Quality indicators in headache care: an implementation study in six Italian specialist-care centres

L. Pellesi, Silvia Benemei, V. Favoni, Carla Lupi, E. Mampreso, A. Negro, M. Paolucci, Timothy J. Steiner, M. Ulivi, S. Cevoli, Simona Guerzoni

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Headache disorders are highly prevalent, and have a substantial and negative impact on health worldwide. They are largely treatable, but differences in structure, objectives, organization and delivery affect the quality of headache care. In order to recognize and remedy deficiencies in care, the Global Campaign against Headache, in collaboration with the European Headache Federation, recently developed a set of quality indicators for headache services. These require further assessment to demonstrate fitness for purpose. This is their first implementation to evaluate quality in headache care as a multicentre national study. Methods: Between September and December 2016, we applied the quality indicators in six Italian specialist headache centres (Bologna, Firenze, Modena, Padova, Roma Campus Bio-Medico and Roma Sapienza). We used five previously developed assessment instruments, translated into Italian according to Lifting The Burden’s translation protocol for hybrid documents. We took data from 360 consecutive patients (60 per centre) by questionnaire and from their medical records, and by different questionnaires from their health-care providers (HCPs), including physicians, nurses, psychologists and nursing assistants. Results: The findings, comparable between centres, confirmed the feasibility and practicability of using the quality indicators in Italian specialist headache centres. The questionnaires were easily understood by HCPs and patients, and were not unduly time-consuming. Diagnoses were almost all (> 97%) according to ICHD criteria, and routinely (100%) reviewed during follow-up. Diagnostic diaries were regularly used by 96% of physicians. Referral pathways from primary to specialist care existed in five of the six clinics, as did urgent referral pathways. Instruments to assess disability and quality of life were not used regularly, a deficiency that needs to be addressed. Conclusion: This Italy-wide survey confirmed in six specialist centres that the headache service quality indicators are fit for purpose. By establishing majority practice, identifying commonalities and detecting deficits as a guide to quality improvement, the quality indicators may be used to set benchmarks for quality assessment. The next step is extend use and evaluation of the indicators into non-specialist care.

Original languageEnglish
Article number55
JournalJournal of Headache and Pain
Volume18
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 1 2017

Fingerprint

Headache
Roma
Health Personnel
Referral and Consultation
Physicians
Benchmarking
Headache Disorders
Quality of Health Care
Quality Improvement
Italy
Multicenter Studies
Medical Records
Nursing
Nurses
Quality of Life
Organizations
Psychology
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Benchmarking
  • Global Campaign against Headache
  • Headache care
  • Headache disorders
  • Service quality evaluation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Pellesi, L., Benemei, S., Favoni, V., Lupi, C., Mampreso, E., Negro, A., ... Guerzoni, S. (2017). Quality indicators in headache care: an implementation study in six Italian specialist-care centres. Journal of Headache and Pain, 18(1), [55]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-017-0762-x

Quality indicators in headache care : an implementation study in six Italian specialist-care centres. / Pellesi, L.; Benemei, Silvia; Favoni, V.; Lupi, Carla; Mampreso, E.; Negro, A.; Paolucci, M.; Steiner, Timothy J.; Ulivi, M.; Cevoli, S.; Guerzoni, Simona.

In: Journal of Headache and Pain, Vol. 18, No. 1, 55, 01.12.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pellesi, L, Benemei, S, Favoni, V, Lupi, C, Mampreso, E, Negro, A, Paolucci, M, Steiner, TJ, Ulivi, M, Cevoli, S & Guerzoni, S 2017, 'Quality indicators in headache care: an implementation study in six Italian specialist-care centres', Journal of Headache and Pain, vol. 18, no. 1, 55. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-017-0762-x
Pellesi, L. ; Benemei, Silvia ; Favoni, V. ; Lupi, Carla ; Mampreso, E. ; Negro, A. ; Paolucci, M. ; Steiner, Timothy J. ; Ulivi, M. ; Cevoli, S. ; Guerzoni, Simona. / Quality indicators in headache care : an implementation study in six Italian specialist-care centres. In: Journal of Headache and Pain. 2017 ; Vol. 18, No. 1.
@article{44c51b7503a1435c837b85ffa8529730,
title = "Quality indicators in headache care: an implementation study in six Italian specialist-care centres",
abstract = "Background: Headache disorders are highly prevalent, and have a substantial and negative impact on health worldwide. They are largely treatable, but differences in structure, objectives, organization and delivery affect the quality of headache care. In order to recognize and remedy deficiencies in care, the Global Campaign against Headache, in collaboration with the European Headache Federation, recently developed a set of quality indicators for headache services. These require further assessment to demonstrate fitness for purpose. This is their first implementation to evaluate quality in headache care as a multicentre national study. Methods: Between September and December 2016, we applied the quality indicators in six Italian specialist headache centres (Bologna, Firenze, Modena, Padova, Roma Campus Bio-Medico and Roma Sapienza). We used five previously developed assessment instruments, translated into Italian according to Lifting The Burden’s translation protocol for hybrid documents. We took data from 360 consecutive patients (60 per centre) by questionnaire and from their medical records, and by different questionnaires from their health-care providers (HCPs), including physicians, nurses, psychologists and nursing assistants. Results: The findings, comparable between centres, confirmed the feasibility and practicability of using the quality indicators in Italian specialist headache centres. The questionnaires were easily understood by HCPs and patients, and were not unduly time-consuming. Diagnoses were almost all (> 97{\%}) according to ICHD criteria, and routinely (100{\%}) reviewed during follow-up. Diagnostic diaries were regularly used by 96{\%} of physicians. Referral pathways from primary to specialist care existed in five of the six clinics, as did urgent referral pathways. Instruments to assess disability and quality of life were not used regularly, a deficiency that needs to be addressed. Conclusion: This Italy-wide survey confirmed in six specialist centres that the headache service quality indicators are fit for purpose. By establishing majority practice, identifying commonalities and detecting deficits as a guide to quality improvement, the quality indicators may be used to set benchmarks for quality assessment. The next step is extend use and evaluation of the indicators into non-specialist care.",
keywords = "Benchmarking, Global Campaign against Headache, Headache care, Headache disorders, Service quality evaluation",
author = "L. Pellesi and Silvia Benemei and V. Favoni and Carla Lupi and E. Mampreso and A. Negro and M. Paolucci and Steiner, {Timothy J.} and M. Ulivi and S. Cevoli and Simona Guerzoni",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1186/s10194-017-0762-x",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
journal = "Journal of Headache and Pain",
issn = "1129-2369",
publisher = "BioMed Central Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quality indicators in headache care

