Primary progressive aphasia: a review of neuropsychological tests for the assessment of speech and language disorders

Petronilla Battista, Antonio Miozzo, Marco Piccininni, Eleonora Catricalà, Rosa Capozzo, Rosanna Tortelli, Alessandro Padovani, Stefano F. Cappa, Giancarlo Logroscino

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Speech and language impairments are the key clinical feature in several neurodegenerative disorders and primary progressive aphasia (PPA) is the syndrome where they are the prominent features. Their accurate and early identification may increase the diagnosis in the clinical setting. This approach may allow a better discrimination between the different neurodegenerative disorders and the PPA variants, i.e., nonfluent, semantic, logopenic. Aims: The aim of this work is twofold: (1) to provide an overview of the available neuropsychological tests for the diagnosis of PPA and/or for the differentiation among the PPA variants and (2) to evaluate the methodological quality and the psychometric characteristics of these tests. Methods & Procedures: This review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Search terms were chosen based on the research questions and used in a search in two databases. Then, inclusion criteria were formulated and papers meeting the criteria were reviewed. The methodological quality of the studies was evaluated examining the following items: (1) blindness of personnel, (2) consecutive inclusion of patients, and (3) representativeness of the sample. Outcomes & Results: A total of 907 papers have been selected from the databases, and 9 of them were included in this review. Among these, three tests aimed to differentiate between PPA variants, two tests were designed for the assessment of language disorders in PPA patients, and four tests were developed to stage the severity of speech/language disorders in PPA patients. All the included studies provided psychometric data about the clinical validity of the tests; however, they present several limitations, both psychometric and methodological. Conclusion: The number of validation studies is still limited. This brief review reveals the need of linguistically sophisticated tests, characterized by better quality of methods and psychometric characteristics, to be used to systematically evaluate the linguistic abilities of individuals with PPA.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1359-1378
Number of pages20
JournalAphasiology
Volume31
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2 2017

Fingerprint

Primary Progressive Aphasia
Language Disorders
Speech Disorders
Neuropsychological Tests
speech disorder
language
Psychometrics
psychometrics
Neurodegenerative Diseases
inclusion
Databases
Aptitude
blindness
Validation Studies
Blindness
Linguistics
Semantics
personnel
Language
discrimination

Keywords

  • assessment
  • clinical validity
  • Neurodegenerative disorders
  • PPA
  • speech/language test

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • LPN and LVN

Cite this

Battista, P., Miozzo, A., Piccininni, M., Catricalà, E., Capozzo, R., Tortelli, R., ... Logroscino, G. (2017). Primary progressive aphasia: a review of neuropsychological tests for the assessment of speech and language disorders. Aphasiology, 31(12), 1359-1378. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2017.1378799

Primary progressive aphasia : a review of neuropsychological tests for the assessment of speech and language disorders. / Battista, Petronilla; Miozzo, Antonio; Piccininni, Marco; Catricalà, Eleonora; Capozzo, Rosa; Tortelli, Rosanna; Padovani, Alessandro; Cappa, Stefano F.; Logroscino, Giancarlo.

In: Aphasiology, Vol. 31, No. 12, 02.12.2017, p. 1359-1378.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Battista, P, Miozzo, A, Piccininni, M, Catricalà, E, Capozzo, R, Tortelli, R, Padovani, A, Cappa, SF & Logroscino, G 2017, 'Primary progressive aphasia: a review of neuropsychological tests for the assessment of speech and language disorders', Aphasiology, vol. 31, no. 12, pp. 1359-1378. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2017.1378799
Battista, Petronilla ; Miozzo, Antonio ; Piccininni, Marco ; Catricalà, Eleonora ; Capozzo, Rosa ; Tortelli, Rosanna ; Padovani, Alessandro ; Cappa, Stefano F. ; Logroscino, Giancarlo. / Primary progressive aphasia : a review of neuropsychological tests for the assessment of speech and language disorders. In: Aphasiology. 2017 ; Vol. 31, No. 12. pp. 1359-1378.
@article{23c9001f8c554b29817d57c676215b3f,
title = "Primary progressive aphasia: a review of neuropsychological tests for the assessment of speech and language disorders",
abstract = "Background: Speech and language impairments are the key clinical feature in several neurodegenerative disorders and primary progressive aphasia (PPA) is the syndrome where they are the prominent features. Their accurate and early identification may increase the diagnosis in the clinical setting. This approach may allow a better discrimination between the different neurodegenerative disorders and the PPA variants, i.e., nonfluent, semantic, logopenic. Aims: The aim of this work is twofold: (1) to provide an overview of the available neuropsychological tests for the diagnosis of PPA and/or for the differentiation among the PPA variants and (2) to evaluate the methodological quality and the psychometric characteristics of these tests. Methods & Procedures: This review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Search terms were chosen based on the research questions and used in a search in two databases. Then, inclusion criteria were formulated and papers meeting the criteria were reviewed. The methodological quality of the studies was evaluated examining the following items: (1) blindness of personnel, (2) consecutive inclusion of patients, and (3) representativeness of the sample. Outcomes & Results: A total of 907 papers have been selected from the databases, and 9 of them were included in this review. Among these, three tests aimed to differentiate between PPA variants, two tests were designed for the assessment of language disorders in PPA patients, and four tests were developed to stage the severity of speech/language disorders in PPA patients. All the included studies provided psychometric data about the clinical validity of the tests; however, they present several limitations, both psychometric and methodological. Conclusion: The number of validation studies is still limited. This brief review reveals the need of linguistically sophisticated tests, characterized by better quality of methods and psychometric characteristics, to be used to systematically evaluate the linguistic abilities of individuals with PPA.",
keywords = "assessment, clinical validity, Neurodegenerative disorders, PPA, speech/language test",
author = "Petronilla Battista and Antonio Miozzo and Marco Piccininni and Eleonora Catrical{\`a} and Rosa Capozzo and Rosanna Tortelli and Alessandro Padovani and Cappa, {Stefano F.} and Giancarlo Logroscino",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/02687038.2017.1378799",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "1359--1378",
journal = "Aphasiology",
issn = "0268-7038",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Primary progressive aphasia

