Premature ejaculation results in female sexual distress: Standardization and validation of a new diagnostic tool for sexual distress

Erika Limoncin, Marco Tomassetti, Giovanni Luca Gravina, Giacomo Ciocca, Eleonora Carosa, Stefania Di Sante, Vincenzo Gentile, Vincenzo Mirone, Francesco Montorsi, Andrea Lenzi, Emmanuele A. Jannini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: We measured premature ejaculation related female sexual distress using a new diagnostic tool, the Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised-Premature Ejaculation questionnaire. Materials and Methods: In this large-scale, Internet based population study we evaluated 2,109 women in a stable relationship during the last 6 months. The 1,361 women in the premature ejaculation group had no female sexual disorder but the partner had premature ejaculation alone. The 748 controls had no female sexual disorder and a partner without premature ejaculation. We determined questionnaire content and discriminant validity, internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Multivariate logistic regression with propensity score reweighting was done to determine the clinical impact of demographics on the perception of sexual distress. Results: The questionnaire was well understood. Internal consistency was greater than 0.90 and 0.84 in the premature ejaculation and control groups, respectively. Test-retest reliability was 0.82 (95% CI 0.72-0.87) and 0.85 (95% CI 0.79-0.92) in the premature ejaculation and control groups, respectively. The questionnaire had a high AUC of 0.90 (95% CI 0.89-0.91). The new cutoff score of 12 or greater had 79.1% sensitivity (95% CI 73.8-82.5), 99.5% specificity (95% CI 98.0-100.0), 99.3% positive predictive value (95% CI 98.7-100.0) and 67.9% negative predictive value (95% CI 64.2-73.2). Median questionnaire scores were significantly higher in the premature ejaculation group than in controls (20, 95% CI 19-21 vs 6, 95% CI 6-7, p

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1830-1835
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume189
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2013

Fingerprint

Premature Ejaculation
Reproducibility of Results
Control Groups
Propensity Score
Sexual Partners
Internet
Area Under Curve
Logistic Models
Demography
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • ejaculation
  • female
  • psychometrics
  • questionnaires
  • testis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Limoncin, E., Tomassetti, M., Gravina, G. L., Ciocca, G., Carosa, E., Di Sante, S., ... Jannini, E. A. (2013). Premature ejaculation results in female sexual distress: Standardization and validation of a new diagnostic tool for sexual distress. Journal of Urology, 189(5), 1830-1835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.11.007

Premature ejaculation results in female sexual distress : Standardization and validation of a new diagnostic tool for sexual distress. / Limoncin, Erika; Tomassetti, Marco; Gravina, Giovanni Luca; Ciocca, Giacomo; Carosa, Eleonora; Di Sante, Stefania; Gentile, Vincenzo; Mirone, Vincenzo; Montorsi, Francesco; Lenzi, Andrea; Jannini, Emmanuele A.

In: Journal of Urology, Vol. 189, No. 5, 05.2013, p. 1830-1835.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Limoncin, E, Tomassetti, M, Gravina, GL, Ciocca, G, Carosa, E, Di Sante, S, Gentile, V, Mirone, V, Montorsi, F, Lenzi, A & Jannini, EA 2013, 'Premature ejaculation results in female sexual distress: Standardization and validation of a new diagnostic tool for sexual distress', Journal of Urology, vol. 189, no. 5, pp. 1830-1835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.11.007
Limoncin, Erika ; Tomassetti, Marco ; Gravina, Giovanni Luca ; Ciocca, Giacomo ; Carosa, Eleonora ; Di Sante, Stefania ; Gentile, Vincenzo ; Mirone, Vincenzo ; Montorsi, Francesco ; Lenzi, Andrea ; Jannini, Emmanuele A. / Premature ejaculation results in female sexual distress : Standardization and validation of a new diagnostic tool for sexual distress. In: Journal of Urology. 2013 ; Vol. 189, No. 5. pp. 1830-1835.
@article{9ac9d383b133446b9a644347d97701ea,
title = "Premature ejaculation results in female sexual distress: Standardization and validation of a new diagnostic tool for sexual distress",
abstract = "Purpose: We measured premature ejaculation related female sexual distress using a new diagnostic tool, the Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised-Premature Ejaculation questionnaire. Materials and Methods: In this large-scale, Internet based population study we evaluated 2,109 women in a stable relationship during the last 6 months. The 1,361 women in the premature ejaculation group had no female sexual disorder but the partner had premature ejaculation alone. The 748 controls had no female sexual disorder and a partner without premature ejaculation. We determined questionnaire content and discriminant validity, internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Multivariate logistic regression with propensity score reweighting was done to determine the clinical impact of demographics on the perception of sexual distress. Results: The questionnaire was well understood. Internal consistency was greater than 0.90 and 0.84 in the premature ejaculation and control groups, respectively. Test-retest reliability was 0.82 (95{\%} CI 0.72-0.87) and 0.85 (95{\%} CI 0.79-0.92) in the premature ejaculation and control groups, respectively. The questionnaire had a high AUC of 0.90 (95{\%} CI 0.89-0.91). The new cutoff score of 12 or greater had 79.1{\%} sensitivity (95{\%} CI 73.8-82.5), 99.5{\%} specificity (95{\%} CI 98.0-100.0), 99.3{\%} positive predictive value (95{\%} CI 98.7-100.0) and 67.9{\%} negative predictive value (95{\%} CI 64.2-73.2). Median questionnaire scores were significantly higher in the premature ejaculation group than in controls (20, 95{\%} CI 19-21 vs 6, 95{\%} CI 6-7, p",
keywords = "ejaculation, female, psychometrics, questionnaires, testis",
author = "Erika Limoncin and Marco Tomassetti and Gravina, {Giovanni Luca} and Giacomo Ciocca and Eleonora Carosa and {Di Sante}, Stefania and Vincenzo Gentile and Vincenzo Mirone and Francesco Montorsi and Andrea Lenzi and Jannini, {Emmanuele A.}",
year = "2013",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.juro.2012.11.007",
language = "English",
volume = "189",
pages = "1830--1835",
journal = "Journal of Urology",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Premature ejaculation results in female sexual distress

