PREVALENZA DELLA DERMATITE ALLERGICA DA CONTATTO ALLA GOMMA NEL TRIENNIO 1989-1991 A MILANO

Translated title of the contribution: Prevalence of allergic contact dermatitis from rubber in the 1989-1991 in Milan

A. F. Finzi, A. S. Bigardi, M. C. Fumagalli, P. D. Pigatto

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Rubber is not itself a cause of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). ACD is caused by the various categories of chemicals used in the processing or rubber, especially vulcanization accelerating agents and antioxidants. In each individual mixture of rubber there may be at least 20 or 30 different components, and those of special interest to the allergist are thiuramic derivatives, derivatives of thiocarbamic acid, of urea and of phenyldiamine, mercaptobenzothiazole and its analogues and, finally, diaminodiphenylmethane (DDM). During the period 1989-1991 we carried out an epidemiological study to evaluate the sensitizing or irritating effects of the haptens employed in processing rubber. This investigation showed that there has been 59% increase of rubber positive reactions between 1989 and 1990. The ever increasing professional use of rubber gloves to protect the skin from irritants and microbiological contaminants has increased the risk of sensitization and could account for the increased incidence observed by us. Housewives are the category most at risk for ACD to rubber, and the use of gloves is the major type of exposure. After housewives, the health care personnel is the most widely involved probably due to the increased use of gloves to prevent spread of HIV virus infection. The thiuram mix is the hapten most often causes allergy in women and the PPD mix in men, who are the most involved in professional sensitization to DDM. Extra-professional ACD is due to gloves, boots, condoms, clothing, etc. Therefore, the reactiveness to the different haptens is expressed differently in the professional and nonprofessional groups. The allergenic potential is related to the processing procedures, which require additives to obtain the finished product. The frequency of atopic positivity in personal or familial environments is not significantly different from that in the general population.

Original languageItalian
Pages (from-to)183-188
Number of pages6
JournalAnnali Italiani di Dermatologia Clinica e Sperimentale
Volume47
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 1993

Fingerprint

Allergic Contact Dermatitis
Rubber
Haptens
Thiram
Clothing
Irritants
Tuberculin
Condoms
Virus Diseases
Health Personnel
HIV Infections
Urea
Epidemiologic Studies
Hypersensitivity
Antioxidants
Delivery of Health Care
Skin
Acids
Incidence
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dermatology

Cite this

PREVALENZA DELLA DERMATITE ALLERGICA DA CONTATTO ALLA GOMMA NEL TRIENNIO 1989-1991 A MILANO. / Finzi, A. F.; Bigardi, A. S.; Fumagalli, M. C.; Pigatto, P. D.

In: Annali Italiani di Dermatologia Clinica e Sperimentale, Vol. 47, No. 3, 1993, p. 183-188.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a7c97971cbf8441d908fbe82eefae0de,
title = "PREVALENZA DELLA DERMATITE ALLERGICA DA CONTATTO ALLA GOMMA NEL TRIENNIO 1989-1991 A MILANO",
abstract = "Rubber is not itself a cause of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). ACD is caused by the various categories of chemicals used in the processing or rubber, especially vulcanization accelerating agents and antioxidants. In each individual mixture of rubber there may be at least 20 or 30 different components, and those of special interest to the allergist are thiuramic derivatives, derivatives of thiocarbamic acid, of urea and of phenyldiamine, mercaptobenzothiazole and its analogues and, finally, diaminodiphenylmethane (DDM). During the period 1989-1991 we carried out an epidemiological study to evaluate the sensitizing or irritating effects of the haptens employed in processing rubber. This investigation showed that there has been 59{\%} increase of rubber positive reactions between 1989 and 1990. The ever increasing professional use of rubber gloves to protect the skin from irritants and microbiological contaminants has increased the risk of sensitization and could account for the increased incidence observed by us. Housewives are the category most at risk for ACD to rubber, and the use of gloves is the major type of exposure. After housewives, the health care personnel is the most widely involved probably due to the increased use of gloves to prevent spread of HIV virus infection. The thiuram mix is the hapten most often causes allergy in women and the PPD mix in men, who are the most involved in professional sensitization to DDM. Extra-professional ACD is due to gloves, boots, condoms, clothing, etc. Therefore, the reactiveness to the different haptens is expressed differently in the professional and nonprofessional groups. The allergenic potential is related to the processing procedures, which require additives to obtain the finished product. The frequency of atopic positivity in personal or familial environments is not significantly different from that in the general population.",
keywords = "allergic contact dermatitis, epidemiology, occupational skin disease, rubber",
author = "Finzi, {A. F.} and Bigardi, {A. S.} and Fumagalli, {M. C.} and Pigatto, {P. D.}",
year = "1993",
language = "Italian",
volume = "47",
pages = "183--188",
journal = "Annali Italiani di Dermatologia Allergologica Clinica e Sperimentale",
issn = "1592-6826",
publisher = "Il Pensiero Scientifico Editore s.r.l.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - PREVALENZA DELLA DERMATITE ALLERGICA DA CONTATTO ALLA GOMMA NEL TRIENNIO 1989-1991 A MILANO

