Quantitative analysis of smooth pursuit eye movements by personal computer. II. Evaluation of individual performance and clinical applicability.

M. Versino, V. Cosi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In a previous report on quantitative analysis of smooth pursuit eye movements (SPEM) we assessed two equations in order to describe the SPEM gain/target velocity relationship, and we demonstrated that this relationship is age-related. This report presents a method to evaluate normality of a single subject SPEM performance. Three points have been considered: 1) The control of gain asymmetries depending on target direction (leftward vs rightward SPEM) 2) The definition of age-related control values 3) The subject vs control values comparison An example to explain how our method actually works and its clinical applicability is shown. Finally, the reasons why no choice has been made between the two equations are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)787-793
Number of pages7
JournalBollettino della Societa Italiana di Biologia Sperimentale
Volume66
Issue number8
Publication statusPublished - Aug 1990

Fingerprint

Smooth Pursuit
Microcomputers
Eye Movements

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

@article{9cf4b1ac8c1f4d4799b5103ecbda9344,
title = "Quantitative analysis of smooth pursuit eye movements by personal computer. II. Evaluation of individual performance and clinical applicability.",
abstract = "In a previous report on quantitative analysis of smooth pursuit eye movements (SPEM) we assessed two equations in order to describe the SPEM gain/target velocity relationship, and we demonstrated that this relationship is age-related. This report presents a method to evaluate normality of a single subject SPEM performance. Three points have been considered: 1) The control of gain asymmetries depending on target direction (leftward vs rightward SPEM) 2) The definition of age-related control values 3) The subject vs control values comparison An example to explain how our method actually works and its clinical applicability is shown. Finally, the reasons why no choice has been made between the two equations are discussed.",
author = "M. Versino and V. Cosi",
year = "1990",
month = "8",
language = "English",
volume = "66",
pages = "787--793",
journal = "Bollettino della Societa Italiana di Biologia Sperimentale",
issn = "0037-8771",
publisher = "Casa Editrice Idelson Gnocchi",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantitative analysis of smooth pursuit eye movements by personal computer. II. Evaluation of individual performance and clinical applicability.

AU - Versino, M.

AU - Cosi, V.

PY - 1990/8

Y1 - 1990/8

N2 - In a previous report on quantitative analysis of smooth pursuit eye movements (SPEM) we assessed two equations in order to describe the SPEM gain/target velocity relationship, and we demonstrated that this relationship is age-related. This report presents a method to evaluate normality of a single subject SPEM performance. Three points have been considered: 1) The control of gain asymmetries depending on target direction (leftward vs rightward SPEM) 2) The definition of age-related control values 3) The subject vs control values comparison An example to explain how our method actually works and its clinical applicability is shown. Finally, the reasons why no choice has been made between the two equations are discussed.

AB - In a previous report on quantitative analysis of smooth pursuit eye movements (SPEM) we assessed two equations in order to describe the SPEM gain/target velocity relationship, and we demonstrated that this relationship is age-related. This report presents a method to evaluate normality of a single subject SPEM performance. Three points have been considered: 1) The control of gain asymmetries depending on target direction (leftward vs rightward SPEM) 2) The definition of age-related control values 3) The subject vs control values comparison An example to explain how our method actually works and its clinical applicability is shown. Finally, the reasons why no choice has been made between the two equations are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025473699&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025473699&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 2291832

AN - SCOPUS:0025473699

VL - 66

SP - 787

EP - 793

JO - Bollettino della Societa Italiana di Biologia Sperimentale

JF - Bollettino della Societa Italiana di Biologia Sperimentale

SN - 0037-8771

IS - 8

ER -