Preanalytical quality improvement

From dream to reality

Giuseppe Lippi, Jeffrey J. Chance, Stephen Church, Paola Dazzi, Rossana Fontana, Davide Giavarina, Kjell Grankvist, Wim Huisman, Timo Kouri, Vladimir Palicka, Mario Plebani, Vincenzo Puro, Gian Luca Salvagno, Sverre Sandberg, Ken Sikaris, Ian Watson, Ana K. Stankovic, Ana Maria Simundic

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

171 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Laboratory diagnostics (i.e., the total testing process) develops conventionally through a virtual loop, originally referred to as "the brain to brain cycle" by George Lundberg. Throughout this complex cycle, there is an inherent possibility that a mistake might occur. According to reliable data, preanalytical errors still account for nearly 60%-70% of all problems occurring in laboratory diagnostics, most of them attributable to mishandling procedures during collection, handling, preparing or storing the specimens. Although most of these would be "intercepted" before inappropriate reactions are taken, in nearly one fifth of the cases they can produce inappropriate investigations and unjustifiable increase in costs, while generating inappropriate clinical decisions and causing some unfortunate circumstances. Several steps have already been undertaken to increase awareness and establish a governance of this frequently overlooked aspect of the total testing process. Standardization and monitoring preanalytical variables is of foremost importance and is associated with the most efficient and well-organized laboratories, resulting in reduced operational costs and increased revenues. As such, this article is aimed at providing readers with significant updates on the total quality management of the preanalytical phase to endeavour further improvement for patient safety throughout this phase of the total testing process.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1113-1126
Number of pages14
JournalClinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
Volume49
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 1 2011

Fingerprint

Quality Improvement
Brain
Testing
Total Quality Management
Costs and Cost Analysis
Total quality management
Patient Safety
Standardization
Costs
Monitoring

Keywords

  • errors
  • laboratory diagnostics
  • patient safety
  • preanalytical phase
  • quality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Biochemistry
  • Biochemistry, medical

Cite this

Lippi, G., Chance, J. J., Church, S., Dazzi, P., Fontana, R., Giavarina, D., ... Simundic, A. M. (2011). Preanalytical quality improvement: From dream to reality. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, 49(7), 1113-1126. https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2011.600

Preanalytical quality improvement : From dream to reality. / Lippi, Giuseppe; Chance, Jeffrey J.; Church, Stephen; Dazzi, Paola; Fontana, Rossana; Giavarina, Davide; Grankvist, Kjell; Huisman, Wim; Kouri, Timo; Palicka, Vladimir; Plebani, Mario; Puro, Vincenzo; Salvagno, Gian Luca; Sandberg, Sverre; Sikaris, Ken; Watson, Ian; Stankovic, Ana K.; Simundic, Ana Maria.

In: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Vol. 49, No. 7, 01.07.2011, p. 1113-1126.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lippi, G, Chance, JJ, Church, S, Dazzi, P, Fontana, R, Giavarina, D, Grankvist, K, Huisman, W, Kouri, T, Palicka, V, Plebani, M, Puro, V, Salvagno, GL, Sandberg, S, Sikaris, K, Watson, I, Stankovic, AK & Simundic, AM 2011, 'Preanalytical quality improvement: From dream to reality', Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, vol. 49, no. 7, pp. 1113-1126. https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2011.600
Lippi G, Chance JJ, Church S, Dazzi P, Fontana R, Giavarina D et al. Preanalytical quality improvement: From dream to reality. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. 2011 Jul 1;49(7):1113-1126. https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2011.600
Lippi, Giuseppe ; Chance, Jeffrey J. ; Church, Stephen ; Dazzi, Paola ; Fontana, Rossana ; Giavarina, Davide ; Grankvist, Kjell ; Huisman, Wim ; Kouri, Timo ; Palicka, Vladimir ; Plebani, Mario ; Puro, Vincenzo ; Salvagno, Gian Luca ; Sandberg, Sverre ; Sikaris, Ken ; Watson, Ian ; Stankovic, Ana K. ; Simundic, Ana Maria. / Preanalytical quality improvement : From dream to reality. In: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. 2011 ; Vol. 49, No. 7. pp. 1113-1126.
@article{00dba199a29644d5a55e844545fe15e8,
title = "Preanalytical quality improvement: From dream to reality",
abstract = "Laboratory diagnostics (i.e., the total testing process) develops conventionally through a virtual loop, originally referred to as {"}the brain to brain cycle{"} by George Lundberg. Throughout this complex cycle, there is an inherent possibility that a mistake might occur. According to reliable data, preanalytical errors still account for nearly 60{\%}-70{\%} of all problems occurring in laboratory diagnostics, most of them attributable to mishandling procedures during collection, handling, preparing or storing the specimens. Although most of these would be {"}intercepted{"} before inappropriate reactions are taken, in nearly one fifth of the cases they can produce inappropriate investigations and unjustifiable increase in costs, while generating inappropriate clinical decisions and causing some unfortunate circumstances. Several steps have already been undertaken to increase awareness and establish a governance of this frequently overlooked aspect of the total testing process. Standardization and monitoring preanalytical variables is of foremost importance and is associated with the most efficient and well-organized laboratories, resulting in reduced operational costs and increased revenues. As such, this article is aimed at providing readers with significant updates on the total quality management of the preanalytical phase to endeavour further improvement for patient safety throughout this phase of the total testing process.",
keywords = "errors, laboratory diagnostics, patient safety, preanalytical phase, quality",
author = "Giuseppe Lippi and Chance, {Jeffrey J.} and Stephen Church and Paola Dazzi and Rossana Fontana and Davide Giavarina and Kjell Grankvist and Wim Huisman and Timo Kouri and Vladimir Palicka and Mario Plebani and Vincenzo Puro and Salvagno, {Gian Luca} and Sverre Sandberg and Ken Sikaris and Ian Watson and Stankovic, {Ana K.} and Simundic, {Ana Maria}",
year = "2011",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1515/CCLM.2011.600",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "1113--1126",
journal = "Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine",
issn = "1434-6621",
publisher = "Walter de Gruyter GmbH",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Preanalytical quality improvement