AU - Finzi, A. F.

AU - Bigardi, A. S.

AU - Fumagalli, M. C.

AU - Pigatto, P. D.

PY - 1993

Y1 - 1993

N2 - Rubber is not itself a cause of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). ACD is caused by the various categories of chemicals used in the processing or rubber, especially vulcanization accelerating agents and antioxidants. In each individual mixture of rubber there may be at least 20 or 30 different components, and those of special interest to the allergist are thiuramic derivatives, derivatives of thiocarbamic acid, of urea and of phenyldiamine, mercaptobenzothiazole and its analogues and, finally, diaminodiphenylmethane (DDM). During the period 1989-1991 we carried out an epidemiological study to evaluate the sensitizing or irritating effects of the haptens employed in processing rubber. This investigation showed that there has been 59% increase of rubber positive reactions between 1989 and 1990. The ever increasing professional use of rubber gloves to protect the skin from irritants and microbiological contaminants has increased the risk of sensitization and could account for the increased incidence observed by us. Housewives are the category most at risk for ACD to rubber, and the use of gloves is the major type of exposure. After housewives, the health care personnel is the most widely involved probably due to the increased use of gloves to prevent spread of HIV virus infection. The thiuram mix is the hapten most often causes allergy in women and the PPD mix in men, who are the most involved in professional sensitization to DDM. Extra-professional ACD is due to gloves, boots, condoms, clothing, etc. Therefore, the reactiveness to the different haptens is expressed differently in the professional and nonprofessional groups. The allergenic potential is related to the processing procedures, which require additives to obtain the finished product. The frequency of atopic positivity in personal or familial environments is not significantly different from that in the general population.

AB - Rubber is not itself a cause of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). ACD is caused by the various categories of chemicals used in the processing or rubber, especially vulcanization accelerating agents and antioxidants. In each individual mixture of rubber there may be at least 20 or 30 different components, and those of special interest to the allergist are thiuramic derivatives, derivatives of thiocarbamic acid, of urea and of phenyldiamine, mercaptobenzothiazole and its analogues and, finally, diaminodiphenylmethane (DDM). During the period 1989-1991 we carried out an epidemiological study to evaluate the sensitizing or irritating effects of the haptens employed in processing rubber. This investigation showed that there has been 59% increase of rubber positive reactions between 1989 and 1990. The ever increasing professional use of rubber gloves to protect the skin from irritants and microbiological contaminants has increased the risk of sensitization and could account for the increased incidence observed by us. Housewives are the category most at risk for ACD to rubber, and the use of gloves is the major type of exposure. After housewives, the health care personnel is the most widely involved probably due to the increased use of gloves to prevent spread of HIV virus infection. The thiuram mix is the hapten most often causes allergy in women and the PPD mix in men, who are the most involved in professional sensitization to DDM. Extra-professional ACD is due to gloves, boots, condoms, clothing, etc. Therefore, the reactiveness to the different haptens is expressed differently in the professional and nonprofessional groups. The allergenic potential is related to the processing procedures, which require additives to obtain the finished product. The frequency of atopic positivity in personal or familial environments is not significantly different from that in the general population.

KW - allergic contact dermatitis

KW - epidemiology

KW - occupational skin disease

KW - rubber

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027235926&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027235926&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Articolo

VL - 47

SP - 183

EP - 188

JO - Annali Italiani di Dermatologia Allergologica Clinica e Sperimentale

JF - Annali Italiani di Dermatologia Allergologica Clinica e Sperimentale

SN - 1592-6826

IS - 3

ER -