Quality of life after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis

Different questionnaires lead to different interpretations

Marco Scarpa, Cesare Ruffolo, Lino Polese, Alessandro Martin, Renata D'Incà, Giacomo C. Sturniolo, Davide F. D'Amico, Imerio Angriman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: According to some researchers, health-related quality-of-life scores for patients who undergo restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) for ulcerative colitis (UC) are comparable to those of healthy control subjects. Other studies show evidence that patients who undergo RPC experience a health-related quality of life similar to patients with mild UC or UC in remission. Hypothesis: The discrepancy in health-related quality-of-life scores among studies may be due to different health-related quality-of-life analyses. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Outpatient clinic of a tertiary care center. Patients: In the first phase of the study, we consecutively enrolled 24 patients with UC, 24 patients with Crohn disease, and 24 healthy controls. In the second phase of the study, 40 patients who underwent RPC, 43 patients with UC, and 44 controls were consecutively enrolled. Interventions: We administered an Italian version of the Cleveland Global Quality of Life (CGQL) instrument, the Padova Inflammatory Bowel Disease Quality of Life instrument, and the Italian 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey. Main Outcome Measures: We evaluated the construct validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, sensitivity to change, and discriminant ability of the Italian CGQL instrument. We compared its discriminative ability with that of the Padova Inflammatory Bowel Disease Quality of Life instrument. Results: The Italian CGQL instrument obtained good construct validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and sensitivity to change. The Italian CGQL score did not distinguish patients who underwent RPC from healthy controls and those with mild UC or UC in remission, while the Padova Inflammatory Bowel Disease Quality of Life instrument reported similar scores for patients who underwent RPC and those with mild UC or UC in remission, and showed a difference vs healthy controls. Conclusions: We validated an Italian version of the CGQL score. The different results obtained with the CGQL and the Padova Inflammatory Bowel Disease Quality of Life instruments can be attributed to the different discriminative ability of the 2 questionnaires.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)158-165
Number of pages8
JournalArchives of Surgery
Volume142
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2007

Fingerprint

Restorative Proctocolectomy
Ulcerative Colitis
Quality of Life
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
Surveys and Questionnaires
Reproducibility of Results
Ambulatory Care Facilities

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Quality of life after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis : Different questionnaires lead to different interpretations. / Scarpa, Marco; Ruffolo, Cesare; Polese, Lino; Martin, Alessandro; D'Incà, Renata; Sturniolo, Giacomo C.; D'Amico, Davide F.; Angriman, Imerio.

In: Archives of Surgery, Vol. 142, No. 2, 02.2007, p. 158-165.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Scarpa, M, Ruffolo, C, Polese, L, Martin, A, D'Incà, R, Sturniolo, GC, D'Amico, DF & Angriman, I 2007, 'Quality of life after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis: Different questionnaires lead to different interpretations', Archives of Surgery, vol. 142, no. 2, pp. 158-165. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.142.2.158
Scarpa, Marco ; Ruffolo, Cesare ; Polese, Lino ; Martin, Alessandro ; D'Incà, Renata ; Sturniolo, Giacomo C. ; D'Amico, Davide F. ; Angriman, Imerio. / Quality of life after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis : Different questionnaires lead to different interpretations. In: Archives of Surgery. 2007 ; Vol. 142, No. 2. pp. 158-165.
@article{62b02eea562c4697a9b1c8d83a59fd1d,
title = "Quality of life after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis: Different questionnaires lead to different interpretations",
abstract = "Background: According to some researchers, health-related quality-of-life scores for patients who undergo restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) for ulcerative colitis (UC) are comparable to those of healthy control subjects. Other studies show evidence that patients who undergo RPC experience a health-related quality of life similar to patients with mild UC or UC in remission. Hypothesis: The discrepancy in health-related quality-of-life scores among studies may be due to different health-related quality-of-life analyses. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Outpatient clinic of a tertiary care center. Patients: In the first phase of the study, we consecutively enrolled 24 patients with UC, 24 patients with Crohn disease, and 24 healthy controls. In the second phase of the study, 40 patients who underwent RPC, 43 patients with UC, and 44 controls were consecutively enrolled. Interventions: We administered an Italian version of the Cleveland Global Quality of Life (CGQL) instrument, the Padova Inflammatory Bowel Disease Quality of Life instrument, and the Italian 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey. Main Outcome Measures: We evaluated the construct validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, sensitivity to change, and discriminant ability of the Italian CGQL instrument. We compared its discriminative ability with that of the Padova Inflammatory Bowel Disease Quality of Life instrument. Results: The Italian CGQL instrument obtained good construct validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and sensitivity to change. The Italian CGQL score did not distinguish patients who underwent RPC from healthy controls and those with mild UC or UC in remission, while the Padova Inflammatory Bowel Disease Quality of Life instrument reported similar scores for patients who underwent RPC and those with mild UC or UC in remission, and showed a difference vs healthy controls. Conclusions: We validated an Italian version of the CGQL score. The different results obtained with the CGQL and the Padova Inflammatory Bowel Disease Quality of Life instruments can be attributed to the different discriminative ability of the 2 questionnaires.",
author = "Marco Scarpa and Cesare Ruffolo and Lino Polese and Alessandro Martin and Renata D'Inc{\`a} and Sturniolo, {Giacomo C.} and D'Amico, {Davide F.} and Imerio Angriman",
year = "2007",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1001/archsurg.142.2.158",
language = "English",
volume = "142",
pages = "158--165",
journal = "Archives of Surgery",
issn = "0004-0010",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quality of life after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis

