Process and risk analysis to reduce errors in clinical laboratories

Chiara Signori, Ferruccio Ceriotti, Alberto Sanna, Mario Plebani, Gianni Messeri, Cosimo Ottomano, Francesca Di Serio, Pierangelo Bonini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: An important point in improving laboratory quality is the definition of some indicators to be monitored as measures of a laboratory trend. The continuous observation of these indicators can help to reduce errors and risk of errors, thus enhancing the laboratory outcome. In addition, the standardization of risk evaluation techniques and the definition of a set of indicators can eventually contribute to a benchmarking process in clinical laboratories. Methods: Five Italian hospital laboratories cooperated in a project in which methodologies for process and risk analysis, usually applied in fields other than healthcare (typically aeronautical and transport industries), were adapted and applied to laboratory medicine. The collaboration of a board of experts played a key role in underlining the limits of the proposed techniques and adapting them to the laboratory situation. A detailed process analysis performed in each center was the starting point, followed by risk analysis to evaluate risks and facilitate benchmarking among the participants. Results and conclusions: The techniques applied allowed the formulation of a list of non-conformities that represented risks of errors. The level of risk related to each was quantified and graphically represented for each laboratory to identify the risk area characteristic for each of the centers involved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)742-748
Number of pages7
JournalClinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
Volume45
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 1 2007

Fingerprint

Clinical laboratories
Risk analysis
Benchmarking
Hospital Laboratories
Standardization
Medicine
Industry
Observation
Delivery of Health Care

Keywords

  • Error and risk of error
  • Iatrogenic damage
  • Process analysis
  • Risk assessment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Biochemistry

Cite this

Process and risk analysis to reduce errors in clinical laboratories. / Signori, Chiara; Ceriotti, Ferruccio; Sanna, Alberto; Plebani, Mario; Messeri, Gianni; Ottomano, Cosimo; Di Serio, Francesca; Bonini, Pierangelo.

In: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Vol. 45, No. 6, 01.06.2007, p. 742-748.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Signori, C, Ceriotti, F, Sanna, A, Plebani, M, Messeri, G, Ottomano, C, Di Serio, F & Bonini, P 2007, 'Process and risk analysis to reduce errors in clinical laboratories', Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 742-748. https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2007.172
Signori, Chiara ; Ceriotti, Ferruccio ; Sanna, Alberto ; Plebani, Mario ; Messeri, Gianni ; Ottomano, Cosimo ; Di Serio, Francesca ; Bonini, Pierangelo. / Process and risk analysis to reduce errors in clinical laboratories. In: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. 2007 ; Vol. 45, No. 6. pp. 742-748.
@article{04ca2f9092484f9da62e6a7c478cd619,
title = "Process and risk analysis to reduce errors in clinical laboratories",
abstract = "Background: An important point in improving laboratory quality is the definition of some indicators to be monitored as measures of a laboratory trend. The continuous observation of these indicators can help to reduce errors and risk of errors, thus enhancing the laboratory outcome. In addition, the standardization of risk evaluation techniques and the definition of a set of indicators can eventually contribute to a benchmarking process in clinical laboratories. Methods: Five Italian hospital laboratories cooperated in a project in which methodologies for process and risk analysis, usually applied in fields other than healthcare (typically aeronautical and transport industries), were adapted and applied to laboratory medicine. The collaboration of a board of experts played a key role in underlining the limits of the proposed techniques and adapting them to the laboratory situation. A detailed process analysis performed in each center was the starting point, followed by risk analysis to evaluate risks and facilitate benchmarking among the participants. Results and conclusions: The techniques applied allowed the formulation of a list of non-conformities that represented risks of errors. The level of risk related to each was quantified and graphically represented for each laboratory to identify the risk area characteristic for each of the centers involved.",
keywords = "Error and risk of error, Iatrogenic damage, Process analysis, Risk assessment",
author = "Chiara Signori and Ferruccio Ceriotti and Alberto Sanna and Mario Plebani and Gianni Messeri and Cosimo Ottomano and {Di Serio}, Francesca and Pierangelo Bonini",
year = "2007",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1515/CCLM.2007.172",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "742--748",
journal = "Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine",
issn = "1434-6621",
publisher = "Walter de Gruyter GmbH",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Process and risk analysis to reduce errors in clinical laboratories

AU - Signori, Chiara

AU - Ceriotti, Ferruccio

AU - Sanna, Alberto

AU - Plebani, Mario

AU - Messeri, Gianni

AU - Ottomano, Cosimo

AU - Di Serio, Francesca

AU - Bonini, Pierangelo

PY - 2007/6/1

Y1 - 2007/6/1

N2 - Background: An important point in improving laboratory quality is the definition of some indicators to be monitored as measures of a laboratory trend. The continuous observation of these indicators can help to reduce errors and risk of errors, thus enhancing the laboratory outcome. In addition, the standardization of risk evaluation techniques and the definition of a set of indicators can eventually contribute to a benchmarking process in clinical laboratories. Methods: Five Italian hospital laboratories cooperated in a project in which methodologies for process and risk analysis, usually applied in fields other than healthcare (typically aeronautical and transport industries), were adapted and applied to laboratory medicine. The collaboration of a board of experts played a key role in underlining the limits of the proposed techniques and adapting them to the laboratory situation. A detailed process analysis performed in each center was the starting point, followed by risk analysis to evaluate risks and facilitate benchmarking among the participants. Results and conclusions: The techniques applied allowed the formulation of a list of non-conformities that represented risks of errors. The level of risk related to each was quantified and graphically represented for each laboratory to identify the risk area characteristic for each of the centers involved.

AB - Background: An important point in improving laboratory quality is the definition of some indicators to be monitored as measures of a laboratory trend. The continuous observation of these indicators can help to reduce errors and risk of errors, thus enhancing the laboratory outcome. In addition, the standardization of risk evaluation techniques and the definition of a set of indicators can eventually contribute to a benchmarking process in clinical laboratories. Methods: Five Italian hospital laboratories cooperated in a project in which methodologies for process and risk analysis, usually applied in fields other than healthcare (typically aeronautical and transport industries), were adapted and applied to laboratory medicine. The collaboration of a board of experts played a key role in underlining the limits of the proposed techniques and adapting them to the laboratory situation. A detailed process analysis performed in each center was the starting point, followed by risk analysis to evaluate risks and facilitate benchmarking among the participants. Results and conclusions: The techniques applied allowed the formulation of a list of non-conformities that represented risks of errors. The level of risk related to each was quantified and graphically represented for each laboratory to identify the risk area characteristic for each of the centers involved.

KW - Error and risk of error

KW - Iatrogenic damage

KW - Process analysis

KW - Risk assessment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34250790766&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34250790766&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1515/CCLM.2007.172

DO - 10.1515/CCLM.2007.172

M3 - Article

C2 - 17579526

AN - SCOPUS:34250790766

VL - 45

SP - 742

EP - 748

JO - Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine

JF - Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine

SN - 1434-6621

IS - 6

ER -