Quality appraisal of documents producing recommendations for breast, colorectal and cervical cancer screening

Paolo Giorgi Rossi, Eliana Ferroni, Alessandra Barca, Pamela Pantano, Laura Camilloni, Carla Cogo, Marica Ferri, Piero Borgia, Antonio Federici

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening are evidence-based interventions recommended by most governmental agencies and scientific societies. The aim of this review is to assess the quality of guidelines on screening and to describe differences according to the context in which they were produced.

Methods: A literature search of the main databases, websites on health care, and guidelines, as well as the websites of several scientific societies was carried out in order to identify the most recent guidelines (since 2000) on cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer screening. Only documents written in Italian or English were included. Two investigators independently assessed quality by using the AGREE (Appraisal of Guidelines, Research and Evaluation in Europe) instrument.

Results: Thirty-three, 32, and 18 relevant documents for cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer, respectively, were identified. Only some documents (19, 12 and 13 for cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer, respectively) could be evaluated with AGREE. Items included in the domain “scope and purpose” obtained the highest scores, followed by “clarity of presentation” domain, while “applicability”, “patient involvement,” and “conflict of interest disclosure” domains obtained the lowest scores. The quality did not improve in more recent documents. Documents produced by governmental agencies, on average, had higher scores than documents by scientific societies, particularly for “stakeholder involvement” and “applicability”.

Conclusions: Documents from different countries and health systems differ in terms of the main recommendations given and in the quality of the documents. Those produced by governmental agencies have a more multidisciplinary authorship and pay more attention to applicability than do those produced by scientific societies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e9062-1-e9062-22
JournalEpidemiology Biostatistics and Public Health
Volume11
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Keywords

  • Cancer screening
  • Guidelines as topics
  • Prevention and public health guidelines
  • Quality appraisal

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Community and Home Care

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Quality appraisal of documents producing recommendations for breast, colorectal and cervical cancer screening'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this