Qualitatively different forms of pure alexia

Cristina Rosazza, Ildebrando Appollonio, Valeria Isella, Tim Shallice

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this study we investigated two patients with pure alexia, F.C. and L.D.S., in order to make inferences about how processes and levels involved in the early stage of visual word recognition are organized and how they can be selectively damaged. Moreover, we investigated whether pure alexia can be caused by different functional deficits. F.C. and L.D.S. were presented with tasks of letter processing and tasks of orthographic integration. There was a clear double dissociation between the pattern of performance of F.C. and L.D.S. F.C. was able to process single letters rapidly and accurately, but was unable to group together the letters that he had correctly identified. By contrast, L.D.S. was slower and more impaired at letter identification, but she could use letter groups to assist reading. Thus, two different forms of pure alexia emerged: F.C. has a higher level deficit in integrating letters, whereas L.D.S. has a lower level deficit in letter processing. The results support the assumption of a functional organization of the reading process that involves a series of orthographic units (i.e., single letters, sublexical letter groups, and the lexical unit), which can be selectively damaged. Finally, our data present difficulties for models of pure alexia that assume all patients to have a low-level processing deficit.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)393-418
Number of pages26
JournalCognitive Neuropsychology
Volume24
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2007

Fingerprint

Pure Alexia
Reading
Letters

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

Rosazza, C., Appollonio, I., Isella, V., & Shallice, T. (2007). Qualitatively different forms of pure alexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 24(4), 393-418. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290701377877

Qualitatively different forms of pure alexia. / Rosazza, Cristina; Appollonio, Ildebrando; Isella, Valeria; Shallice, Tim.

In: Cognitive Neuropsychology, Vol. 24, No. 4, 06.2007, p. 393-418.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rosazza, C, Appollonio, I, Isella, V & Shallice, T 2007, 'Qualitatively different forms of pure alexia', Cognitive Neuropsychology, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 393-418. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290701377877
Rosazza C, Appollonio I, Isella V, Shallice T. Qualitatively different forms of pure alexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology. 2007 Jun;24(4):393-418. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290701377877
Rosazza, Cristina ; Appollonio, Ildebrando ; Isella, Valeria ; Shallice, Tim. / Qualitatively different forms of pure alexia. In: Cognitive Neuropsychology. 2007 ; Vol. 24, No. 4. pp. 393-418.
@article{7a9677e84c08412887b35122ed245861,
title = "Qualitatively different forms of pure alexia",
abstract = "In this study we investigated two patients with pure alexia, F.C. and L.D.S., in order to make inferences about how processes and levels involved in the early stage of visual word recognition are organized and how they can be selectively damaged. Moreover, we investigated whether pure alexia can be caused by different functional deficits. F.C. and L.D.S. were presented with tasks of letter processing and tasks of orthographic integration. There was a clear double dissociation between the pattern of performance of F.C. and L.D.S. F.C. was able to process single letters rapidly and accurately, but was unable to group together the letters that he had correctly identified. By contrast, L.D.S. was slower and more impaired at letter identification, but she could use letter groups to assist reading. Thus, two different forms of pure alexia emerged: F.C. has a higher level deficit in integrating letters, whereas L.D.S. has a lower level deficit in letter processing. The results support the assumption of a functional organization of the reading process that involves a series of orthographic units (i.e., single letters, sublexical letter groups, and the lexical unit), which can be selectively damaged. Finally, our data present difficulties for models of pure alexia that assume all patients to have a low-level processing deficit.",
author = "Cristina Rosazza and Ildebrando Appollonio and Valeria Isella and Tim Shallice",
year = "2007",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1080/02643290701377877",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "393--418",
journal = "Cognitive Neuropsychology",
issn = "0264-3294",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Qualitatively different forms of pure alexia

AU - Rosazza, Cristina

AU - Appollonio, Ildebrando

AU - Isella, Valeria

AU - Shallice, Tim

PY - 2007/6

Y1 - 2007/6

N2 - In this study we investigated two patients with pure alexia, F.C. and L.D.S., in order to make inferences about how processes and levels involved in the early stage of visual word recognition are organized and how they can be selectively damaged. Moreover, we investigated whether pure alexia can be caused by different functional deficits. F.C. and L.D.S. were presented with tasks of letter processing and tasks of orthographic integration. There was a clear double dissociation between the pattern of performance of F.C. and L.D.S. F.C. was able to process single letters rapidly and accurately, but was unable to group together the letters that he had correctly identified. By contrast, L.D.S. was slower and more impaired at letter identification, but she could use letter groups to assist reading. Thus, two different forms of pure alexia emerged: F.C. has a higher level deficit in integrating letters, whereas L.D.S. has a lower level deficit in letter processing. The results support the assumption of a functional organization of the reading process that involves a series of orthographic units (i.e., single letters, sublexical letter groups, and the lexical unit), which can be selectively damaged. Finally, our data present difficulties for models of pure alexia that assume all patients to have a low-level processing deficit.

AB - In this study we investigated two patients with pure alexia, F.C. and L.D.S., in order to make inferences about how processes and levels involved in the early stage of visual word recognition are organized and how they can be selectively damaged. Moreover, we investigated whether pure alexia can be caused by different functional deficits. F.C. and L.D.S. were presented with tasks of letter processing and tasks of orthographic integration. There was a clear double dissociation between the pattern of performance of F.C. and L.D.S. F.C. was able to process single letters rapidly and accurately, but was unable to group together the letters that he had correctly identified. By contrast, L.D.S. was slower and more impaired at letter identification, but she could use letter groups to assist reading. Thus, two different forms of pure alexia emerged: F.C. has a higher level deficit in integrating letters, whereas L.D.S. has a lower level deficit in letter processing. The results support the assumption of a functional organization of the reading process that involves a series of orthographic units (i.e., single letters, sublexical letter groups, and the lexical unit), which can be selectively damaged. Finally, our data present difficulties for models of pure alexia that assume all patients to have a low-level processing deficit.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34250344091&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34250344091&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02643290701377877

DO - 10.1080/02643290701377877

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 393

EP - 418

JO - Cognitive Neuropsychology

JF - Cognitive Neuropsychology

SN - 0264-3294

IS - 4

ER -