Quantitative assessment of pivot-shift using inertial sensors

Nicola Lopomo, Cecilia Signorelli, Tommaso Bonanzinga, Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli, Andrea Visani, Stefano Zaffagnini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: The pivot-shift phenomenon has been identified to be one of the essential signs of functional anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) insufficiency. However, the pivot-shift test remains a surgeon-subjective examination, lacking a general recognized quantitative measurement. The goal of the present study was to validate the use of an inertial sensor for quantifying the pivot-shift test, using a commercial navigation system. Methods: An expert surgeon intra-operatively performed the pivot-shift test on 15 consecutive patients before ACL reconstruction. A single accelerometer and a commercial navigation system simultaneously acquired limb kinematics. An additional optical tracker mounted on the accelerometer allowed following sensor movements. Anteroposterior (a-p) tibial acceleration obtained with the navigation system was compared with three-dimensional (3D) acceleration acquired by the accelerometer. The effect of skin artifacts and test-retest positioning were estimated. Repeatability of the acceleration parameter and waveform was analyzed. Correlation between the two measurements was also assessed. Results: Average root mean square (RMS) error in test-retest positioning reported a good value of 5.5 ± 2.9 mm. Mean RMS displacement due to soft tissue artifacts was 4.9 ± 2.6 mm. The analysis of acceleration range repetitions reported a good intra-tester repeatability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.86). Inter-patients similarity analysis showed a mean acceleration waveform correlation of 0.88 ± 0.14. The acceleration ranges demonstrated a good positive correlation between the two measurements (rs = 0.72, P <0.05). Conclusion: This study showed good reliability of the new device and good correlation with the navigation system results. Therefore, the accelerometer is a valid method to assess dynamic joint laxity. Level of evidence: II.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)713-717
Number of pages5
JournalKnee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
Volume20
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2012

Fingerprint

Artifacts
Joint Instability
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Anterior Cruciate Ligament
Skin Tests
Biomechanical Phenomena
Extremities
Equipment and Supplies
Surgeons

Keywords

  • Acceleration
  • ACL
  • Knee kinematics
  • Navigation system
  • Pivot-shift

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Surgery

Cite this

Quantitative assessment of pivot-shift using inertial sensors. / Lopomo, Nicola; Signorelli, Cecilia; Bonanzinga, Tommaso; Muccioli, Giulio Maria Marcheggiani; Visani, Andrea; Zaffagnini, Stefano.

In: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, Vol. 20, No. 4, 04.2012, p. 713-717.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lopomo, Nicola ; Signorelli, Cecilia ; Bonanzinga, Tommaso ; Muccioli, Giulio Maria Marcheggiani ; Visani, Andrea ; Zaffagnini, Stefano. / Quantitative assessment of pivot-shift using inertial sensors. In: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2012 ; Vol. 20, No. 4. pp. 713-717.
@article{d8fa0ead184a4011994964b024c8dfc9,
title = "Quantitative assessment of pivot-shift using inertial sensors",
abstract = "Purpose: The pivot-shift phenomenon has been identified to be one of the essential signs of functional anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) insufficiency. However, the pivot-shift test remains a surgeon-subjective examination, lacking a general recognized quantitative measurement. The goal of the present study was to validate the use of an inertial sensor for quantifying the pivot-shift test, using a commercial navigation system. Methods: An expert surgeon intra-operatively performed the pivot-shift test on 15 consecutive patients before ACL reconstruction. A single accelerometer and a commercial navigation system simultaneously acquired limb kinematics. An additional optical tracker mounted on the accelerometer allowed following sensor movements. Anteroposterior (a-p) tibial acceleration obtained with the navigation system was compared with three-dimensional (3D) acceleration acquired by the accelerometer. The effect of skin artifacts and test-retest positioning were estimated. Repeatability of the acceleration parameter and waveform was analyzed. Correlation between the two measurements was also assessed. Results: Average root mean square (RMS) error in test-retest positioning reported a good value of 5.5 ± 2.9 mm. Mean RMS displacement due to soft tissue artifacts was 4.9 ± 2.6 mm. The analysis of acceleration range repetitions reported a good intra-tester repeatability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.86). Inter-patients similarity analysis showed a mean acceleration waveform correlation of 0.88 ± 0.14. The acceleration ranges demonstrated a good positive correlation between the two measurements (rs = 0.72, P <0.05). Conclusion: This study showed good reliability of the new device and good correlation with the navigation system results. Therefore, the accelerometer is a valid method to assess dynamic joint laxity. Level of evidence: II.",
keywords = "Acceleration, ACL, Knee kinematics, Navigation system, Pivot-shift",
author = "Nicola Lopomo and Cecilia Signorelli and Tommaso Bonanzinga and Muccioli, {Giulio Maria Marcheggiani} and Andrea Visani and Stefano Zaffagnini",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1007/s00167-011-1865-6",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "713--717",
journal = "Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy",
issn = "0942-2056",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantitative assessment of pivot-shift using inertial sensors

