Predictive performance of the 'Minto' remifentanil pharmacokinetic parameter set in morbidly obese patients ensuing from a new method for calculating lean body mass

Luca La Colla, Andrea Albertin, Giorgio La Colla, Andrea Porta, Giorgio Aldegheri, Domenico Di Candia, Fausto Gigli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Objectives: In a previous article, we showed that the pharmacokinetic set of remifentanil used for target-controlled infusion (TCI) might be biased in obese patients because it incorporates flawed equations for the calculation of lean body mass (LBM), which is a covariate of several pharmacokinetic parameters in this set. The objectives of this study were to determine the predictive performance of the original pharmacokinetic set, which incorporates the James equation for LBM calculation, and to determine the predictive performance of the pharmacokinetic set when a new method to calculate LBM was used (the Janmahasatian equations). Methods: This was an observational study with intraoperative observations and no follow-up. Fifteen morbidly obese inpatients scheduled for bariatric surgery were included in the study. The intervention included manually controlled continuous infusion of remifentanil during the surgery and analysis of arterial blood samples to determine the arterial remifentanil concentration, to be compared with concentrations predicted by either the unadjusted or the adjusted pharmacokinetic set. The statistical analysis included parametric and non-parametric tests on continuous variables and determination of the median performance error (MDPE), median absolute performance error (MDAPE), divergence and wobble. Results: The median values (interquartile ranges) of the MDPE, MDAPE, divergence and wobble forthe James equations during maintenance were-53.4% (-58.7% to-49.2%), 53.4% (49.0-58.7%) 3.3% (2.9-4.7%) and 1.4% h-1 (1.1-2.5% h-1), respectively. The respective values for the Janmahasatian equations were-18.9% (-24.2% to-10.4%), 20.5% (13.3-24.8%), 2.6% (-0.7% to 4.5%) and 1.9% h -1 (1.4-3.0%h-1). The performance (in terms of theMDPEand MDAPE) of the corrected pharmacokinetic set was better than that of the uncorrected one.Conclusion: The predictive performance of the original pharmacokinetic set is not clinically acceptable. Use of a corrected LBM value in morbidly obese patients corrects this pharmacokinetic set and allows its use in obese patients. The 'fictitious height' can be a valid alternative for use of TCI infusion of remifentanil in morbidly obese patients until commercially available infusion pumps and research software are updated and new LBM equations are implemented in their algorithms.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)131-139
Number of pages9
JournalClinical Pharmacokinetics
Volume49
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Pharmacokinetics
Infusion Pumps
Bariatric Surgery
remifentanil
Observational Studies
Inpatients
Software
Maintenance
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmacology (medical)
  • Pharmacology

Cite this

Predictive performance of the 'Minto' remifentanil pharmacokinetic parameter set in morbidly obese patients ensuing from a new method for calculating lean body mass. / Colla, Luca La; Albertin, Andrea; Colla, Giorgio La; Porta, Andrea; Aldegheri, Giorgio; Candia, Domenico Di; Gigli, Fausto.

In: Clinical Pharmacokinetics, Vol. 49, No. 2, 2010, p. 131-139.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Colla, Luca La ; Albertin, Andrea ; Colla, Giorgio La ; Porta, Andrea ; Aldegheri, Giorgio ; Candia, Domenico Di ; Gigli, Fausto. / Predictive performance of the 'Minto' remifentanil pharmacokinetic parameter set in morbidly obese patients ensuing from a new method for calculating lean body mass. In: Clinical Pharmacokinetics. 2010 ; Vol. 49, No. 2. pp. 131-139.
@article{55f89c2d8e624d57a959a906f3fc3cff,
title = "Predictive performance of the 'Minto' remifentanil pharmacokinetic parameter set in morbidly obese patients ensuing from a new method for calculating lean body mass",
abstract = "Background and Objectives: In a previous article, we showed that the pharmacokinetic set of remifentanil used for target-controlled infusion (TCI) might be biased in obese patients because it incorporates flawed equations for the calculation of lean body mass (LBM), which is a covariate of several pharmacokinetic parameters in this set. The objectives of this study were to determine the predictive performance of the original pharmacokinetic set, which incorporates the James equation for LBM calculation, and to determine the predictive performance of the pharmacokinetic set when a new method to calculate LBM was used (the Janmahasatian equations). Methods: This was an observational study with intraoperative observations and no follow-up. Fifteen morbidly obese inpatients scheduled for bariatric surgery were included in the study. The intervention included manually controlled continuous infusion of remifentanil during the surgery and analysis of arterial blood samples to determine the arterial remifentanil concentration, to be compared with concentrations predicted by either the unadjusted or the adjusted pharmacokinetic set. The statistical analysis included parametric and non-parametric tests on continuous variables and determination of the median performance error (MDPE), median absolute performance error (MDAPE), divergence and wobble. Results: The median values (interquartile ranges) of the MDPE, MDAPE, divergence and wobble forthe James equations during maintenance were-53.4{\%} (-58.7{\%} to-49.2{\%}), 53.4{\%} (49.0-58.7{\%}) 3.3{\%} (2.9-4.7{\%}) and 1.4{\%} h-1 (1.1-2.5{\%} h-1), respectively. The respective values for the Janmahasatian equations were-18.9{\%} (-24.2{\%} to-10.4{\%}), 20.5{\%} (13.3-24.8{\%}), 2.6{\%} (-0.7{\%} to 4.5{\%}) and 1.9{\%} h -1 (1.4-3.0{\%}h-1). The performance (in terms of theMDPEand MDAPE) of the corrected pharmacokinetic set was better than that of the uncorrected one.Conclusion: The predictive performance of the original pharmacokinetic set is not clinically acceptable. Use of a corrected LBM value in morbidly obese patients corrects this pharmacokinetic set and allows its use in obese patients. The 'fictitious height' can be a valid alternative for use of TCI infusion of remifentanil in morbidly obese patients until commercially available infusion pumps and research software are updated and new LBM equations are implemented in their algorithms.",
author = "Colla, {Luca La} and Andrea Albertin and Colla, {Giorgio La} and Andrea Porta and Giorgio Aldegheri and Candia, {Domenico Di} and Fausto Gigli",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.2165/11317690-000000000-00000",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "131--139",
journal = "Clinical Pharmacokinetics",
issn = "0312-5963",
publisher = "Adis International Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Predictive performance of the 'Minto' remifentanil pharmacokinetic parameter set in morbidly obese patients ensuing from a new method for calculating lean body mass

