TY - JOUR
T1 - Prognostic effect of neuroendocrine differentiation in prostate cancer
T2 - A critical review
AU - Surcel, Cristian I.
AU - van Oort, Inge M.
AU - Sooriakumaran, Prasanna
AU - Briganti, Alberto
AU - De Visschere, Peter J L
AU - Fütterer, Jurgen J.
AU - Ghadjar, Pirus
AU - Isbarn, Hendrik
AU - Ost, Piet
AU - van den Bergh, Roderick C N
AU - Yossepowitch, Ofer
AU - Giannarini, Gianluca
AU - Ploussard, Guillaume
PY - 2015/6/1
Y1 - 2015/6/1
N2 - Background: The multiple pathways that are involved in neuroendocrine differentiation (NED) in prostate cancer (PCa) are poorly elucidated. Evidence suggests that several environmental triggers induce NED leading to the adaptation of PCa to its close environment to maintain cell proliferation. Nevertheless, there is conflicting evidence regarding the prognostic role of NED in PCa. Methods: In this review, we aimed to summarize all available data about NED and to assess the prognostic role of NED in disease progression and therapy resistance, and its role in routine clinical practice. This review was based on articles found through a PubMed literature search between 1993 and 2013. The study outcome measure was the effect of NED on oncologic outcomes at each PCa stage. Results: In total, 59 articles reporting on the effect of NED on oncologic outcomes have been selected. In clinical practice, immunostaining for NED markers could have interesting predictive value for assessing the oncologic outcomes in patients receiving androgen-deprivation therapy. Thus, patients with high NED burden may be candidates for more aggressive treatment strategies targeting NED pathways. Conversely, strong evidence is lacking concerning its potential independent prognostic value in hormone-naïve PCa. Conclusions: Current published data are not sufficient to recommend the use of NE markers in routine practice, particularly at early PCa stage.
AB - Background: The multiple pathways that are involved in neuroendocrine differentiation (NED) in prostate cancer (PCa) are poorly elucidated. Evidence suggests that several environmental triggers induce NED leading to the adaptation of PCa to its close environment to maintain cell proliferation. Nevertheless, there is conflicting evidence regarding the prognostic role of NED in PCa. Methods: In this review, we aimed to summarize all available data about NED and to assess the prognostic role of NED in disease progression and therapy resistance, and its role in routine clinical practice. This review was based on articles found through a PubMed literature search between 1993 and 2013. The study outcome measure was the effect of NED on oncologic outcomes at each PCa stage. Results: In total, 59 articles reporting on the effect of NED on oncologic outcomes have been selected. In clinical practice, immunostaining for NED markers could have interesting predictive value for assessing the oncologic outcomes in patients receiving androgen-deprivation therapy. Thus, patients with high NED burden may be candidates for more aggressive treatment strategies targeting NED pathways. Conversely, strong evidence is lacking concerning its potential independent prognostic value in hormone-naïve PCa. Conclusions: Current published data are not sufficient to recommend the use of NE markers in routine practice, particularly at early PCa stage.
KW - Immunostaining
KW - Neuroendocrine differentiation
KW - Pathology
KW - Prognosis
KW - Prostate cancer
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929886563&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84929886563&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.urolonc.2014.08.007
DO - 10.1016/j.urolonc.2014.08.007
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84929886563
VL - 33
SP - 265.e1-265.e7
JO - Urologic Oncology
JF - Urologic Oncology
SN - 1078-1439
IS - 6
ER -