Psychometric validation of the Italian Rehabilitation Complexity Scale-Extended version 13

Francesca Roda, Maurizio Agosti, Andrea Merlo, Maurizio Maini, Francesco Lombardi, Claudio Tedeschi, Maria Grazia Benedetti, Nino Basaglia, Mara Contini, Domenico Nicolotti, Rodolfo Brianti, GRECo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In Italy, at present, a well-known problem is inhomogeneous provision of rehabilitative services, as stressed by MoH, requiring appropriate criteria and parameters to plan rehabilitation actions. According to the Italian National Rehabilitation Plan, Comorbidity, Disability and Clinical Complexity should be assessed to define the patient’s real needs. However, to date, clinical complexity is still difficult to measure with shared and validated tools. The study aims to psychometrically validate the Italian Rehabilitation Complexity Scale-Extended v13 (RCS-E v13), in order to meet the guidelines requirements. An observational multicentre prospective cohort study, involving 8 intensive rehabilitation facilities of the Emilia-Romagna Region and 1712 in-patients, [823 male (48%) and 889 female (52%), mean age 68.34 years (95% CI 67.69–69.00 years)] showing neurological, orthopaedic and cardiological problems, was carried out. The construct and concurrent validity of the RCS-E v13 was confirmed through its correlation to Barthel Index (disability) and Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (comorbidity) and appropriate admission criteria (not yet published), respectively. Furthermore, the factor analysis indicated two different components (“Basic Care or Risk—Equipment” and “Medical—Nursing Needs and Therapy Disciplines”) of the RCS-E v13. In conclusion, the Italian RCS-E v13 appears to be a useful tool to assess clinical complexity in the Italian rehab scenario case-mix and its psychometric validation may have an important clinical rehabilitation impact allowing the assessment of the rehabilitation needs considering all three dimensions (disability, comorbidity and clinical complexity) as required by the Guidelines and the inhomogeneity could be reduced.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0178453
Pages (from-to)1-15
Number of pages15
JournalPLoS One
Volume12
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 1 2017

Fingerprint

rehabilitation (people)
Psychometrics
Patient rehabilitation
Rehabilitation
Comorbidity
Italy
Guidelines
rating scales
Needs Assessment
Diagnosis-Related Groups
orthopedics
Orthopedics
Factor analysis
cohort studies
Statistical Factor Analysis
Cohort Studies
Prospective Studies
therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)

Cite this

Roda, F., Agosti, M., Merlo, A., Maini, M., Lombardi, F., Tedeschi, C., ... GRECo (2017). Psychometric validation of the Italian Rehabilitation Complexity Scale-Extended version 13. PLoS One, 12(10), 1-15. [e0178453]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178453

Psychometric validation of the Italian Rehabilitation Complexity Scale-Extended version 13. / Roda, Francesca; Agosti, Maurizio; Merlo, Andrea; Maini, Maurizio; Lombardi, Francesco; Tedeschi, Claudio; Benedetti, Maria Grazia; Basaglia, Nino; Contini, Mara; Nicolotti, Domenico; Brianti, Rodolfo; GRECo.

In: PLoS One, Vol. 12, No. 10, e0178453, 01.10.2017, p. 1-15.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Roda, F, Agosti, M, Merlo, A, Maini, M, Lombardi, F, Tedeschi, C, Benedetti, MG, Basaglia, N, Contini, M, Nicolotti, D, Brianti, R & GRECo 2017, 'Psychometric validation of the Italian Rehabilitation Complexity Scale-Extended version 13', PLoS One, vol. 12, no. 10, e0178453, pp. 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178453
Roda, Francesca ; Agosti, Maurizio ; Merlo, Andrea ; Maini, Maurizio ; Lombardi, Francesco ; Tedeschi, Claudio ; Benedetti, Maria Grazia ; Basaglia, Nino ; Contini, Mara ; Nicolotti, Domenico ; Brianti, Rodolfo ; GRECo. / Psychometric validation of the Italian Rehabilitation Complexity Scale-Extended version 13. In: PLoS One. 2017 ; Vol. 12, No. 10. pp. 1-15.
@article{d0e4acbdaf9742ab8c56ce831a347772,
title = "Psychometric validation of the Italian Rehabilitation Complexity Scale-Extended version 13",
abstract = "In Italy, at present, a well-known problem is inhomogeneous provision of rehabilitative services, as stressed by MoH, requiring appropriate criteria and parameters to plan rehabilitation actions. According to the Italian National Rehabilitation Plan, Comorbidity, Disability and Clinical Complexity should be assessed to define the patient’s real needs. However, to date, clinical complexity is still difficult to measure with shared and validated tools. The study aims to psychometrically validate the Italian Rehabilitation Complexity Scale-Extended v13 (RCS-E v13), in order to meet the guidelines requirements. An observational multicentre prospective cohort study, involving 8 intensive rehabilitation facilities of the Emilia-Romagna Region and 1712 in-patients, [823 male (48{\%}) and 889 female (52{\%}), mean age 68.34 years (95{\%} CI 67.69–69.00 years)] showing neurological, orthopaedic and cardiological problems, was carried out. The construct and concurrent validity of the RCS-E v13 was confirmed through its correlation to Barthel Index (disability) and Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (comorbidity) and appropriate admission criteria (not yet published), respectively. Furthermore, the factor analysis indicated two different components (“Basic Care or Risk—Equipment” and “Medical—Nursing Needs and Therapy Disciplines”) of the RCS-E v13. In conclusion, the Italian RCS-E v13 appears to be a useful tool to assess clinical complexity in the Italian rehab scenario case-mix and its psychometric validation may have an important clinical rehabilitation impact allowing the assessment of the rehabilitation needs considering all three dimensions (disability, comorbidity and clinical complexity) as required by the Guidelines and the inhomogeneity could be reduced.",
author = "Francesca Roda and Maurizio Agosti and Andrea Merlo and Maurizio Maini and Francesco Lombardi and Claudio Tedeschi and Benedetti, {Maria Grazia} and Nino Basaglia and Mara Contini and Domenico Nicolotti and Rodolfo Brianti and GRECo",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0178453",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "1--15",
journal = "PLoS One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Psychometric validation of the Italian Rehabilitation Complexity Scale-Extended version 13