T2 - From dream to reality

AU - Lippi, Giuseppe

AU - Chance, Jeffrey J.

AU - Church, Stephen

AU - Dazzi, Paola

AU - Fontana, Rossana

AU - Giavarina, Davide

AU - Grankvist, Kjell

AU - Huisman, Wim

AU - Kouri, Timo

AU - Palicka, Vladimir

AU - Plebani, Mario

AU - Puro, Vincenzo

AU - Salvagno, Gian Luca

AU - Sandberg, Sverre

AU - Sikaris, Ken

AU - Watson, Ian

AU - Stankovic, Ana K.

AU - Simundic, Ana Maria

PY - 2011/7/1

Y1 - 2011/7/1

N2 - Laboratory diagnostics (i.e., the total testing process) develops conventionally through a virtual loop, originally referred to as "the brain to brain cycle" by George Lundberg. Throughout this complex cycle, there is an inherent possibility that a mistake might occur. According to reliable data, preanalytical errors still account for nearly 60%-70% of all problems occurring in laboratory diagnostics, most of them attributable to mishandling procedures during collection, handling, preparing or storing the specimens. Although most of these would be "intercepted" before inappropriate reactions are taken, in nearly one fifth of the cases they can produce inappropriate investigations and unjustifiable increase in costs, while generating inappropriate clinical decisions and causing some unfortunate circumstances. Several steps have already been undertaken to increase awareness and establish a governance of this frequently overlooked aspect of the total testing process. Standardization and monitoring preanalytical variables is of foremost importance and is associated with the most efficient and well-organized laboratories, resulting in reduced operational costs and increased revenues. As such, this article is aimed at providing readers with significant updates on the total quality management of the preanalytical phase to endeavour further improvement for patient safety throughout this phase of the total testing process.

AB - Laboratory diagnostics (i.e., the total testing process) develops conventionally through a virtual loop, originally referred to as "the brain to brain cycle" by George Lundberg. Throughout this complex cycle, there is an inherent possibility that a mistake might occur. According to reliable data, preanalytical errors still account for nearly 60%-70% of all problems occurring in laboratory diagnostics, most of them attributable to mishandling procedures during collection, handling, preparing or storing the specimens. Although most of these would be "intercepted" before inappropriate reactions are taken, in nearly one fifth of the cases they can produce inappropriate investigations and unjustifiable increase in costs, while generating inappropriate clinical decisions and causing some unfortunate circumstances. Several steps have already been undertaken to increase awareness and establish a governance of this frequently overlooked aspect of the total testing process. Standardization and monitoring preanalytical variables is of foremost importance and is associated with the most efficient and well-organized laboratories, resulting in reduced operational costs and increased revenues. As such, this article is aimed at providing readers with significant updates on the total quality management of the preanalytical phase to endeavour further improvement for patient safety throughout this phase of the total testing process.

KW - errors

KW - laboratory diagnostics

KW - patient safety

KW - preanalytical phase

KW - quality

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960272717&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79960272717&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1515/CCLM.2011.600

DO - 10.1515/CCLM.2011.600

M3 - Article

VL - 49

SP - 1113

EP - 1126

JO - Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine

JF - Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine

SN - 1434-6621

IS - 7

ER -