T2 - an implementation study in six Italian specialist-care centres

AU - Pellesi, L.

AU - Benemei, Silvia

AU - Favoni, V.

AU - Lupi, Carla

AU - Mampreso, E.

AU - Negro, A.

AU - Paolucci, M.

AU - Steiner, Timothy J.

AU - Ulivi, M.

AU - Cevoli, S.

AU - Guerzoni, Simona

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - Background: Headache disorders are highly prevalent, and have a substantial and negative impact on health worldwide. They are largely treatable, but differences in structure, objectives, organization and delivery affect the quality of headache care. In order to recognize and remedy deficiencies in care, the Global Campaign against Headache, in collaboration with the European Headache Federation, recently developed a set of quality indicators for headache services. These require further assessment to demonstrate fitness for purpose. This is their first implementation to evaluate quality in headache care as a multicentre national study. Methods: Between September and December 2016, we applied the quality indicators in six Italian specialist headache centres (Bologna, Firenze, Modena, Padova, Roma Campus Bio-Medico and Roma Sapienza). We used five previously developed assessment instruments, translated into Italian according to Lifting The Burden’s translation protocol for hybrid documents. We took data from 360 consecutive patients (60 per centre) by questionnaire and from their medical records, and by different questionnaires from their health-care providers (HCPs), including physicians, nurses, psychologists and nursing assistants. Results: The findings, comparable between centres, confirmed the feasibility and practicability of using the quality indicators in Italian specialist headache centres. The questionnaires were easily understood by HCPs and patients, and were not unduly time-consuming. Diagnoses were almost all (> 97%) according to ICHD criteria, and routinely (100%) reviewed during follow-up. Diagnostic diaries were regularly used by 96% of physicians. Referral pathways from primary to specialist care existed in five of the six clinics, as did urgent referral pathways. Instruments to assess disability and quality of life were not used regularly, a deficiency that needs to be addressed. Conclusion: This Italy-wide survey confirmed in six specialist centres that the headache service quality indicators are fit for purpose. By establishing majority practice, identifying commonalities and detecting deficits as a guide to quality improvement, the quality indicators may be used to set benchmarks for quality assessment. The next step is extend use and evaluation of the indicators into non-specialist care.

AB - Background: Headache disorders are highly prevalent, and have a substantial and negative impact on health worldwide. They are largely treatable, but differences in structure, objectives, organization and delivery affect the quality of headache care. In order to recognize and remedy deficiencies in care, the Global Campaign against Headache, in collaboration with the European Headache Federation, recently developed a set of quality indicators for headache services. These require further assessment to demonstrate fitness for purpose. This is their first implementation to evaluate quality in headache care as a multicentre national study. Methods: Between September and December 2016, we applied the quality indicators in six Italian specialist headache centres (Bologna, Firenze, Modena, Padova, Roma Campus Bio-Medico and Roma Sapienza). We used five previously developed assessment instruments, translated into Italian according to Lifting The Burden’s translation protocol for hybrid documents. We took data from 360 consecutive patients (60 per centre) by questionnaire and from their medical records, and by different questionnaires from their health-care providers (HCPs), including physicians, nurses, psychologists and nursing assistants. Results: The findings, comparable between centres, confirmed the feasibility and practicability of using the quality indicators in Italian specialist headache centres. The questionnaires were easily understood by HCPs and patients, and were not unduly time-consuming. Diagnoses were almost all (> 97%) according to ICHD criteria, and routinely (100%) reviewed during follow-up. Diagnostic diaries were regularly used by 96% of physicians. Referral pathways from primary to specialist care existed in five of the six clinics, as did urgent referral pathways. Instruments to assess disability and quality of life were not used regularly, a deficiency that needs to be addressed. Conclusion: This Italy-wide survey confirmed in six specialist centres that the headache service quality indicators are fit for purpose. By establishing majority practice, identifying commonalities and detecting deficits as a guide to quality improvement, the quality indicators may be used to set benchmarks for quality assessment. The next step is extend use and evaluation of the indicators into non-specialist care.

KW - Benchmarking

KW - Global Campaign against Headache

KW - Headache care

KW - Headache disorders

KW - Service quality evaluation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018785709&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85018785709&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s10194-017-0762-x

DO - 10.1186/s10194-017-0762-x

M3 - Article

C2 - 28477307

AN - SCOPUS:85018785709

VL - 18

JO - Journal of Headache and Pain

JF - Journal of Headache and Pain

SN - 1129-2369

IS - 1

M1 - 55

ER -