Primacy of warmth versus competence: A motivated bias?

Juliette Richetin, Federica Durante, Silvia Mari, Marco Perugini, Chiara Volpato

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In line with previous results that challenge the traditional primacy of warmth over competence in outgroup perception, we propose to bridge elements from stereotype content model and social identity theory: Perceivers will use the competence and warmth dimensions differentially when interpreting higher or lower status outgroup members' behavior. We test the hypothesis that the dimension that is less favorable for the outgroup and more favorable for the ingroup will be used. In particular, we investigate whether the warmth dimension would better predict the interpretation of higher status outgroup members' behavior than the competence dimension, whereas the competence dimension would better predict the interpretation of lower status outgroup members' behavior than the warmth dimension. Two studies separately test these effects. Results suggest the existence of a motivated bias in interpreting outgroup members' behavior, especially when there is ingroup identification.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)417-435
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Social Psychology
Volume152
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 1 2012

Fingerprint

Mental Competency
Social Identification

Keywords

  • competence
  • ingroup bias
  • intergroup perception
  • status
  • warmth

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Primacy of warmth versus competence : A motivated bias? / Richetin, Juliette; Durante, Federica; Mari, Silvia; Perugini, Marco; Volpato, Chiara.

In: Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 152, No. 4, 01.07.2012, p. 417-435.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Richetin, Juliette ; Durante, Federica ; Mari, Silvia ; Perugini, Marco ; Volpato, Chiara. / Primacy of warmth versus competence : A motivated bias?. In: Journal of Social Psychology. 2012 ; Vol. 152, No. 4. pp. 417-435.
@article{8d0921cc7a214bd795a41e854ba46323,
title = "Primacy of warmth versus competence: A motivated bias?",
abstract = "In line with previous results that challenge the traditional primacy of warmth over competence in outgroup perception, we propose to bridge elements from stereotype content model and social identity theory: Perceivers will use the competence and warmth dimensions differentially when interpreting higher or lower status outgroup members' behavior. We test the hypothesis that the dimension that is less favorable for the outgroup and more favorable for the ingroup will be used. In particular, we investigate whether the warmth dimension would better predict the interpretation of higher status outgroup members' behavior than the competence dimension, whereas the competence dimension would better predict the interpretation of lower status outgroup members' behavior than the warmth dimension. Two studies separately test these effects. Results suggest the existence of a motivated bias in interpreting outgroup members' behavior, especially when there is ingroup identification.",
keywords = "competence, ingroup bias, intergroup perception, status, warmth",
author = "Juliette Richetin and Federica Durante and Silvia Mari and Marco Perugini and Chiara Volpato",
year = "2012",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/00224545.2011.623735",
language = "English",
volume = "152",
pages = "417--435",
journal = "Journal of Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-4545",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Primacy of warmth versus competence

T2 - A motivated bias?

AU - Richetin, Juliette

AU - Durante, Federica

AU - Mari, Silvia

AU - Perugini, Marco

AU - Volpato, Chiara

PY - 2012/7/1

Y1 - 2012/7/1

N2 - In line with previous results that challenge the traditional primacy of warmth over competence in outgroup perception, we propose to bridge elements from stereotype content model and social identity theory: Perceivers will use the competence and warmth dimensions differentially when interpreting higher or lower status outgroup members' behavior. We test the hypothesis that the dimension that is less favorable for the outgroup and more favorable for the ingroup will be used. In particular, we investigate whether the warmth dimension would better predict the interpretation of higher status outgroup members' behavior than the competence dimension, whereas the competence dimension would better predict the interpretation of lower status outgroup members' behavior than the warmth dimension. Two studies separately test these effects. Results suggest the existence of a motivated bias in interpreting outgroup members' behavior, especially when there is ingroup identification.

AB - In line with previous results that challenge the traditional primacy of warmth over competence in outgroup perception, we propose to bridge elements from stereotype content model and social identity theory: Perceivers will use the competence and warmth dimensions differentially when interpreting higher or lower status outgroup members' behavior. We test the hypothesis that the dimension that is less favorable for the outgroup and more favorable for the ingroup will be used. In particular, we investigate whether the warmth dimension would better predict the interpretation of higher status outgroup members' behavior than the competence dimension, whereas the competence dimension would better predict the interpretation of lower status outgroup members' behavior than the warmth dimension. Two studies separately test these effects. Results suggest the existence of a motivated bias in interpreting outgroup members' behavior, especially when there is ingroup identification.

KW - competence

KW - ingroup bias

KW - intergroup perception

KW - status

KW - warmth

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861831581&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84861831581&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00224545.2011.623735

DO - 10.1080/00224545.2011.623735

M3 - Article

C2 - 22822683

AN - SCOPUS:84861831581

VL - 152

SP - 417

EP - 435

JO - Journal of Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Social Psychology

SN - 0022-4545

IS - 4

ER -