Studio prospettico del successo e dell'efficacia della neurostimolazione midollare

Translated title of the contribution: Prospective study of the success and efficacy of spinal cord stimulation

M. Allegri, G. Arachi, M. Barbieri, L. Paulin, R. Bettaglio, G. Bonetti, L. Demartini, A. Violini, A. Braschi, C. Bonezzi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim. To explore success, the percentage of patients who received definitive implants compared to all patients screened, and efficacy, the percentage of patients that had improved in at least 3 of the 5 parameters after 1 year. In addition, we determined if there was a statistically significant reduction in pain and functional limiting. Finally, we wanted to investigate if the different paresthesia coverage has a different outcome after 1 year of SCS treatment. Methods. We studied 170 patients with neuropathic pain syndrome, failed back surgery syndrome and vascular disease, who received spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in the last 4 years. We evaluated, at the beginning and after 1 year, the patients with a questionnaire that assessed pain, what kind of function, drug consumption, patient's satisfaction and the improvement in the quality of life. Results. This study showed a success of more than 50% and an efficacy of more than 69.9%, with no significant differences in 3 different chronic pain conditions. Pain and functional limiting presented a statistically significant reduction. Finally, we confirmed that there were no statistically significant differences between patients with different paresthesia coverage. Conclusion. This prospective study confirmed that SCS had good success and efficacy in the treatment of several types of chronic pain. Finally, our study showed the importance of obtaining paresthesia in the affected area but it is not essential to cover the entire painful area.

Original languageItalian
Pages (from-to)117-124
Number of pages8
JournalMinerva Anestesiologica
Volume70
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2004

Fingerprint

Spinal Cord Stimulation
Prospective Studies
Paresthesia
Pain
Chronic Pain
Failed Back Surgery Syndrome
Neuralgia
Patient Satisfaction
Vascular Diseases
Quality of Life
Pharmaceutical Preparations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Allegri, M., Arachi, G., Barbieri, M., Paulin, L., Bettaglio, R., Bonetti, G., ... Bonezzi, C. (2004). Studio prospettico del successo e dell'efficacia della neurostimolazione midollare. Minerva Anestesiologica, 70(3), 117-124.

Studio prospettico del successo e dell'efficacia della neurostimolazione midollare. / Allegri, M.; Arachi, G.; Barbieri, M.; Paulin, L.; Bettaglio, R.; Bonetti, G.; Demartini, L.; Violini, A.; Braschi, A.; Bonezzi, C.

In: Minerva Anestesiologica, Vol. 70, No. 3, 03.2004, p. 117-124.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Allegri, M, Arachi, G, Barbieri, M, Paulin, L, Bettaglio, R, Bonetti, G, Demartini, L, Violini, A, Braschi, A & Bonezzi, C 2004, 'Studio prospettico del successo e dell'efficacia della neurostimolazione midollare', Minerva Anestesiologica, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 117-124.
Allegri M, Arachi G, Barbieri M, Paulin L, Bettaglio R, Bonetti G et al. Studio prospettico del successo e dell'efficacia della neurostimolazione midollare. Minerva Anestesiologica. 2004 Mar;70(3):117-124.
Allegri, M. ; Arachi, G. ; Barbieri, M. ; Paulin, L. ; Bettaglio, R. ; Bonetti, G. ; Demartini, L. ; Violini, A. ; Braschi, A. ; Bonezzi, C. / Studio prospettico del successo e dell'efficacia della neurostimolazione midollare. In: Minerva Anestesiologica. 2004 ; Vol. 70, No. 3. pp. 117-124.
@article{f036ff4699b44957b87f8477fa4d1fc9,
title = "Studio prospettico del successo e dell'efficacia della neurostimolazione midollare",
abstract = "Aim. To explore success, the percentage of patients who received definitive implants compared to all patients screened, and efficacy, the percentage of patients that had improved in at least 3 of the 5 parameters after 1 year. In addition, we determined if there was a statistically significant reduction in pain and functional limiting. Finally, we wanted to investigate if the different paresthesia coverage has a different outcome after 1 year of SCS treatment. Methods. We studied 170 patients with neuropathic pain syndrome, failed back surgery syndrome and vascular disease, who received spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in the last 4 years. We evaluated, at the beginning and after 1 year, the patients with a questionnaire that assessed pain, what kind of function, drug consumption, patient's satisfaction and the improvement in the quality of life. Results. This study showed a success of more than 50{\%} and an efficacy of more than 69.9{\%}, with no significant differences in 3 different chronic pain conditions. Pain and functional limiting presented a statistically significant reduction. Finally, we confirmed that there were no statistically significant differences between patients with different paresthesia coverage. Conclusion. This prospective study confirmed that SCS had good success and efficacy in the treatment of several types of chronic pain. Finally, our study showed the importance of obtaining paresthesia in the affected area but it is not essential to cover the entire painful area.",
keywords = "Electric stimulation therapy, Pain, prevention and control, Spinal cord",
author = "M. Allegri and G. Arachi and M. Barbieri and L. Paulin and R. Bettaglio and G. Bonetti and L. Demartini and A. Violini and A. Braschi and C. Bonezzi",
year = "2004",
month = "3",
language = "Italian",
volume = "70",
pages = "117--124",
journal = "Minerva Anestesiologica",
issn = "0375-9393",
publisher = "Edizioni Minerva Medica S.p.A.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Studio prospettico del successo e dell'efficacia della neurostimolazione midollare