AU - Lopomo, Nicola

AU - Signorelli, Cecilia

AU - Bonanzinga, Tommaso

AU - Muccioli, Giulio Maria Marcheggiani

AU - Visani, Andrea

AU - Zaffagnini, Stefano

PY - 2012/4

Y1 - 2012/4

N2 - Purpose: The pivot-shift phenomenon has been identified to be one of the essential signs of functional anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) insufficiency. However, the pivot-shift test remains a surgeon-subjective examination, lacking a general recognized quantitative measurement. The goal of the present study was to validate the use of an inertial sensor for quantifying the pivot-shift test, using a commercial navigation system. Methods: An expert surgeon intra-operatively performed the pivot-shift test on 15 consecutive patients before ACL reconstruction. A single accelerometer and a commercial navigation system simultaneously acquired limb kinematics. An additional optical tracker mounted on the accelerometer allowed following sensor movements. Anteroposterior (a-p) tibial acceleration obtained with the navigation system was compared with three-dimensional (3D) acceleration acquired by the accelerometer. The effect of skin artifacts and test-retest positioning were estimated. Repeatability of the acceleration parameter and waveform was analyzed. Correlation between the two measurements was also assessed. Results: Average root mean square (RMS) error in test-retest positioning reported a good value of 5.5 ± 2.9 mm. Mean RMS displacement due to soft tissue artifacts was 4.9 ± 2.6 mm. The analysis of acceleration range repetitions reported a good intra-tester repeatability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.86). Inter-patients similarity analysis showed a mean acceleration waveform correlation of 0.88 ± 0.14. The acceleration ranges demonstrated a good positive correlation between the two measurements (rs = 0.72, P <0.05). Conclusion: This study showed good reliability of the new device and good correlation with the navigation system results. Therefore, the accelerometer is a valid method to assess dynamic joint laxity. Level of evidence: II.

AB - Purpose: The pivot-shift phenomenon has been identified to be one of the essential signs of functional anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) insufficiency. However, the pivot-shift test remains a surgeon-subjective examination, lacking a general recognized quantitative measurement. The goal of the present study was to validate the use of an inertial sensor for quantifying the pivot-shift test, using a commercial navigation system. Methods: An expert surgeon intra-operatively performed the pivot-shift test on 15 consecutive patients before ACL reconstruction. A single accelerometer and a commercial navigation system simultaneously acquired limb kinematics. An additional optical tracker mounted on the accelerometer allowed following sensor movements. Anteroposterior (a-p) tibial acceleration obtained with the navigation system was compared with three-dimensional (3D) acceleration acquired by the accelerometer. The effect of skin artifacts and test-retest positioning were estimated. Repeatability of the acceleration parameter and waveform was analyzed. Correlation between the two measurements was also assessed. Results: Average root mean square (RMS) error in test-retest positioning reported a good value of 5.5 ± 2.9 mm. Mean RMS displacement due to soft tissue artifacts was 4.9 ± 2.6 mm. The analysis of acceleration range repetitions reported a good intra-tester repeatability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.86). Inter-patients similarity analysis showed a mean acceleration waveform correlation of 0.88 ± 0.14. The acceleration ranges demonstrated a good positive correlation between the two measurements (rs = 0.72, P <0.05). Conclusion: This study showed good reliability of the new device and good correlation with the navigation system results. Therefore, the accelerometer is a valid method to assess dynamic joint laxity. Level of evidence: II.

KW - Acceleration

KW - ACL

KW - Knee kinematics

KW - Navigation system

KW - Pivot-shift

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84858753787&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84858753787&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00167-011-1865-6

DO - 10.1007/s00167-011-1865-6

M3 - Article

C2 - 22222615

AN - SCOPUS:84858753787

VL - 20

SP - 713

EP - 717

JO - Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

JF - Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

SN - 0942-2056

IS - 4

ER -