TY - JOUR
T1 - Procedural costs of digital vs. analog archiving of diagnostic cardiac catheterizations
AU - Oetgen, Matthew E.
AU - New, Gishel
AU - Moussa, Issam
AU - Baiter, Stephen
AU - Collins, Michael
AU - Iyer, Sriram
AU - Roubin, Gary
AU - Colombo, Antonio
AU - Moses, Jeffrey W.
PY - 2000
Y1 - 2000
N2 - The use of digital technology in the cardiac catheterization laboratory is expanding at a rapid pace. The cost-effectiveness of this new technology is yet to be proven. The aims of this study were to determine the direct cost differences of digital versus analog media (CDs) for the storage of diagnostic cardiac catheterizations and to explore the factors influencing these differences. Procedural costs of all diagnostic angiograms (n = 109), from three physicians, performed in an analog catheterization laboratory (room A) and a digital catheterization laboratory (room C) were compared during a 9-month period. The mean procedural cost was higher in room A than in room C ($1,102 vs. $1,087, P <0.001). This cost difference was eliminated when recording media costs were excluded from analysis ($1,079 vs. $1,080, P = 0.931). Therefore, we conclude there is a procedural cost savings in a cardiac catheterization room that uses digital CDs versus cineangiogram film as the archival media. (C) 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
AB - The use of digital technology in the cardiac catheterization laboratory is expanding at a rapid pace. The cost-effectiveness of this new technology is yet to be proven. The aims of this study were to determine the direct cost differences of digital versus analog media (CDs) for the storage of diagnostic cardiac catheterizations and to explore the factors influencing these differences. Procedural costs of all diagnostic angiograms (n = 109), from three physicians, performed in an analog catheterization laboratory (room A) and a digital catheterization laboratory (room C) were compared during a 9-month period. The mean procedural cost was higher in room A than in room C ($1,102 vs. $1,087, P <0.001). This cost difference was eliminated when recording media costs were excluded from analysis ($1,079 vs. $1,080, P = 0.931). Therefore, we conclude there is a procedural cost savings in a cardiac catheterization room that uses digital CDs versus cineangiogram film as the archival media. (C) 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
KW - Coronary angiography
KW - Cost analysis
KW - Digital imaging
KW - Economics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034058816&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034058816&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/(SICI)1522-726X(200003)49:3<246::AID-CCD3>3.0.CO;2-3
DO - 10.1002/(SICI)1522-726X(200003)49:3<246::AID-CCD3>3.0.CO;2-3
M3 - Article
C2 - 10700050
AN - SCOPUS:0034058816
VL - 49
SP - 246
EP - 250
JO - Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
JF - Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
SN - 1522-1946
IS - 3
ER -