Proteomic analysis reveals a major role for contact inhibition in the terminal differentiation of hepatocytes

Carmine Mancone, Beatrice Conti, Laura Amicone, Veronica Bordoni, Carla Cicchini, Ludovica Calvo, Ariel Basulto Perdomo, Gian Maria Fimia, Marco Tripodi, Tonino Alonzi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background & Aims: Hepatocytes are considered an exception of the paradigmatic inverse correlation between cell proliferation and terminal differentiation. In fact, hepatic vital functions are guaranteed by proliferating parenchymal cells during liver regeneration. However, a fine molecular characterization of the relationship between proliferation and differentiation in hepatocytes has been hampered by the lack of reliable in vivo or in vitro models. Methods: The hepatocyte terminal differentiation program was characterized in the immortalized, untransformed and differentiated hepatocytic cell line MMH, using several techniques. Particularly, two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis combined to tandem mass spectrometry proteomic approach was used. Cell cycle and cell adhesion properties of MMH have been altered using either myc-overexpression and MEK1/2 inhibition or a constitutive active β-catenin mutant, respectively. Results: The hepatocyte terminal differentiation program is stimulated by the exit from the cell cycle induced by cell-cell contact. Comparative proteomic analysis of proliferating versus quiescent hepatocytes validated the importance of contact inhibition, identifying 68 differently expressed gene products, representing 49 unique proteins. Notably, enzymes involved in important liver functions such as detoxification processes, lipid metabolism, iron and vitamin A storage and secretion, anti-inflammatory response and exocytosis were found significantly up-regulated in quiescent hepatocytes. Finally, we found that: (i) cell cycle arrest induced by MEK1/2 inhibition is not sufficient to induce hepatic product expression; (ii) constitutive activation of β-catenin counteracts the contact inhibition-induced terminal differentiation. Conclusion: The hepatocyte terminal differentiation program requires a quiescent state maintained by cell-cell contact through the E-cadherin/β-catenin pathway, rather than the inhibition of proliferation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)234-243
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Hepatology
Volume52
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2010

Fingerprint

Contact Inhibition
Proteomics
Hepatocytes
Catenins
Liver
Cell Cycle
Two-Dimensional Difference Gel Electrophoresis
Liver Regeneration
Exocytosis
Cadherins
Tandem Mass Spectrometry
Cell Cycle Checkpoints
Vitamin A
Lipid Metabolism
Cell Adhesion
Anti-Inflammatory Agents
Iron
Cell Proliferation
Cell Line
Enzymes

Keywords

  • β-Catenin
  • Cell-cell contact
  • Differentiation
  • MMH
  • Proteomics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hepatology

Cite this

Proteomic analysis reveals a major role for contact inhibition in the terminal differentiation of hepatocytes. / Mancone, Carmine; Conti, Beatrice; Amicone, Laura; Bordoni, Veronica; Cicchini, Carla; Calvo, Ludovica; Perdomo, Ariel Basulto; Fimia, Gian Maria; Tripodi, Marco; Alonzi, Tonino.

In: Journal of Hepatology, Vol. 52, No. 2, 02.2010, p. 234-243.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mancone, Carmine ; Conti, Beatrice ; Amicone, Laura ; Bordoni, Veronica ; Cicchini, Carla ; Calvo, Ludovica ; Perdomo, Ariel Basulto ; Fimia, Gian Maria ; Tripodi, Marco ; Alonzi, Tonino. / Proteomic analysis reveals a major role for contact inhibition in the terminal differentiation of hepatocytes. In: Journal of Hepatology. 2010 ; Vol. 52, No. 2. pp. 234-243.
@article{0268824a0b324005b916efd8e29144a6,
title = "Proteomic analysis reveals a major role for contact inhibition in the terminal differentiation of hepatocytes",
abstract = "Background & Aims: Hepatocytes are considered an exception of the paradigmatic inverse correlation between cell proliferation and terminal differentiation. In fact, hepatic vital functions are guaranteed by proliferating parenchymal cells during liver regeneration. However, a fine molecular characterization of the relationship between proliferation and differentiation in hepatocytes has been hampered by the lack of reliable in vivo or in vitro models. Methods: The hepatocyte terminal differentiation program was characterized in the immortalized, untransformed and differentiated hepatocytic cell line MMH, using several techniques. Particularly, two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis combined to tandem mass spectrometry proteomic approach was used. Cell cycle and cell adhesion properties of MMH have been altered using either myc-overexpression and MEK1/2 inhibition or a constitutive active β-catenin mutant, respectively. Results: The hepatocyte terminal differentiation program is stimulated by the exit from the cell cycle induced by cell-cell contact. Comparative proteomic analysis of proliferating versus quiescent hepatocytes validated the importance of contact inhibition, identifying 68 differently expressed gene products, representing 49 unique proteins. Notably, enzymes involved in important liver functions such as detoxification processes, lipid metabolism, iron and vitamin A storage and secretion, anti-inflammatory response and exocytosis were found significantly up-regulated in quiescent hepatocytes. Finally, we found that: (i) cell cycle arrest induced by MEK1/2 inhibition is not sufficient to induce hepatic product expression; (ii) constitutive activation of β-catenin counteracts the contact inhibition-induced terminal differentiation. Conclusion: The hepatocyte terminal differentiation program requires a quiescent state maintained by cell-cell contact through the E-cadherin/β-catenin pathway, rather than the inhibition of proliferation.",
keywords = "β-Catenin, Cell-cell contact, Differentiation, MMH, Proteomics",
author = "Carmine Mancone and Beatrice Conti and Laura Amicone and Veronica Bordoni and Carla Cicchini and Ludovica Calvo and Perdomo, {Ariel Basulto} and Fimia, {Gian Maria} and Marco Tripodi and Tonino Alonzi",
year = "2010",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.jhep.2009.11.013",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
pages = "234--243",
journal = "Journal of Hepatology",
issn = "0168-8278",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Proteomic analysis reveals a major role for contact inhibition in the terminal differentiation of hepatocytes

