypical forms of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). However, the literature is insufficient to provide a recommendation regarding when a nerve biopsy may be useful in the evaluation of DSP (Level U). 3. Skin biopsy is a validated technique for determining intraepidermal nerve fiber (IENF) density and may be considered for the diagnosis of DSP, particularly SFSN (Level C). There is a need for additional prospective studies to define more exact guidelines for the evaluation of polyneuropathy.",
author = "England, {J. D.} and Gronseth, {G. S.} and G. Franklin and Carter, {G. T.} and Kinsella, {L. J.} and Cohen, {J. A.} and Asbury, {A. K.} and K. Szigeti and Lupski, {J. R.} and N. Latov and Lewis, {R. A.} and Low, {P. A.} and Fisher, {M. A.} and D. Herrmann and Howard, {J. F.} and G. Lauria and Miller, {R. G.} and M. Polydefkis and Sumner, {A. J.}",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.pmrj.2008.11.011",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "14--22",
journal = "PM and R",
issn = "1934-1482",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Practice Parameter

T2 - The Evaluation of Distal Symmetric Polyneuropathy: The Role of Autonomic Testing, Nerve Biopsy, and Skin Biopsy (An Evidence-Based Review). Report of the American Academy of Neurology, the American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine, and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

AU - England, J. D.

AU - Gronseth, G. S.

AU - Franklin, G.

AU - Carter, G. T.

AU - Kinsella, L. J.

AU - Cohen, J. A.

AU - Asbury, A. K.

AU - Szigeti, K.

AU - Lupski, J. R.

AU - Latov, N.

AU - Lewis, R. A.

AU - Low, P. A.

AU - Fisher, M. A.

AU - Herrmann, D.

AU - Howard, J. F.

AU - Lauria, G.

AU - Miller, R. G.

AU - Polydefkis, M.

AU - Sumner, A. J.

PY - 2009/1

Y1 - 2009/1

N2 - Background: Distal symmetric polyneuropathy (DSP) is the most common variety of neuropathy. Since the evaluation of this disorder is not standardized, the available literature was reviewed to provide evidence-based guidelines regarding the role of autonomic testing, nerve biopsy and skin biopsy for the assessment of polyneuropathy. Methods: A literature review using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index and Current Contents was performed to identify the best evidence regarding the evaluation of polyneuropathy published between 1980 and March 2007. Articles were classified according to a four-tiered level of evidence scheme and recommendations were based upon the level of evidence. Results and Conclusions: 1. Autonomic testing may be considered in the evaluation of patients with polyneuropathy to document autonomic nervous system dysfunction (Level B). Such testing should be considered especially for the evaluation of suspected autonomic neuropathy (Level B) and distal small fiber sensory polyneuropathy (SFSN) (Level C). A battery of validated tests is recommended to achieve the highest diagnostic accuracy (Level B). 2. Nerve biopsy is generally accepted as useful in the evaluation of certain neuropathies as in patients with suspected amyloid neuropathy, mononeuropathy multiplex due to vasculitis, or with atypical forms of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). However, the literature is insufficient to provide a recommendation regarding when a nerve biopsy may be useful in the evaluation of DSP (Level U). 3. Skin biopsy is a validated technique for determining intraepidermal nerve fiber (IENF) density and may be considered for the diagnosis of DSP, particularly SFSN (Level C). There is a need for additional prospective studies to define more exact guidelines for the evaluation of polyneuropathy.

AB - Background: Distal symmetric polyneuropathy (DSP) is the most common variety of neuropathy. Since the evaluation of this disorder is not standardized, the available literature was reviewed to provide evidence-based guidelines regarding the role of autonomic testing, nerve biopsy and skin biopsy for the assessment of polyneuropathy. Methods: A literature review using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index and Current Contents was performed to identify the best evidence regarding the evaluation of polyneuropathy published between 1980 and March 2007. Articles were classified according to a four-tiered level of evidence scheme and recommendations were based upon the level of evidence. Results and Conclusions: 1. Autonomic testing may be considered in the evaluation of patients with polyneuropathy to document autonomic nervous system dysfunction (Level B). Such testing should be considered especially for the evaluation of suspected autonomic neuropathy (Level B) and distal small fiber sensory polyneuropathy (SFSN) (Level C). A battery of validated tests is recommended to achieve the highest diagnostic accuracy (Level B). 2. Nerve biopsy is generally accepted as useful in the evaluation of certain neuropathies as in patients with suspected amyloid neuropathy, mononeuropathy multiplex due to vasculitis, or with atypical forms of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). However, the literature is insufficient to provide a recommendation regarding when a nerve biopsy may be useful in the evaluation of DSP (Level U). 3. Skin biopsy is a validated technique for determining intraepidermal nerve fiber (IENF) density and may be considered for the diagnosis of DSP, particularly SFSN (Level C). There is a need for additional prospective studies to define more exact guidelines for the evaluation of polyneuropathy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=61549111225&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=61549111225&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.pmrj.2008.11.011

DO - 10.1016/j.pmrj.2008.11.011

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 14

EP - 22

JO - PM and R

JF - PM and R

SN - 1934-1482

IS - 1

ER -