AU - Colla, Luca La

AU - Albertin, Andrea

AU - Colla, Giorgio La

AU - Porta, Andrea

AU - Aldegheri, Giorgio

AU - Candia, Domenico Di

AU - Gigli, Fausto

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Background and Objectives: In a previous article, we showed that the pharmacokinetic set of remifentanil used for target-controlled infusion (TCI) might be biased in obese patients because it incorporates flawed equations for the calculation of lean body mass (LBM), which is a covariate of several pharmacokinetic parameters in this set. The objectives of this study were to determine the predictive performance of the original pharmacokinetic set, which incorporates the James equation for LBM calculation, and to determine the predictive performance of the pharmacokinetic set when a new method to calculate LBM was used (the Janmahasatian equations). Methods: This was an observational study with intraoperative observations and no follow-up. Fifteen morbidly obese inpatients scheduled for bariatric surgery were included in the study. The intervention included manually controlled continuous infusion of remifentanil during the surgery and analysis of arterial blood samples to determine the arterial remifentanil concentration, to be compared with concentrations predicted by either the unadjusted or the adjusted pharmacokinetic set. The statistical analysis included parametric and non-parametric tests on continuous variables and determination of the median performance error (MDPE), median absolute performance error (MDAPE), divergence and wobble. Results: The median values (interquartile ranges) of the MDPE, MDAPE, divergence and wobble forthe James equations during maintenance were-53.4% (-58.7% to-49.2%), 53.4% (49.0-58.7%) 3.3% (2.9-4.7%) and 1.4% h-1 (1.1-2.5% h-1), respectively. The respective values for the Janmahasatian equations were-18.9% (-24.2% to-10.4%), 20.5% (13.3-24.8%), 2.6% (-0.7% to 4.5%) and 1.9% h -1 (1.4-3.0%h-1). The performance (in terms of theMDPEand MDAPE) of the corrected pharmacokinetic set was better than that of the uncorrected one.Conclusion: The predictive performance of the original pharmacokinetic set is not clinically acceptable. Use of a corrected LBM value in morbidly obese patients corrects this pharmacokinetic set and allows its use in obese patients. The 'fictitious height' can be a valid alternative for use of TCI infusion of remifentanil in morbidly obese patients until commercially available infusion pumps and research software are updated and new LBM equations are implemented in their algorithms.

AB - Background and Objectives: In a previous article, we showed that the pharmacokinetic set of remifentanil used for target-controlled infusion (TCI) might be biased in obese patients because it incorporates flawed equations for the calculation of lean body mass (LBM), which is a covariate of several pharmacokinetic parameters in this set. The objectives of this study were to determine the predictive performance of the original pharmacokinetic set, which incorporates the James equation for LBM calculation, and to determine the predictive performance of the pharmacokinetic set when a new method to calculate LBM was used (the Janmahasatian equations). Methods: This was an observational study with intraoperative observations and no follow-up. Fifteen morbidly obese inpatients scheduled for bariatric surgery were included in the study. The intervention included manually controlled continuous infusion of remifentanil during the surgery and analysis of arterial blood samples to determine the arterial remifentanil concentration, to be compared with concentrations predicted by either the unadjusted or the adjusted pharmacokinetic set. The statistical analysis included parametric and non-parametric tests on continuous variables and determination of the median performance error (MDPE), median absolute performance error (MDAPE), divergence and wobble. Results: The median values (interquartile ranges) of the MDPE, MDAPE, divergence and wobble forthe James equations during maintenance were-53.4% (-58.7% to-49.2%), 53.4% (49.0-58.7%) 3.3% (2.9-4.7%) and 1.4% h-1 (1.1-2.5% h-1), respectively. The respective values for the Janmahasatian equations were-18.9% (-24.2% to-10.4%), 20.5% (13.3-24.8%), 2.6% (-0.7% to 4.5%) and 1.9% h -1 (1.4-3.0%h-1). The performance (in terms of theMDPEand MDAPE) of the corrected pharmacokinetic set was better than that of the uncorrected one.Conclusion: The predictive performance of the original pharmacokinetic set is not clinically acceptable. Use of a corrected LBM value in morbidly obese patients corrects this pharmacokinetic set and allows its use in obese patients. The 'fictitious height' can be a valid alternative for use of TCI infusion of remifentanil in morbidly obese patients until commercially available infusion pumps and research software are updated and new LBM equations are implemented in their algorithms.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=74249110600&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=74249110600&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2165/11317690-000000000-00000

DO - 10.2165/11317690-000000000-00000

M3 - Article

VL - 49

SP - 131

EP - 139

JO - Clinical Pharmacokinetics

JF - Clinical Pharmacokinetics

SN - 0312-5963

IS - 2

ER -