Programmed ventricular stimulation in patients with active vs previous arrhythmic myocarditis

Giovanni Peretto, Simone Sala, Cristina Basso, Paolo Della Bella

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Introduction: No studies so far addressed the role of invasive programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) in myocarditis patient's arrhythmic risk stratification. Methods and Results: We present a single-center prospective study on 96 consecutive adult patients (44 ± 13 years, 70.1% males) with myocarditis and ventricular arrhythmias (VA) at index hospitalization. Depending on baseline endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) and cardiac magnetic resonance, patients were divided into two groups: active (A) vs nonactive (NA) myocarditis. All of the patients underwent PVS at index hospitalization. Medical treatment and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation were clinically-driven. Malignant VA episodes (MVA = ventricular tachycardias [VT], ventricular fibrillation [VF], appropriate ICD therapy) were evaluated at 54 ± 18 months follow-up (FU). Patients who underwent VT ablation or with myocarditis recurrence (n = 9) were excluded. Of 87 patients, 41 (47.2%) were in group A. PVS was positive in 32 cases (36.8%), 16 A vs 16 NA (P = NS), with no associations with VA type at presentation. Before discharge, 55 patients (63.2%) underwent ICD implant. In FU, MVA occurred in 27 patients (31.0%), 13 A vs 14 NA (P = NS), 18 PVS+ vs 9 PVS- (P <.001). The association between PVS result and FU MVA was maximal in group NA (high rule-out performance with negative predictive value = 90.0%, P <.001) and minimal in group A (low rule-in performance with PPV = 43.8%, P =.302). In the whole population, three independent factors for major VA were identified: major arrhythmic onset by sustained VT or VF (HR 2.8, 95% CI, 1.0-7.4, P =.042), presence of fibrosis at EMB (HR 5.8, 95% CI, 1.1-30.0, P =.038), and PVS positivity (HR 4.2, 95% CI, 1.7-10.7, P =.003). Conclusion: In myocarditis patients presenting with VA, PVS is associated with FU MVA in NA patients, but not in A ones. Overall, risk stratification of arrhythmic myocardits is still complex and multifactorial.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)692-701
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
Volume31
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 1 2020

Keywords

  • electrophysiological study
  • myocarditis
  • programmed ventricular stimulation
  • sudden cardiac death
  • ventricular arrhythmias

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Physiology (medical)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Programmed ventricular stimulation in patients with active vs previous arrhythmic myocarditis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this