AU - Roda, Francesca

AU - Agosti, Maurizio

AU - Merlo, Andrea

AU - Maini, Maurizio

AU - Lombardi, Francesco

AU - Tedeschi, Claudio

AU - Benedetti, Maria Grazia

AU - Basaglia, Nino

AU - Contini, Mara

AU - Nicolotti, Domenico

AU - Brianti, Rodolfo

AU - GRECo

PY - 2017/10/1

Y1 - 2017/10/1

N2 - In Italy, at present, a well-known problem is inhomogeneous provision of rehabilitative services, as stressed by MoH, requiring appropriate criteria and parameters to plan rehabilitation actions. According to the Italian National Rehabilitation Plan, Comorbidity, Disability and Clinical Complexity should be assessed to define the patient’s real needs. However, to date, clinical complexity is still difficult to measure with shared and validated tools. The study aims to psychometrically validate the Italian Rehabilitation Complexity Scale-Extended v13 (RCS-E v13), in order to meet the guidelines requirements. An observational multicentre prospective cohort study, involving 8 intensive rehabilitation facilities of the Emilia-Romagna Region and 1712 in-patients, [823 male (48%) and 889 female (52%), mean age 68.34 years (95% CI 67.69–69.00 years)] showing neurological, orthopaedic and cardiological problems, was carried out. The construct and concurrent validity of the RCS-E v13 was confirmed through its correlation to Barthel Index (disability) and Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (comorbidity) and appropriate admission criteria (not yet published), respectively. Furthermore, the factor analysis indicated two different components (“Basic Care or Risk—Equipment” and “Medical—Nursing Needs and Therapy Disciplines”) of the RCS-E v13. In conclusion, the Italian RCS-E v13 appears to be a useful tool to assess clinical complexity in the Italian rehab scenario case-mix and its psychometric validation may have an important clinical rehabilitation impact allowing the assessment of the rehabilitation needs considering all three dimensions (disability, comorbidity and clinical complexity) as required by the Guidelines and the inhomogeneity could be reduced.

AB - In Italy, at present, a well-known problem is inhomogeneous provision of rehabilitative services, as stressed by MoH, requiring appropriate criteria and parameters to plan rehabilitation actions. According to the Italian National Rehabilitation Plan, Comorbidity, Disability and Clinical Complexity should be assessed to define the patient’s real needs. However, to date, clinical complexity is still difficult to measure with shared and validated tools. The study aims to psychometrically validate the Italian Rehabilitation Complexity Scale-Extended v13 (RCS-E v13), in order to meet the guidelines requirements. An observational multicentre prospective cohort study, involving 8 intensive rehabilitation facilities of the Emilia-Romagna Region and 1712 in-patients, [823 male (48%) and 889 female (52%), mean age 68.34 years (95% CI 67.69–69.00 years)] showing neurological, orthopaedic and cardiological problems, was carried out. The construct and concurrent validity of the RCS-E v13 was confirmed through its correlation to Barthel Index (disability) and Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (comorbidity) and appropriate admission criteria (not yet published), respectively. Furthermore, the factor analysis indicated two different components (“Basic Care or Risk—Equipment” and “Medical—Nursing Needs and Therapy Disciplines”) of the RCS-E v13. In conclusion, the Italian RCS-E v13 appears to be a useful tool to assess clinical complexity in the Italian rehab scenario case-mix and its psychometric validation may have an important clinical rehabilitation impact allowing the assessment of the rehabilitation needs considering all three dimensions (disability, comorbidity and clinical complexity) as required by the Guidelines and the inhomogeneity could be reduced.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031712638&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85031712638&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0178453

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0178453

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 1

EP - 15

JO - PLoS One

JF - PLoS One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 10

M1 - e0178453

ER -