Procedural costs of digital vs. analog archiving of diagnostic cardiac catheterizations

Matthew E. Oetgen, Gishel New, Issam Moussa, Stephen Baiter, Michael Collins, Sriram Iyer, Gary Roubin, Antonio Colombo, Jeffrey W. Moses

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The use of digital technology in the cardiac catheterization laboratory is expanding at a rapid pace. The cost-effectiveness of this new technology is yet to be proven. The aims of this study were to determine the direct cost differences of digital versus analog media (CDs) for the storage of diagnostic cardiac catheterizations and to explore the factors influencing these differences. Procedural costs of all diagnostic angiograms (n = 109), from three physicians, performed in an analog catheterization laboratory (room A) and a digital catheterization laboratory (room C) were compared during a 9-month period. The mean procedural cost was higher in room A than in room C ($1,102 vs. $1,087, P <0.001). This cost difference was eliminated when recording media costs were excluded from analysis ($1,079 vs. $1,080, P = 0.931). Therefore, we conclude there is a procedural cost savings in a cardiac catheterization room that uses digital CDs versus cineangiogram film as the archival media. (C) 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)246-250
Number of pages5
JournalCatheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Volume49
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2000

Fingerprint

Cardiac Catheterization
Costs and Cost Analysis
Catheterization
Technology
Cost Savings
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Angiography
Physicians

Keywords

  • Coronary angiography
  • Cost analysis
  • Digital imaging
  • Economics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Procedural costs of digital vs. analog archiving of diagnostic cardiac catheterizations. / Oetgen, Matthew E.; New, Gishel; Moussa, Issam; Baiter, Stephen; Collins, Michael; Iyer, Sriram; Roubin, Gary; Colombo, Antonio; Moses, Jeffrey W.

In: Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, Vol. 49, No. 3, 2000, p. 246-250.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Oetgen, Matthew E. ; New, Gishel ; Moussa, Issam ; Baiter, Stephen ; Collins, Michael ; Iyer, Sriram ; Roubin, Gary ; Colombo, Antonio ; Moses, Jeffrey W. / Procedural costs of digital vs. analog archiving of diagnostic cardiac catheterizations. In: Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 2000 ; Vol. 49, No. 3. pp. 246-250.
@article{cbcadc3cedca42e6944b7c27bbfbcf35,
title = "Procedural costs of digital vs. analog archiving of diagnostic cardiac catheterizations",
abstract = "The use of digital technology in the cardiac catheterization laboratory is expanding at a rapid pace. The cost-effectiveness of this new technology is yet to be proven. The aims of this study were to determine the direct cost differences of digital versus analog media (CDs) for the storage of diagnostic cardiac catheterizations and to explore the factors influencing these differences. Procedural costs of all diagnostic angiograms (n = 109), from three physicians, performed in an analog catheterization laboratory (room A) and a digital catheterization laboratory (room C) were compared during a 9-month period. The mean procedural cost was higher in room A than in room C ($1,102 vs. $1,087, P <0.001). This cost difference was eliminated when recording media costs were excluded from analysis ($1,079 vs. $1,080, P = 0.931). Therefore, we conclude there is a procedural cost savings in a cardiac catheterization room that uses digital CDs versus cineangiogram film as the archival media. (C) 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.",
keywords = "Coronary angiography, Cost analysis, Digital imaging, Economics",
author = "Oetgen, {Matthew E.} and Gishel New and Issam Moussa and Stephen Baiter and Michael Collins and Sriram Iyer and Gary Roubin and Antonio Colombo and Moses, {Jeffrey W.}",
year = "2000",
doi = "10.1002/(SICI)1522-726X(200003)49:3<246::AID-CCD3>3.0.CO;2-3",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "246--250",
journal = "Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions",
issn = "1522-1946",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Procedural costs of digital vs. analog archiving of diagnostic cardiac catheterizations

AU - Oetgen, Matthew E.

AU - New, Gishel

AU - Moussa, Issam

AU - Baiter, Stephen

AU - Collins, Michael

AU - Iyer, Sriram

AU - Roubin, Gary

AU - Colombo, Antonio

AU - Moses, Jeffrey W.

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - The use of digital technology in the cardiac catheterization laboratory is expanding at a rapid pace. The cost-effectiveness of this new technology is yet to be proven. The aims of this study were to determine the direct cost differences of digital versus analog media (CDs) for the storage of diagnostic cardiac catheterizations and to explore the factors influencing these differences. Procedural costs of all diagnostic angiograms (n = 109), from three physicians, performed in an analog catheterization laboratory (room A) and a digital catheterization laboratory (room C) were compared during a 9-month period. The mean procedural cost was higher in room A than in room C ($1,102 vs. $1,087, P <0.001). This cost difference was eliminated when recording media costs were excluded from analysis ($1,079 vs. $1,080, P = 0.931). Therefore, we conclude there is a procedural cost savings in a cardiac catheterization room that uses digital CDs versus cineangiogram film as the archival media. (C) 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

AB - The use of digital technology in the cardiac catheterization laboratory is expanding at a rapid pace. The cost-effectiveness of this new technology is yet to be proven. The aims of this study were to determine the direct cost differences of digital versus analog media (CDs) for the storage of diagnostic cardiac catheterizations and to explore the factors influencing these differences. Procedural costs of all diagnostic angiograms (n = 109), from three physicians, performed in an analog catheterization laboratory (room A) and a digital catheterization laboratory (room C) were compared during a 9-month period. The mean procedural cost was higher in room A than in room C ($1,102 vs. $1,087, P <0.001). This cost difference was eliminated when recording media costs were excluded from analysis ($1,079 vs. $1,080, P = 0.931). Therefore, we conclude there is a procedural cost savings in a cardiac catheterization room that uses digital CDs versus cineangiogram film as the archival media. (C) 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

KW - Coronary angiography

KW - Cost analysis

KW - Digital imaging

KW - Economics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034058816&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034058816&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/(SICI)1522-726X(200003)49:3<246::AID-CCD3>3.0.CO;2-3

DO - 10.1002/(SICI)1522-726X(200003)49:3<246::AID-CCD3>3.0.CO;2-3

M3 - Article

C2 - 10700050

AN - SCOPUS:0034058816

VL - 49

SP - 246

EP - 250

JO - Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

JF - Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

SN - 1522-1946

IS - 3

ER -