Prevalence of chlamydial antibody in pregnancy - A matched-pair study

P. Olliaro, A. Regazzetti, A. L. Marchetti, P. Lanzarini, A. Spinillo, G. Gorini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In this matched-pair study 139 pregnant women were matched on the basis of age to an equal number of non-pregnant women with no signs of genital infection. The mean age was 28.7 years (range 20-41). The cut-offs used for detection of chlamydial antibody were 1:64 and 1:128 for IgG and 1:16 for IgA. IgG antibody at 64 was detected in 37.4% of pregnant women, compared to 46% of controls (p=0.145). There was, however, a statistically significant difference between the groups for IgG at 128 (gravidae=15.8%; controls=28%;p=0.014). IgA were detected in 8.6% and 16.5% of subjects, respectively (p=0.047). IgG levels did not vary with increasing age among the pregnant women, but rose significantly with age in non-pregnant controls (logistic regression p-values=0.011 and 0.006, for IgG at 64 and 128, respectively). IgG-positive women in the control group tended to be older than pregnant IgG-positive women (p=0.06). These differences could not be explained by marital status, parity or use of oral contraceptives. In view of the lack of epidemiological differences, biological explanations might be invoked.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)47-50
Number of pages4
JournalEuropean Journal of Epidemiology
Volume10
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 1994

Fingerprint

Immunoglobulin G
Pregnancy
Antibodies
Pregnant Women
Immunoglobulin A
Marital Status
Oral Contraceptives
Parity
Logistic Models
Control Groups
Infection

Keywords

  • Chlamydial antibody
  • Genital infection
  • Pregnancy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology

Cite this

Olliaro, P., Regazzetti, A., Marchetti, A. L., Lanzarini, P., Spinillo, A., & Gorini, G. (1994). Prevalence of chlamydial antibody in pregnancy - A matched-pair study. European Journal of Epidemiology, 10(1), 47-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01717451

Prevalence of chlamydial antibody in pregnancy - A matched-pair study. / Olliaro, P.; Regazzetti, A.; Marchetti, A. L.; Lanzarini, P.; Spinillo, A.; Gorini, G.

In: European Journal of Epidemiology, Vol. 10, No. 1, 02.1994, p. 47-50.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Olliaro, P, Regazzetti, A, Marchetti, AL, Lanzarini, P, Spinillo, A & Gorini, G 1994, 'Prevalence of chlamydial antibody in pregnancy - A matched-pair study', European Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 47-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01717451
Olliaro, P. ; Regazzetti, A. ; Marchetti, A. L. ; Lanzarini, P. ; Spinillo, A. ; Gorini, G. / Prevalence of chlamydial antibody in pregnancy - A matched-pair study. In: European Journal of Epidemiology. 1994 ; Vol. 10, No. 1. pp. 47-50.
@article{74b83d2bfd3946c8a8fc31b5dc62bf28,
title = "Prevalence of chlamydial antibody in pregnancy - A matched-pair study",
abstract = "In this matched-pair study 139 pregnant women were matched on the basis of age to an equal number of non-pregnant women with no signs of genital infection. The mean age was 28.7 years (range 20-41). The cut-offs used for detection of chlamydial antibody were 1:64 and 1:128 for IgG and 1:16 for IgA. IgG antibody at 64 was detected in 37.4{\%} of pregnant women, compared to 46{\%} of controls (p=0.145). There was, however, a statistically significant difference between the groups for IgG at 128 (gravidae=15.8{\%}; controls=28{\%};p=0.014). IgA were detected in 8.6{\%} and 16.5{\%} of subjects, respectively (p=0.047). IgG levels did not vary with increasing age among the pregnant women, but rose significantly with age in non-pregnant controls (logistic regression p-values=0.011 and 0.006, for IgG at 64 and 128, respectively). IgG-positive women in the control group tended to be older than pregnant IgG-positive women (p=0.06). These differences could not be explained by marital status, parity or use of oral contraceptives. In view of the lack of epidemiological differences, biological explanations might be invoked.",
keywords = "Chlamydial antibody, Genital infection, Pregnancy",
author = "P. Olliaro and A. Regazzetti and Marchetti, {A. L.} and P. Lanzarini and A. Spinillo and G. Gorini",
year = "1994",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1007/BF01717451",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "47--50",
journal = "European Journal of Epidemiology",
issn = "0393-2990",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prevalence of chlamydial antibody in pregnancy - A matched-pair study

AU - Olliaro, P.

AU - Regazzetti, A.

AU - Marchetti, A. L.

AU - Lanzarini, P.

AU - Spinillo, A.

AU - Gorini, G.

PY - 1994/2

Y1 - 1994/2

N2 - In this matched-pair study 139 pregnant women were matched on the basis of age to an equal number of non-pregnant women with no signs of genital infection. The mean age was 28.7 years (range 20-41). The cut-offs used for detection of chlamydial antibody were 1:64 and 1:128 for IgG and 1:16 for IgA. IgG antibody at 64 was detected in 37.4% of pregnant women, compared to 46% of controls (p=0.145). There was, however, a statistically significant difference between the groups for IgG at 128 (gravidae=15.8%; controls=28%;p=0.014). IgA were detected in 8.6% and 16.5% of subjects, respectively (p=0.047). IgG levels did not vary with increasing age among the pregnant women, but rose significantly with age in non-pregnant controls (logistic regression p-values=0.011 and 0.006, for IgG at 64 and 128, respectively). IgG-positive women in the control group tended to be older than pregnant IgG-positive women (p=0.06). These differences could not be explained by marital status, parity or use of oral contraceptives. In view of the lack of epidemiological differences, biological explanations might be invoked.

AB - In this matched-pair study 139 pregnant women were matched on the basis of age to an equal number of non-pregnant women with no signs of genital infection. The mean age was 28.7 years (range 20-41). The cut-offs used for detection of chlamydial antibody were 1:64 and 1:128 for IgG and 1:16 for IgA. IgG antibody at 64 was detected in 37.4% of pregnant women, compared to 46% of controls (p=0.145). There was, however, a statistically significant difference between the groups for IgG at 128 (gravidae=15.8%; controls=28%;p=0.014). IgA were detected in 8.6% and 16.5% of subjects, respectively (p=0.047). IgG levels did not vary with increasing age among the pregnant women, but rose significantly with age in non-pregnant controls (logistic regression p-values=0.011 and 0.006, for IgG at 64 and 128, respectively). IgG-positive women in the control group tended to be older than pregnant IgG-positive women (p=0.06). These differences could not be explained by marital status, parity or use of oral contraceptives. In view of the lack of epidemiological differences, biological explanations might be invoked.

KW - Chlamydial antibody

KW - Genital infection

KW - Pregnancy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028086356&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028086356&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF01717451

DO - 10.1007/BF01717451

M3 - Article

C2 - 7957790

AN - SCOPUS:0028086356

VL - 10

SP - 47

EP - 50

JO - European Journal of Epidemiology

JF - European Journal of Epidemiology

SN - 0393-2990

IS - 1

ER -