Quality of life in patients with dental conditions

Comparing patients' and providers' evaluation

F. Sampogna, V. Johansson, B. Axtelius, D. Abeni, B. Söderfeldt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. To measure the agreement between patients and their caregivers in evaluating patients' oral quality of life. Basic research design. Cross-sectional study. Clinical setting. Data collected in four Swedish dental clinics in 2004. Participants. Consecutive patients. Data were completed for 444 patients. Fifteen dentists and 12 dental hygienists agreed to participate. Interventions. For each patient, the patient him/herself and his/her caregiver completed the 14-item Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14), a specific instrument used to measure quality of life in oral conditions, with higher scores indicating a worse quality of life. Information on personal and clinical characteristics of patients were also collected. Main outcome measures. Median OHIP-14 scores given by caregivers and patients were calculated and compared in different subgroups of patients. Cohen's kappa was calculated to measure the agreement between the evaluation of patients and caregivers. Results. OHIP-14 scores median values were 3.0 among patients and 9.0 among caregivers. Caregivers always gave a higher score than patients, especially in older patients and patients with lower education. The concordance between patients' and caregivers' evaluation was very low (for different OHIP-14 cutoffs: Cohen's kappa from 0.10 to 0.15). Conclusions. In this study, great discrepancies were observed between patients and caregivers in the evaluation of patients' oral quality of life, with caregivers overestimating the burden of dental conditions on patients. It is important to improve patient-caregiver communication, in order to increase patient satisfaction and provide better care. A good patient-caregiver relationship is essential for the patients' well-being and their adherence to treatment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)234-238
Number of pages5
JournalCommunity Dental Health
Volume26
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2009

Fingerprint

Tooth
Quality of Life
Caregivers
Dental Hygienists
Dental Clinics
Oral Health
Dentists
Patient Satisfaction

Keywords

  • Communication
  • Odontology
  • Quality of life

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Quality of life in patients with dental conditions : Comparing patients' and providers' evaluation. / Sampogna, F.; Johansson, V.; Axtelius, B.; Abeni, D.; Söderfeldt, B.

In: Community Dental Health, Vol. 26, No. 4, 12.2009, p. 234-238.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sampogna, F. ; Johansson, V. ; Axtelius, B. ; Abeni, D. ; Söderfeldt, B. / Quality of life in patients with dental conditions : Comparing patients' and providers' evaluation. In: Community Dental Health. 2009 ; Vol. 26, No. 4. pp. 234-238.
@article{ab774c6da3064632b96e63bd2208ae57,
title = "Quality of life in patients with dental conditions: Comparing patients' and providers' evaluation",
abstract = "Objective. To measure the agreement between patients and their caregivers in evaluating patients' oral quality of life. Basic research design. Cross-sectional study. Clinical setting. Data collected in four Swedish dental clinics in 2004. Participants. Consecutive patients. Data were completed for 444 patients. Fifteen dentists and 12 dental hygienists agreed to participate. Interventions. For each patient, the patient him/herself and his/her caregiver completed the 14-item Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14), a specific instrument used to measure quality of life in oral conditions, with higher scores indicating a worse quality of life. Information on personal and clinical characteristics of patients were also collected. Main outcome measures. Median OHIP-14 scores given by caregivers and patients were calculated and compared in different subgroups of patients. Cohen's kappa was calculated to measure the agreement between the evaluation of patients and caregivers. Results. OHIP-14 scores median values were 3.0 among patients and 9.0 among caregivers. Caregivers always gave a higher score than patients, especially in older patients and patients with lower education. The concordance between patients' and caregivers' evaluation was very low (for different OHIP-14 cutoffs: Cohen's kappa from 0.10 to 0.15). Conclusions. In this study, great discrepancies were observed between patients and caregivers in the evaluation of patients' oral quality of life, with caregivers overestimating the burden of dental conditions on patients. It is important to improve patient-caregiver communication, in order to increase patient satisfaction and provide better care. A good patient-caregiver relationship is essential for the patients' well-being and their adherence to treatment.",
keywords = "Communication, Odontology, Quality of life",
author = "F. Sampogna and V. Johansson and B. Axtelius and D. Abeni and B. S{\"o}derfeldt",
year = "2009",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1922/CDH_2304Sampogna05",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "234--238",
journal = "Community Dental Health",
issn = "0265-539X",
publisher = "FDI World Dental Press Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quality of life in patients with dental conditions