T2 - a review of neuropsychological tests for the assessment of speech and language disorders

AU - Battista, Petronilla

AU - Miozzo, Antonio

AU - Piccininni, Marco

AU - Catricalà, Eleonora

AU - Capozzo, Rosa

AU - Tortelli, Rosanna

AU - Padovani, Alessandro

AU - Cappa, Stefano F.

AU - Logroscino, Giancarlo

PY - 2017/12/2

Y1 - 2017/12/2

N2 - Background: Speech and language impairments are the key clinical feature in several neurodegenerative disorders and primary progressive aphasia (PPA) is the syndrome where they are the prominent features. Their accurate and early identification may increase the diagnosis in the clinical setting. This approach may allow a better discrimination between the different neurodegenerative disorders and the PPA variants, i.e., nonfluent, semantic, logopenic. Aims: The aim of this work is twofold: (1) to provide an overview of the available neuropsychological tests for the diagnosis of PPA and/or for the differentiation among the PPA variants and (2) to evaluate the methodological quality and the psychometric characteristics of these tests. Methods & Procedures: This review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Search terms were chosen based on the research questions and used in a search in two databases. Then, inclusion criteria were formulated and papers meeting the criteria were reviewed. The methodological quality of the studies was evaluated examining the following items: (1) blindness of personnel, (2) consecutive inclusion of patients, and (3) representativeness of the sample. Outcomes & Results: A total of 907 papers have been selected from the databases, and 9 of them were included in this review. Among these, three tests aimed to differentiate between PPA variants, two tests were designed for the assessment of language disorders in PPA patients, and four tests were developed to stage the severity of speech/language disorders in PPA patients. All the included studies provided psychometric data about the clinical validity of the tests; however, they present several limitations, both psychometric and methodological. Conclusion: The number of validation studies is still limited. This brief review reveals the need of linguistically sophisticated tests, characterized by better quality of methods and psychometric characteristics, to be used to systematically evaluate the linguistic abilities of individuals with PPA.

AB - Background: Speech and language impairments are the key clinical feature in several neurodegenerative disorders and primary progressive aphasia (PPA) is the syndrome where they are the prominent features. Their accurate and early identification may increase the diagnosis in the clinical setting. This approach may allow a better discrimination between the different neurodegenerative disorders and the PPA variants, i.e., nonfluent, semantic, logopenic. Aims: The aim of this work is twofold: (1) to provide an overview of the available neuropsychological tests for the diagnosis of PPA and/or for the differentiation among the PPA variants and (2) to evaluate the methodological quality and the psychometric characteristics of these tests. Methods & Procedures: This review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Search terms were chosen based on the research questions and used in a search in two databases. Then, inclusion criteria were formulated and papers meeting the criteria were reviewed. The methodological quality of the studies was evaluated examining the following items: (1) blindness of personnel, (2) consecutive inclusion of patients, and (3) representativeness of the sample. Outcomes & Results: A total of 907 papers have been selected from the databases, and 9 of them were included in this review. Among these, three tests aimed to differentiate between PPA variants, two tests were designed for the assessment of language disorders in PPA patients, and four tests were developed to stage the severity of speech/language disorders in PPA patients. All the included studies provided psychometric data about the clinical validity of the tests; however, they present several limitations, both psychometric and methodological. Conclusion: The number of validation studies is still limited. This brief review reveals the need of linguistically sophisticated tests, characterized by better quality of methods and psychometric characteristics, to be used to systematically evaluate the linguistic abilities of individuals with PPA.

KW - assessment

KW - clinical validity

KW - Neurodegenerative disorders

KW - PPA

KW - speech/language test

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85030454697&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85030454697&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02687038.2017.1378799

DO - 10.1080/02687038.2017.1378799

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85030454697

VL - 31

SP - 1359

EP - 1378

JO - Aphasiology

JF - Aphasiology

SN - 0268-7038

IS - 12

ER -