Quality control for histological grading in breast cancer

An italian experience

M. E. Cortese, E. Marubini, A. Paradiso, J. Rosai, L. Saragoni, Paolo Verderio, M. Aldi, L. Andreini, S. Bianchi, P. Cossu Rocca, G. De Rosa, C. Giardina, G. Lanzanova, F. Marandino, F. Marzullo, F. Nuzzo, N. Ravarino, M. Ricci, A. Zito

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although the diagnostic criteria for histological grading in breast cancer have been improved by the introduction of the Nottingham/Tenovus classification, good results in terms of reproducibility are hard to obtain. The objective of this study was to validate a methodological protocol for external quality control. We assessed the intra- and interlaboratory reproducibility for grading score and its components. Our findings revealed a less than optimal level of agreement for both intra-observer and interobserver reproducibility. Each grading class contributed in a different way to the reproducibility and class G2 provided the poorest contribution to the observed agreement. Nuclear pleomorphism appeared to be the least reproducible, followed by mitotic count and tubule formation. In conclusion, our results suggest the need for quality control programs that should be conceived as a dynamic feedback process to better understand the reasons for some unsatisfactory performances and to implement the necessary corrective actions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-6
Number of pages6
JournalPathologica
Volume97
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2005

Fingerprint

Quality Control
Breast Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Breast cancer
  • Histological grading
  • Interobserver reproducibility
  • Intraobserver reproducibility
  • Quality control

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Cite this

Cortese, M. E., Marubini, E., Paradiso, A., Rosai, J., Saragoni, L., Verderio, P., ... Zito, A. (2005). Quality control for histological grading in breast cancer: An italian experience. Pathologica, 97(1), 1-6.

Quality control for histological grading in breast cancer : An italian experience. / Cortese, M. E.; Marubini, E.; Paradiso, A.; Rosai, J.; Saragoni, L.; Verderio, Paolo; Aldi, M.; Andreini, L.; Bianchi, S.; Cossu Rocca, P.; De Rosa, G.; Giardina, C.; Lanzanova, G.; Marandino, F.; Marzullo, F.; Nuzzo, F.; Ravarino, N.; Ricci, M.; Zito, A.

In: Pathologica, Vol. 97, No. 1, 02.2005, p. 1-6.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cortese, ME, Marubini, E, Paradiso, A, Rosai, J, Saragoni, L, Verderio, P, Aldi, M, Andreini, L, Bianchi, S, Cossu Rocca, P, De Rosa, G, Giardina, C, Lanzanova, G, Marandino, F, Marzullo, F, Nuzzo, F, Ravarino, N, Ricci, M & Zito, A 2005, 'Quality control for histological grading in breast cancer: An italian experience', Pathologica, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 1-6.
Cortese, M. E. ; Marubini, E. ; Paradiso, A. ; Rosai, J. ; Saragoni, L. ; Verderio, Paolo ; Aldi, M. ; Andreini, L. ; Bianchi, S. ; Cossu Rocca, P. ; De Rosa, G. ; Giardina, C. ; Lanzanova, G. ; Marandino, F. ; Marzullo, F. ; Nuzzo, F. ; Ravarino, N. ; Ricci, M. ; Zito, A. / Quality control for histological grading in breast cancer : An italian experience. In: Pathologica. 2005 ; Vol. 97, No. 1. pp. 1-6.
@article{fad6363bad154e6c97ebea50d7ed12e4,
title = "Quality control for histological grading in breast cancer: An italian experience",
abstract = "Although the diagnostic criteria for histological grading in breast cancer have been improved by the introduction of the Nottingham/Tenovus classification, good results in terms of reproducibility are hard to obtain. The objective of this study was to validate a methodological protocol for external quality control. We assessed the intra- and interlaboratory reproducibility for grading score and its components. Our findings revealed a less than optimal level of agreement for both intra-observer and interobserver reproducibility. Each grading class contributed in a different way to the reproducibility and class G2 provided the poorest contribution to the observed agreement. Nuclear pleomorphism appeared to be the least reproducible, followed by mitotic count and tubule formation. In conclusion, our results suggest the need for quality control programs that should be conceived as a dynamic feedback process to better understand the reasons for some unsatisfactory performances and to implement the necessary corrective actions.",
keywords = "Breast cancer, Histological grading, Interobserver reproducibility, Intraobserver reproducibility, Quality control",
author = "Cortese, {M. E.} and E. Marubini and A. Paradiso and J. Rosai and L. Saragoni and Paolo Verderio and M. Aldi and L. Andreini and S. Bianchi and {Cossu Rocca}, P. and {De Rosa}, G. and C. Giardina and G. Lanzanova and F. Marandino and F. Marzullo and F. Nuzzo and N. Ravarino and M. Ricci and A. Zito",
year = "2005",
month = "2",
language = "English",
volume = "97",
pages = "1--6",
journal = "Pathologica",
issn = "0031-2983",
publisher = "Pacini Editore s.r.l.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quality control for histological grading in breast cancer

T2 - An italian experience

AU - Cortese, M. E.

AU - Marubini, E.

AU - Paradiso, A.

AU - Rosai, J.

AU - Saragoni, L.

AU - Verderio, Paolo

AU - Aldi, M.

AU - Andreini, L.

AU - Bianchi, S.

AU - Cossu Rocca, P.

AU - De Rosa, G.

AU - Giardina, C.

AU - Lanzanova, G.

AU - Marandino, F.

AU - Marzullo, F.

AU - Nuzzo, F.

AU - Ravarino, N.

AU - Ricci, M.

AU - Zito, A.

PY - 2005/2

Y1 - 2005/2

N2 - Although the diagnostic criteria for histological grading in breast cancer have been improved by the introduction of the Nottingham/Tenovus classification, good results in terms of reproducibility are hard to obtain. The objective of this study was to validate a methodological protocol for external quality control. We assessed the intra- and interlaboratory reproducibility for grading score and its components. Our findings revealed a less than optimal level of agreement for both intra-observer and interobserver reproducibility. Each grading class contributed in a different way to the reproducibility and class G2 provided the poorest contribution to the observed agreement. Nuclear pleomorphism appeared to be the least reproducible, followed by mitotic count and tubule formation. In conclusion, our results suggest the need for quality control programs that should be conceived as a dynamic feedback process to better understand the reasons for some unsatisfactory performances and to implement the necessary corrective actions.

AB - Although the diagnostic criteria for histological grading in breast cancer have been improved by the introduction of the Nottingham/Tenovus classification, good results in terms of reproducibility are hard to obtain. The objective of this study was to validate a methodological protocol for external quality control. We assessed the intra- and interlaboratory reproducibility for grading score and its components. Our findings revealed a less than optimal level of agreement for both intra-observer and interobserver reproducibility. Each grading class contributed in a different way to the reproducibility and class G2 provided the poorest contribution to the observed agreement. Nuclear pleomorphism appeared to be the least reproducible, followed by mitotic count and tubule formation. In conclusion, our results suggest the need for quality control programs that should be conceived as a dynamic feedback process to better understand the reasons for some unsatisfactory performances and to implement the necessary corrective actions.

KW - Breast cancer

KW - Histological grading

KW - Interobserver reproducibility

KW - Intraobserver reproducibility

KW - Quality control

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=20444410372&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=20444410372&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 97

SP - 1

EP - 6

JO - Pathologica

JF - Pathologica

SN - 0031-2983

IS - 1

ER -