Pulse high-volume hemofiltration in critically ill patients: A new approach for patients with septic shock

Ranistha Ratanarat, Alessandra Brendolan, Zaccaria Ricci, Gabriella Salvatori, Federico Nalesso, Massimo De Cal, Stefania Cazzavillan, Dimitris Petras, Monica Bonello, Valeria Bordoni, Dinna Cruz, North Techawathanawanna, Claudio Ronco

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Mortality rates in septic shock remain unacceptably high despite advances in our understanding of the syndrome and its treatment. Humoral factors are increasingly recognized to participate in the pathogenesis of septic shockgiving a biological rationale to therapies that might remove varied and potentially dangerous humoral mediators. While plasma water exchange in the form of hemofiltration can remove circulating cytokines in septic patientsthe procedureas routinely performeddoes not have a substantial impact on their plasma levels. More intensive plasma water exchangeas high-volume hemofiltration (HVHF)can reduce levels of these mediators and potentially improve clinical outcomes. How ever there are concerns about the feasibility and costs of HVHF as a continuous modality - very high volumes are difficult to maintain over 24 hours and solute kinetics are not optimized by this regimen. We propose pulse HVHF (PHVHF) - HVHF of 85 ml/kg/hr for 6-8 hours followed by continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) of 35 ml/kg/hr for 16-18 hours - as a new method to combine the advantages of HVHF improve solute kinetics and minimize logistic problems. We treated 15 critically ill patients with severe sepsis and septic shock using daily PHVHF in order to evaluate the feasibility of the technique its effects on hemodynamic sand the impact of the treatment on pathologic apoptosis in sepsis. Hemodynamic improvements were obtained after 6 hours of PHVHF and were maintained subsequently by standard CVV Has demonstrated by the reduction in norepinephrine dose. PHVHFbut not CVVHsignificantly reduces apoptotic plasma activity within 1 hour and the pattern was maintained in the following hours. PHVHF appears to be a feasible modality that may provide the same or greater benefits as HVHFwhile reducing the workload and cost.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)69-74
Number of pages6
JournalSeminars in Dialysis
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2006

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nephrology


Dive into the research topics of 'Pulse high-volume hemofiltration in critically ill patients: A new approach for patients with septic shock'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this