TY - JOUR
T1 - Prescription and choice of diagnostic imaging by physician specialty in Alzheimer's Centers (Unitá di Valutazione Alzheimer - UVA) in Northern Italy
AU - Frisoni, Giovanni B.
AU - Galluzzi, Samantha
AU - Riello, Roberta
PY - 2005
Y1 - 2005
N2 - Background and aims: Physician's specialty has been shown to have an effect on health outcomes and financial expenditure in a number of conditions. This is particularly true in the differential diagnosis of cognitive deterioration, in which technological procedures are needed. The aim of this study is to assess the effect of physician specialty on the prescription of diagnostic imaging (CT and MR) in patients with cognitive impairment, referred to Alzheimer Evaluation Units (Unitá di Valutazione Alzheimer) in Northern Italy. Methods: An ad-hoc questionnaire was sent to UVA referents in northern Italy (Lombardy, Piedmont, Trentino, Emilia-Romagna and Veneto), requesting information on the frequency of prescriptions for CT and MR and reasons for the choice, on a 0 to 7 scale. Results: The physician-in-charge was a neurologist in 22 and a geriatrician in 22 Alzheimer's centers. Intensive use of CT was similar in neurologists and geriatricians (64 vs 68%), whereas intensive use of MR was more frequent in neurologists (41 vs 10%; p=0.03). Overall, organizational factors (availability of the scanner on-site and waiting list for imaging, mean weight=1.6±1.4) were as important as patient-related factors (age, severity of cognitive impairment, and clinical suspicion of cerebrovascular disease, mean weight 1.7±1.4; p=0.84). Sixty-five percent of neurologists based their choices between CT and MR on patient-related and 35% on organizational factors, whereas the opposite proportion was found for geriatricians (29 vs 71%, p=0.04). Conclusions: The high weight of organizational factors on the prescription of diagnostic imaging is not consistent with an evidence-based diagnostic system.
AB - Background and aims: Physician's specialty has been shown to have an effect on health outcomes and financial expenditure in a number of conditions. This is particularly true in the differential diagnosis of cognitive deterioration, in which technological procedures are needed. The aim of this study is to assess the effect of physician specialty on the prescription of diagnostic imaging (CT and MR) in patients with cognitive impairment, referred to Alzheimer Evaluation Units (Unitá di Valutazione Alzheimer) in Northern Italy. Methods: An ad-hoc questionnaire was sent to UVA referents in northern Italy (Lombardy, Piedmont, Trentino, Emilia-Romagna and Veneto), requesting information on the frequency of prescriptions for CT and MR and reasons for the choice, on a 0 to 7 scale. Results: The physician-in-charge was a neurologist in 22 and a geriatrician in 22 Alzheimer's centers. Intensive use of CT was similar in neurologists and geriatricians (64 vs 68%), whereas intensive use of MR was more frequent in neurologists (41 vs 10%; p=0.03). Overall, organizational factors (availability of the scanner on-site and waiting list for imaging, mean weight=1.6±1.4) were as important as patient-related factors (age, severity of cognitive impairment, and clinical suspicion of cerebrovascular disease, mean weight 1.7±1.4; p=0.84). Sixty-five percent of neurologists based their choices between CT and MR on patient-related and 35% on organizational factors, whereas the opposite proportion was found for geriatricians (29 vs 71%, p=0.04). Conclusions: The high weight of organizational factors on the prescription of diagnostic imaging is not consistent with an evidence-based diagnostic system.
KW - Alzheimer's disease
KW - Imaging
KW - Physician specialty
KW - UVA
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=21244475902&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=21244475902&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 15847117
AN - SCOPUS:21244475902
VL - 17
SP - 14
EP - 19
JO - Aging clinical and experimental research
JF - Aging clinical and experimental research
SN - 1594-0667
IS - 1
ER -