TY - JOUR
T1 - Preliminary experience with the use of ultra-low profile endografts
AU - Mazzaccaro, Daniela
AU - Malacrida, Giovanni
AU - Amato, Bruno
AU - Angileri, Salvatore Alessio
AU - Ierardi, Anna Maria
AU - Nano, Giovanni
PY - 2017/11/1
Y1 - 2017/11/1
N2 - PURPOSE We aimed to report a preliminary single-center experience of elective endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) using ultra-low profile (ULP) endografts of 14 F outer diameter. METHODS Data of 67 consecutive patients who underwent EVAR using either Ovation (group A, n=30) or Incraft (group B, n=37) endografts were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS Aorto-iliac anatomy was significantly different between the two groups, as patients of group A had a greater thrombotic apposition on proximal aortic neck (thrombus thickness: 7.2±1 mm vs. 3.3±1.6 mm, P = 0.042; percentage of the circumference covered by thrombus: 45.2%±10.4% vs. 18.7%±10.6%, P = 0.0003), while patients of group B had a more angulated proximal neck in the coronal axis (35.9 ±6.4 vs. 16.7 ±5, P = 0.012). Procedural success was 93.3% and 97.3%, respectively, in groups A and B. One patient in group A required an immediate conversion to open surgery for persistent occlusion of both iliac limbs. Another patient required implantation of a conical endograft with a femoro-femoral right-to-left bypass for occlusion of the contralateral gate during the cannulation. In group B, one intraoperative type Ia endoleak was immediately corrected. Neither deaths nor major adverse events were recorded within 30-days. During a median follow-up of 15.2 months (range, 1-56.7 months) two type Ia endoleaks in group A required open conversion after 12.1 and 40.5 months, respectively. Three patients in group B required a reintervention after 30 days. Neither deaths nor aortic ruptures were recorded during follow-up. CONCLUSION Both ULP endografts showed satisfying early and mid-term results.
AB - PURPOSE We aimed to report a preliminary single-center experience of elective endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) using ultra-low profile (ULP) endografts of 14 F outer diameter. METHODS Data of 67 consecutive patients who underwent EVAR using either Ovation (group A, n=30) or Incraft (group B, n=37) endografts were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS Aorto-iliac anatomy was significantly different between the two groups, as patients of group A had a greater thrombotic apposition on proximal aortic neck (thrombus thickness: 7.2±1 mm vs. 3.3±1.6 mm, P = 0.042; percentage of the circumference covered by thrombus: 45.2%±10.4% vs. 18.7%±10.6%, P = 0.0003), while patients of group B had a more angulated proximal neck in the coronal axis (35.9 ±6.4 vs. 16.7 ±5, P = 0.012). Procedural success was 93.3% and 97.3%, respectively, in groups A and B. One patient in group A required an immediate conversion to open surgery for persistent occlusion of both iliac limbs. Another patient required implantation of a conical endograft with a femoro-femoral right-to-left bypass for occlusion of the contralateral gate during the cannulation. In group B, one intraoperative type Ia endoleak was immediately corrected. Neither deaths nor major adverse events were recorded within 30-days. During a median follow-up of 15.2 months (range, 1-56.7 months) two type Ia endoleaks in group A required open conversion after 12.1 and 40.5 months, respectively. Three patients in group B required a reintervention after 30 days. Neither deaths nor aortic ruptures were recorded during follow-up. CONCLUSION Both ULP endografts showed satisfying early and mid-term results.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032961685&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85032961685&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5152/dir.2017.16523
DO - 10.5152/dir.2017.16523
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85032961685
VL - 23
SP - 448
EP - 453
JO - Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology
JF - Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology
SN - 1305-3825
IS - 6
ER -