Prosthetic repair, intestinal resection, and potentially contaminated areas: Safe and feasible?

Giampiero Campanelli, F. M. Nicolosi, D. Pettinari, E. Contessini Avesani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction: Prosthetic repair for abdominal wall hernia currently represents the gold standard. However, it is still difficult to identify the correct indication for prosthetic implant in borderline cases. The authors propose evaluating whether a prosthetic implant is absolutely contraindicated in potentially infected operating fields through the review of literature and personal experience. Materials and methods: The authors performed ten prosthetic hernia repairs in potentially contaminated areas, with a preliminary preparation of the retromuscular-preperitoneal space hosting the prosthesis implant, and subsequent performance of the major operation. Results: There were neither major nor minor complications with a 21-month follow-up (mean period). Discussion: It is certain that both in noncomplicated inguinal hernia and in abdominal wall hernia repairs, the use of antibiotics can significantly reduce the number of infections. It is very important to underline that the success of the described procedure can be guaranteed only by an accurate preparation of the preperitoneal space: perfect haemostasis, temporary closure of the space with the insertion of iodine gauzes and suturing the edges, local antibiotic treatment, washing of the cavity, and accurate drainage. Conclusions: Prosthetic repair is the gold standard for inguinal, incisional, and all abdominal wall hernias and should be used, with the method described, even in potentially contaminated areas. The use of prosthesis has to be avoided in clearly infected cases.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)190-192
Number of pages3
JournalHernia
Volume8
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2004

Fingerprint

Abdominal Hernia
Abdominal Wall
Herniorrhaphy
Prostheses and Implants
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Groin
Inguinal Hernia
Hemostasis
Iodine
Drainage
Infection
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Contaminated fields
  • Correct implantation
  • Intestinal resection
  • Mesh
  • Prosthetic repair

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Campanelli, G., Nicolosi, F. M., Pettinari, D., & Avesani, E. C. (2004). Prosthetic repair, intestinal resection, and potentially contaminated areas: Safe and feasible? Hernia, 8(3), 190-192.

Prosthetic repair, intestinal resection, and potentially contaminated areas : Safe and feasible? / Campanelli, Giampiero; Nicolosi, F. M.; Pettinari, D.; Avesani, E. Contessini.

In: Hernia, Vol. 8, No. 3, 08.2004, p. 190-192.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Campanelli, G, Nicolosi, FM, Pettinari, D & Avesani, EC 2004, 'Prosthetic repair, intestinal resection, and potentially contaminated areas: Safe and feasible?', Hernia, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 190-192.
Campanelli G, Nicolosi FM, Pettinari D, Avesani EC. Prosthetic repair, intestinal resection, and potentially contaminated areas: Safe and feasible? Hernia. 2004 Aug;8(3):190-192.
Campanelli, Giampiero ; Nicolosi, F. M. ; Pettinari, D. ; Avesani, E. Contessini. / Prosthetic repair, intestinal resection, and potentially contaminated areas : Safe and feasible?. In: Hernia. 2004 ; Vol. 8, No. 3. pp. 190-192.
@article{41258b248e1d45e28b5ba8d7412a6874,
title = "Prosthetic repair, intestinal resection, and potentially contaminated areas: Safe and feasible?",
abstract = "Introduction: Prosthetic repair for abdominal wall hernia currently represents the gold standard. However, it is still difficult to identify the correct indication for prosthetic implant in borderline cases. The authors propose evaluating whether a prosthetic implant is absolutely contraindicated in potentially infected operating fields through the review of literature and personal experience. Materials and methods: The authors performed ten prosthetic hernia repairs in potentially contaminated areas, with a preliminary preparation of the retromuscular-preperitoneal space hosting the prosthesis implant, and subsequent performance of the major operation. Results: There were neither major nor minor complications with a 21-month follow-up (mean period). Discussion: It is certain that both in noncomplicated inguinal hernia and in abdominal wall hernia repairs, the use of antibiotics can significantly reduce the number of infections. It is very important to underline that the success of the described procedure can be guaranteed only by an accurate preparation of the preperitoneal space: perfect haemostasis, temporary closure of the space with the insertion of iodine gauzes and suturing the edges, local antibiotic treatment, washing of the cavity, and accurate drainage. Conclusions: Prosthetic repair is the gold standard for inguinal, incisional, and all abdominal wall hernias and should be used, with the method described, even in potentially contaminated areas. The use of prosthesis has to be avoided in clearly infected cases.",
keywords = "Contaminated fields, Correct implantation, Intestinal resection, Mesh, Prosthetic repair",
author = "Giampiero Campanelli and Nicolosi, {F. M.} and D. Pettinari and Avesani, {E. Contessini}",
year = "2004",
month = "8",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "190--192",
journal = "Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery",
issn = "1265-4906",
publisher = "Springer Paris",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prosthetic repair, intestinal resection, and potentially contaminated areas