AU - Mancone, Carmine

AU - Conti, Beatrice

AU - Amicone, Laura

AU - Bordoni, Veronica

AU - Cicchini, Carla

AU - Calvo, Ludovica

AU - Perdomo, Ariel Basulto

AU - Fimia, Gian Maria

AU - Tripodi, Marco

AU - Alonzi, Tonino

PY - 2010/2

Y1 - 2010/2

N2 - Background & Aims: Hepatocytes are considered an exception of the paradigmatic inverse correlation between cell proliferation and terminal differentiation. In fact, hepatic vital functions are guaranteed by proliferating parenchymal cells during liver regeneration. However, a fine molecular characterization of the relationship between proliferation and differentiation in hepatocytes has been hampered by the lack of reliable in vivo or in vitro models. Methods: The hepatocyte terminal differentiation program was characterized in the immortalized, untransformed and differentiated hepatocytic cell line MMH, using several techniques. Particularly, two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis combined to tandem mass spectrometry proteomic approach was used. Cell cycle and cell adhesion properties of MMH have been altered using either myc-overexpression and MEK1/2 inhibition or a constitutive active β-catenin mutant, respectively. Results: The hepatocyte terminal differentiation program is stimulated by the exit from the cell cycle induced by cell-cell contact. Comparative proteomic analysis of proliferating versus quiescent hepatocytes validated the importance of contact inhibition, identifying 68 differently expressed gene products, representing 49 unique proteins. Notably, enzymes involved in important liver functions such as detoxification processes, lipid metabolism, iron and vitamin A storage and secretion, anti-inflammatory response and exocytosis were found significantly up-regulated in quiescent hepatocytes. Finally, we found that: (i) cell cycle arrest induced by MEK1/2 inhibition is not sufficient to induce hepatic product expression; (ii) constitutive activation of β-catenin counteracts the contact inhibition-induced terminal differentiation. Conclusion: The hepatocyte terminal differentiation program requires a quiescent state maintained by cell-cell contact through the E-cadherin/β-catenin pathway, rather than the inhibition of proliferation.

AB - Background & Aims: Hepatocytes are considered an exception of the paradigmatic inverse correlation between cell proliferation and terminal differentiation. In fact, hepatic vital functions are guaranteed by proliferating parenchymal cells during liver regeneration. However, a fine molecular characterization of the relationship between proliferation and differentiation in hepatocytes has been hampered by the lack of reliable in vivo or in vitro models. Methods: The hepatocyte terminal differentiation program was characterized in the immortalized, untransformed and differentiated hepatocytic cell line MMH, using several techniques. Particularly, two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis combined to tandem mass spectrometry proteomic approach was used. Cell cycle and cell adhesion properties of MMH have been altered using either myc-overexpression and MEK1/2 inhibition or a constitutive active β-catenin mutant, respectively. Results: The hepatocyte terminal differentiation program is stimulated by the exit from the cell cycle induced by cell-cell contact. Comparative proteomic analysis of proliferating versus quiescent hepatocytes validated the importance of contact inhibition, identifying 68 differently expressed gene products, representing 49 unique proteins. Notably, enzymes involved in important liver functions such as detoxification processes, lipid metabolism, iron and vitamin A storage and secretion, anti-inflammatory response and exocytosis were found significantly up-regulated in quiescent hepatocytes. Finally, we found that: (i) cell cycle arrest induced by MEK1/2 inhibition is not sufficient to induce hepatic product expression; (ii) constitutive activation of β-catenin counteracts the contact inhibition-induced terminal differentiation. Conclusion: The hepatocyte terminal differentiation program requires a quiescent state maintained by cell-cell contact through the E-cadherin/β-catenin pathway, rather than the inhibition of proliferation.

KW - β-Catenin

KW - Cell-cell contact

KW - Differentiation

KW - MMH

KW - Proteomics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=75349083403&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=75349083403&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jhep.2009.11.013

DO - 10.1016/j.jhep.2009.11.013

M3 - Article

C2 - 20031246

AN - SCOPUS:75349083403

VL - 52

SP - 234

EP - 243

JO - Journal of Hepatology

JF - Journal of Hepatology

SN - 0168-8278

IS - 2

ER -