T2 - Different questionnaires lead to different interpretations

AU - Scarpa, Marco

AU - Ruffolo, Cesare

AU - Polese, Lino

AU - Martin, Alessandro

AU - D'Incà, Renata

AU - Sturniolo, Giacomo C.

AU - D'Amico, Davide F.

AU - Angriman, Imerio

PY - 2007/2

Y1 - 2007/2

N2 - Background: According to some researchers, health-related quality-of-life scores for patients who undergo restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) for ulcerative colitis (UC) are comparable to those of healthy control subjects. Other studies show evidence that patients who undergo RPC experience a health-related quality of life similar to patients with mild UC or UC in remission. Hypothesis: The discrepancy in health-related quality-of-life scores among studies may be due to different health-related quality-of-life analyses. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Outpatient clinic of a tertiary care center. Patients: In the first phase of the study, we consecutively enrolled 24 patients with UC, 24 patients with Crohn disease, and 24 healthy controls. In the second phase of the study, 40 patients who underwent RPC, 43 patients with UC, and 44 controls were consecutively enrolled. Interventions: We administered an Italian version of the Cleveland Global Quality of Life (CGQL) instrument, the Padova Inflammatory Bowel Disease Quality of Life instrument, and the Italian 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey. Main Outcome Measures: We evaluated the construct validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, sensitivity to change, and discriminant ability of the Italian CGQL instrument. We compared its discriminative ability with that of the Padova Inflammatory Bowel Disease Quality of Life instrument. Results: The Italian CGQL instrument obtained good construct validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and sensitivity to change. The Italian CGQL score did not distinguish patients who underwent RPC from healthy controls and those with mild UC or UC in remission, while the Padova Inflammatory Bowel Disease Quality of Life instrument reported similar scores for patients who underwent RPC and those with mild UC or UC in remission, and showed a difference vs healthy controls. Conclusions: We validated an Italian version of the CGQL score. The different results obtained with the CGQL and the Padova Inflammatory Bowel Disease Quality of Life instruments can be attributed to the different discriminative ability of the 2 questionnaires.

AB - Background: According to some researchers, health-related quality-of-life scores for patients who undergo restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) for ulcerative colitis (UC) are comparable to those of healthy control subjects. Other studies show evidence that patients who undergo RPC experience a health-related quality of life similar to patients with mild UC or UC in remission. Hypothesis: The discrepancy in health-related quality-of-life scores among studies may be due to different health-related quality-of-life analyses. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Outpatient clinic of a tertiary care center. Patients: In the first phase of the study, we consecutively enrolled 24 patients with UC, 24 patients with Crohn disease, and 24 healthy controls. In the second phase of the study, 40 patients who underwent RPC, 43 patients with UC, and 44 controls were consecutively enrolled. Interventions: We administered an Italian version of the Cleveland Global Quality of Life (CGQL) instrument, the Padova Inflammatory Bowel Disease Quality of Life instrument, and the Italian 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey. Main Outcome Measures: We evaluated the construct validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, sensitivity to change, and discriminant ability of the Italian CGQL instrument. We compared its discriminative ability with that of the Padova Inflammatory Bowel Disease Quality of Life instrument. Results: The Italian CGQL instrument obtained good construct validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and sensitivity to change. The Italian CGQL score did not distinguish patients who underwent RPC from healthy controls and those with mild UC or UC in remission, while the Padova Inflammatory Bowel Disease Quality of Life instrument reported similar scores for patients who underwent RPC and those with mild UC or UC in remission, and showed a difference vs healthy controls. Conclusions: We validated an Italian version of the CGQL score. The different results obtained with the CGQL and the Padova Inflammatory Bowel Disease Quality of Life instruments can be attributed to the different discriminative ability of the 2 questionnaires.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33847157979&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33847157979&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/archsurg.142.2.158

DO - 10.1001/archsurg.142.2.158

M3 - Article

VL - 142

SP - 158

EP - 165

JO - Archives of Surgery

JF - Archives of Surgery

SN - 0004-0010

IS - 2

ER -