Propensity score analysis of outcomes following laparoscopic or open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma

C. Sposito, C. Battiston, A. Facciorusso, M. Mazzola, C. Muscarà, M. Scotti, R. Romito, L. Mariani, V. Mazzaferro

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

58 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Liver resection is a potentially curative approach for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Laparoscopic liver resections may reduce complication rates, especially in patients with cirrhosis. The aim of this study was to compare the results of laparoscopic liver resection with those of open liver resection for HCC. Methods: Patients with cirrhosis who underwent minor liver resections for HCC from 2006 to 2013 were identified retrospectively from a prospective database according to the technique adopted (laparoscopic or open). Short- and long-term outcomes were compared between the two groups before and after 1:1 propensity score matching. Results: A total of 269 patients were considered: 226 who underwent open liver resection and 43 who had a laparoscopic procedure. The two groups differed at baseline in terms of median age, sex, performance status, tumour location and type of resection. After propensity score matching, two comparable groups of 43 patients each were obtained. Intraoperative bleeding, margin clearance and operative mortality were similar in the two groups, whereas complication rates were lower (49 versus 19 per cent in open versus laparoscopic groups respectively; P=0·004) and median hospital stay was shorter (8 versus 5 days; P

Original languageEnglish
JournalBritish Journal of Surgery
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2016

Fingerprint

Propensity Score
Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Liver
Fibrosis
Length of Stay
Databases
Hemorrhage
Mortality
Neoplasms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Propensity score analysis of outcomes following laparoscopic or open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. / Sposito, C.; Battiston, C.; Facciorusso, A.; Mazzola, M.; Muscarà, C.; Scotti, M.; Romito, R.; Mariani, L.; Mazzaferro, V.

In: British Journal of Surgery, 2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0f48679d83a74338ac341a5a3988e776,
title = "Propensity score analysis of outcomes following laparoscopic or open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma",
abstract = "Background: Liver resection is a potentially curative approach for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Laparoscopic liver resections may reduce complication rates, especially in patients with cirrhosis. The aim of this study was to compare the results of laparoscopic liver resection with those of open liver resection for HCC. Methods: Patients with cirrhosis who underwent minor liver resections for HCC from 2006 to 2013 were identified retrospectively from a prospective database according to the technique adopted (laparoscopic or open). Short- and long-term outcomes were compared between the two groups before and after 1:1 propensity score matching. Results: A total of 269 patients were considered: 226 who underwent open liver resection and 43 who had a laparoscopic procedure. The two groups differed at baseline in terms of median age, sex, performance status, tumour location and type of resection. After propensity score matching, two comparable groups of 43 patients each were obtained. Intraoperative bleeding, margin clearance and operative mortality were similar in the two groups, whereas complication rates were lower (49 versus 19 per cent in open versus laparoscopic groups respectively; P=0·004) and median hospital stay was shorter (8 versus 5 days; P",
author = "C. Sposito and C. Battiston and A. Facciorusso and M. Mazzola and C. Muscar{\`a} and M. Scotti and R. Romito and L. Mariani and V. Mazzaferro",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1002/bjs.10137",
language = "English",
journal = "British Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0007-1323",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Propensity score analysis of outcomes following laparoscopic or open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma

AU - Sposito, C.

AU - Battiston, C.

AU - Facciorusso, A.

AU - Mazzola, M.

AU - Muscarà, C.

AU - Scotti, M.

AU - Romito, R.

AU - Mariani, L.

AU - Mazzaferro, V.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Background: Liver resection is a potentially curative approach for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Laparoscopic liver resections may reduce complication rates, especially in patients with cirrhosis. The aim of this study was to compare the results of laparoscopic liver resection with those of open liver resection for HCC. Methods: Patients with cirrhosis who underwent minor liver resections for HCC from 2006 to 2013 were identified retrospectively from a prospective database according to the technique adopted (laparoscopic or open). Short- and long-term outcomes were compared between the two groups before and after 1:1 propensity score matching. Results: A total of 269 patients were considered: 226 who underwent open liver resection and 43 who had a laparoscopic procedure. The two groups differed at baseline in terms of median age, sex, performance status, tumour location and type of resection. After propensity score matching, two comparable groups of 43 patients each were obtained. Intraoperative bleeding, margin clearance and operative mortality were similar in the two groups, whereas complication rates were lower (49 versus 19 per cent in open versus laparoscopic groups respectively; P=0·004) and median hospital stay was shorter (8 versus 5 days; P

AB - Background: Liver resection is a potentially curative approach for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Laparoscopic liver resections may reduce complication rates, especially in patients with cirrhosis. The aim of this study was to compare the results of laparoscopic liver resection with those of open liver resection for HCC. Methods: Patients with cirrhosis who underwent minor liver resections for HCC from 2006 to 2013 were identified retrospectively from a prospective database according to the technique adopted (laparoscopic or open). Short- and long-term outcomes were compared between the two groups before and after 1:1 propensity score matching. Results: A total of 269 patients were considered: 226 who underwent open liver resection and 43 who had a laparoscopic procedure. The two groups differed at baseline in terms of median age, sex, performance status, tumour location and type of resection. After propensity score matching, two comparable groups of 43 patients each were obtained. Intraoperative bleeding, margin clearance and operative mortality were similar in the two groups, whereas complication rates were lower (49 versus 19 per cent in open versus laparoscopic groups respectively; P=0·004) and median hospital stay was shorter (8 versus 5 days; P

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962593999&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84962593999&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/bjs.10137

DO - 10.1002/bjs.10137

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84962593999

JO - British Journal of Surgery

JF - British Journal of Surgery

SN - 0007-1323

ER -