AU - Allegri, M.

AU - Arachi, G.

AU - Barbieri, M.

AU - Paulin, L.

AU - Bettaglio, R.

AU - Bonetti, G.

AU - Demartini, L.

AU - Violini, A.

AU - Braschi, A.

AU - Bonezzi, C.

PY - 2004/3

Y1 - 2004/3

N2 - Aim. To explore success, the percentage of patients who received definitive implants compared to all patients screened, and efficacy, the percentage of patients that had improved in at least 3 of the 5 parameters after 1 year. In addition, we determined if there was a statistically significant reduction in pain and functional limiting. Finally, we wanted to investigate if the different paresthesia coverage has a different outcome after 1 year of SCS treatment. Methods. We studied 170 patients with neuropathic pain syndrome, failed back surgery syndrome and vascular disease, who received spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in the last 4 years. We evaluated, at the beginning and after 1 year, the patients with a questionnaire that assessed pain, what kind of function, drug consumption, patient's satisfaction and the improvement in the quality of life. Results. This study showed a success of more than 50% and an efficacy of more than 69.9%, with no significant differences in 3 different chronic pain conditions. Pain and functional limiting presented a statistically significant reduction. Finally, we confirmed that there were no statistically significant differences between patients with different paresthesia coverage. Conclusion. This prospective study confirmed that SCS had good success and efficacy in the treatment of several types of chronic pain. Finally, our study showed the importance of obtaining paresthesia in the affected area but it is not essential to cover the entire painful area.

AB - Aim. To explore success, the percentage of patients who received definitive implants compared to all patients screened, and efficacy, the percentage of patients that had improved in at least 3 of the 5 parameters after 1 year. In addition, we determined if there was a statistically significant reduction in pain and functional limiting. Finally, we wanted to investigate if the different paresthesia coverage has a different outcome after 1 year of SCS treatment. Methods. We studied 170 patients with neuropathic pain syndrome, failed back surgery syndrome and vascular disease, who received spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in the last 4 years. We evaluated, at the beginning and after 1 year, the patients with a questionnaire that assessed pain, what kind of function, drug consumption, patient's satisfaction and the improvement in the quality of life. Results. This study showed a success of more than 50% and an efficacy of more than 69.9%, with no significant differences in 3 different chronic pain conditions. Pain and functional limiting presented a statistically significant reduction. Finally, we confirmed that there were no statistically significant differences between patients with different paresthesia coverage. Conclusion. This prospective study confirmed that SCS had good success and efficacy in the treatment of several types of chronic pain. Finally, our study showed the importance of obtaining paresthesia in the affected area but it is not essential to cover the entire painful area.

KW - Electric stimulation therapy

KW - Pain, prevention and control

KW - Spinal cord

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=3142728655&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=3142728655&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Articolo

C2 - 14997084

AN - SCOPUS:3142728655

VL - 70

SP - 117

EP - 124

JO - Minerva Anestesiologica

JF - Minerva Anestesiologica

SN - 0375-9393

IS - 3

ER -