T2 - Standardization and validation of a new diagnostic tool for sexual distress

AU - Limoncin, Erika

AU - Tomassetti, Marco

AU - Gravina, Giovanni Luca

AU - Ciocca, Giacomo

AU - Carosa, Eleonora

AU - Di Sante, Stefania

AU - Gentile, Vincenzo

AU - Mirone, Vincenzo

AU - Montorsi, Francesco

AU - Lenzi, Andrea

AU - Jannini, Emmanuele A.

PY - 2013/5

Y1 - 2013/5

N2 - Purpose: We measured premature ejaculation related female sexual distress using a new diagnostic tool, the Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised-Premature Ejaculation questionnaire. Materials and Methods: In this large-scale, Internet based population study we evaluated 2,109 women in a stable relationship during the last 6 months. The 1,361 women in the premature ejaculation group had no female sexual disorder but the partner had premature ejaculation alone. The 748 controls had no female sexual disorder and a partner without premature ejaculation. We determined questionnaire content and discriminant validity, internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Multivariate logistic regression with propensity score reweighting was done to determine the clinical impact of demographics on the perception of sexual distress. Results: The questionnaire was well understood. Internal consistency was greater than 0.90 and 0.84 in the premature ejaculation and control groups, respectively. Test-retest reliability was 0.82 (95% CI 0.72-0.87) and 0.85 (95% CI 0.79-0.92) in the premature ejaculation and control groups, respectively. The questionnaire had a high AUC of 0.90 (95% CI 0.89-0.91). The new cutoff score of 12 or greater had 79.1% sensitivity (95% CI 73.8-82.5), 99.5% specificity (95% CI 98.0-100.0), 99.3% positive predictive value (95% CI 98.7-100.0) and 67.9% negative predictive value (95% CI 64.2-73.2). Median questionnaire scores were significantly higher in the premature ejaculation group than in controls (20, 95% CI 19-21 vs 6, 95% CI 6-7, p

AB - Purpose: We measured premature ejaculation related female sexual distress using a new diagnostic tool, the Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised-Premature Ejaculation questionnaire. Materials and Methods: In this large-scale, Internet based population study we evaluated 2,109 women in a stable relationship during the last 6 months. The 1,361 women in the premature ejaculation group had no female sexual disorder but the partner had premature ejaculation alone. The 748 controls had no female sexual disorder and a partner without premature ejaculation. We determined questionnaire content and discriminant validity, internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Multivariate logistic regression with propensity score reweighting was done to determine the clinical impact of demographics on the perception of sexual distress. Results: The questionnaire was well understood. Internal consistency was greater than 0.90 and 0.84 in the premature ejaculation and control groups, respectively. Test-retest reliability was 0.82 (95% CI 0.72-0.87) and 0.85 (95% CI 0.79-0.92) in the premature ejaculation and control groups, respectively. The questionnaire had a high AUC of 0.90 (95% CI 0.89-0.91). The new cutoff score of 12 or greater had 79.1% sensitivity (95% CI 73.8-82.5), 99.5% specificity (95% CI 98.0-100.0), 99.3% positive predictive value (95% CI 98.7-100.0) and 67.9% negative predictive value (95% CI 64.2-73.2). Median questionnaire scores were significantly higher in the premature ejaculation group than in controls (20, 95% CI 19-21 vs 6, 95% CI 6-7, p

KW - ejaculation

KW - female

KW - psychometrics

KW - questionnaires

KW - testis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876292056&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84876292056&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.juro.2012.11.007

DO - 10.1016/j.juro.2012.11.007

M3 - Article

C2 - 23142691

AN - SCOPUS:84876292056

VL - 189

SP - 1830

EP - 1835

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 5

ER -