T2 - Comparing patients' and providers' evaluation

AU - Sampogna, F.

AU - Johansson, V.

AU - Axtelius, B.

AU - Abeni, D.

AU - Söderfeldt, B.

PY - 2009/12

Y1 - 2009/12

N2 - Objective. To measure the agreement between patients and their caregivers in evaluating patients' oral quality of life. Basic research design. Cross-sectional study. Clinical setting. Data collected in four Swedish dental clinics in 2004. Participants. Consecutive patients. Data were completed for 444 patients. Fifteen dentists and 12 dental hygienists agreed to participate. Interventions. For each patient, the patient him/herself and his/her caregiver completed the 14-item Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14), a specific instrument used to measure quality of life in oral conditions, with higher scores indicating a worse quality of life. Information on personal and clinical characteristics of patients were also collected. Main outcome measures. Median OHIP-14 scores given by caregivers and patients were calculated and compared in different subgroups of patients. Cohen's kappa was calculated to measure the agreement between the evaluation of patients and caregivers. Results. OHIP-14 scores median values were 3.0 among patients and 9.0 among caregivers. Caregivers always gave a higher score than patients, especially in older patients and patients with lower education. The concordance between patients' and caregivers' evaluation was very low (for different OHIP-14 cutoffs: Cohen's kappa from 0.10 to 0.15). Conclusions. In this study, great discrepancies were observed between patients and caregivers in the evaluation of patients' oral quality of life, with caregivers overestimating the burden of dental conditions on patients. It is important to improve patient-caregiver communication, in order to increase patient satisfaction and provide better care. A good patient-caregiver relationship is essential for the patients' well-being and their adherence to treatment.

AB - Objective. To measure the agreement between patients and their caregivers in evaluating patients' oral quality of life. Basic research design. Cross-sectional study. Clinical setting. Data collected in four Swedish dental clinics in 2004. Participants. Consecutive patients. Data were completed for 444 patients. Fifteen dentists and 12 dental hygienists agreed to participate. Interventions. For each patient, the patient him/herself and his/her caregiver completed the 14-item Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14), a specific instrument used to measure quality of life in oral conditions, with higher scores indicating a worse quality of life. Information on personal and clinical characteristics of patients were also collected. Main outcome measures. Median OHIP-14 scores given by caregivers and patients were calculated and compared in different subgroups of patients. Cohen's kappa was calculated to measure the agreement between the evaluation of patients and caregivers. Results. OHIP-14 scores median values were 3.0 among patients and 9.0 among caregivers. Caregivers always gave a higher score than patients, especially in older patients and patients with lower education. The concordance between patients' and caregivers' evaluation was very low (for different OHIP-14 cutoffs: Cohen's kappa from 0.10 to 0.15). Conclusions. In this study, great discrepancies were observed between patients and caregivers in the evaluation of patients' oral quality of life, with caregivers overestimating the burden of dental conditions on patients. It is important to improve patient-caregiver communication, in order to increase patient satisfaction and provide better care. A good patient-caregiver relationship is essential for the patients' well-being and their adherence to treatment.

KW - Communication

KW - Odontology

KW - Quality of life

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=56749147297&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=56749147297&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1922/CDH_2304Sampogna05

DO - 10.1922/CDH_2304Sampogna05

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 234

EP - 238

JO - Community Dental Health

JF - Community Dental Health

SN - 0265-539X

IS - 4

ER -