T2 - Safe and feasible?

AU - Campanelli, Giampiero

AU - Nicolosi, F. M.

AU - Pettinari, D.

AU - Avesani, E. Contessini

PY - 2004/8

Y1 - 2004/8

N2 - Introduction: Prosthetic repair for abdominal wall hernia currently represents the gold standard. However, it is still difficult to identify the correct indication for prosthetic implant in borderline cases. The authors propose evaluating whether a prosthetic implant is absolutely contraindicated in potentially infected operating fields through the review of literature and personal experience. Materials and methods: The authors performed ten prosthetic hernia repairs in potentially contaminated areas, with a preliminary preparation of the retromuscular-preperitoneal space hosting the prosthesis implant, and subsequent performance of the major operation. Results: There were neither major nor minor complications with a 21-month follow-up (mean period). Discussion: It is certain that both in noncomplicated inguinal hernia and in abdominal wall hernia repairs, the use of antibiotics can significantly reduce the number of infections. It is very important to underline that the success of the described procedure can be guaranteed only by an accurate preparation of the preperitoneal space: perfect haemostasis, temporary closure of the space with the insertion of iodine gauzes and suturing the edges, local antibiotic treatment, washing of the cavity, and accurate drainage. Conclusions: Prosthetic repair is the gold standard for inguinal, incisional, and all abdominal wall hernias and should be used, with the method described, even in potentially contaminated areas. The use of prosthesis has to be avoided in clearly infected cases.

AB - Introduction: Prosthetic repair for abdominal wall hernia currently represents the gold standard. However, it is still difficult to identify the correct indication for prosthetic implant in borderline cases. The authors propose evaluating whether a prosthetic implant is absolutely contraindicated in potentially infected operating fields through the review of literature and personal experience. Materials and methods: The authors performed ten prosthetic hernia repairs in potentially contaminated areas, with a preliminary preparation of the retromuscular-preperitoneal space hosting the prosthesis implant, and subsequent performance of the major operation. Results: There were neither major nor minor complications with a 21-month follow-up (mean period). Discussion: It is certain that both in noncomplicated inguinal hernia and in abdominal wall hernia repairs, the use of antibiotics can significantly reduce the number of infections. It is very important to underline that the success of the described procedure can be guaranteed only by an accurate preparation of the preperitoneal space: perfect haemostasis, temporary closure of the space with the insertion of iodine gauzes and suturing the edges, local antibiotic treatment, washing of the cavity, and accurate drainage. Conclusions: Prosthetic repair is the gold standard for inguinal, incisional, and all abdominal wall hernias and should be used, with the method described, even in potentially contaminated areas. The use of prosthesis has to be avoided in clearly infected cases.

KW - Contaminated fields

KW - Correct implantation

KW - Intestinal resection

KW - Mesh

KW - Prosthetic repair

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4444362777&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4444362777&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 15205995

AN - SCOPUS:4444362777

VL - 8

SP - 190

EP - 192

JO - Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery

JF - Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery

SN - 1265-4906

IS - 3

ER -