Radial late-SBP as a surrogate for central SBP

Yi Zhang, Davide Agnoletti, Athanase D. Protogerou, Ji Guang Wang, Jirar Topouchian, Paolo Salvi, Michel E. Safar, Jacques Blacher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Recent studies indicated that central SBP could be estimated by radial late-SBP (rSBP2) with a small disparity. However, most of these studies were conducted by SphygmoCor with a transfer function. The agreement between rSBP2 and central SBP was also tested in several invasive studies, but with inconsistent results. The objective of the present study was, therefore, to investigate whether rSBP2, from commercially available noninvasive devices, could practically indicate central SBP in current clinical care. Methods: We assessed carotid SPB (cSBP) and aortic SBP (aSBP) and rSBP2 by two broadly used tonometry-based devices, SphygmoCor and PulsePen, in 106 patients (57.5 ± 14.1 years) from our cardiovascular department. Results: In SphygmoCor and PulsePen, rSBP2 correlated well with aSBP and cSBP (R > 0.80, P <0.001), but significantly underestimated them with a discrepancy ranging from 1.2 ± 5.1 to 13.9 ± 10.9 mmHg. The slopes of regression line in the correlation plots between the PulsePen rSBP2 and cSBPs from SphygmoCor and PulsePen were 0.91 and 0.99, respectively, and did not significantly differ from 1. Conclusion: PulsePen rSBP2 underestimated cSBP with a systematical but clinically substantial discrepancy, whereas SphygmoCor rSBP2 underestimated aSBP and cSBP with a nonsystematical but much smaller disparity. From a practical point of view, neither of these noninvasive devices can be applied for the precise estimation of central SBP with rSBP2 in clinical practice.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)676-681
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Hypertension
Volume29
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2011

Fingerprint

Equipment and Supplies
Manometry

Keywords

  • central SBP
  • PulsePen
  • radial late-SBP
  • SphygmoCor
  • validation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine
  • Physiology
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Zhang, Y., Agnoletti, D., Protogerou, A. D., Wang, J. G., Topouchian, J., Salvi, P., ... Blacher, J. (2011). Radial late-SBP as a surrogate for central SBP. Journal of Hypertension, 29(4), 676-681. https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0b013e328342f05f

Radial late-SBP as a surrogate for central SBP. / Zhang, Yi; Agnoletti, Davide; Protogerou, Athanase D.; Wang, Ji Guang; Topouchian, Jirar; Salvi, Paolo; Safar, Michel E.; Blacher, Jacques.

In: Journal of Hypertension, Vol. 29, No. 4, 04.2011, p. 676-681.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Zhang, Y, Agnoletti, D, Protogerou, AD, Wang, JG, Topouchian, J, Salvi, P, Safar, ME & Blacher, J 2011, 'Radial late-SBP as a surrogate for central SBP', Journal of Hypertension, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 676-681. https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0b013e328342f05f
Zhang Y, Agnoletti D, Protogerou AD, Wang JG, Topouchian J, Salvi P et al. Radial late-SBP as a surrogate for central SBP. Journal of Hypertension. 2011 Apr;29(4):676-681. https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0b013e328342f05f
Zhang, Yi ; Agnoletti, Davide ; Protogerou, Athanase D. ; Wang, Ji Guang ; Topouchian, Jirar ; Salvi, Paolo ; Safar, Michel E. ; Blacher, Jacques. / Radial late-SBP as a surrogate for central SBP. In: Journal of Hypertension. 2011 ; Vol. 29, No. 4. pp. 676-681.
@article{e68713a1b8c64a69aadd511f9a9326a8,
title = "Radial late-SBP as a surrogate for central SBP",
abstract = "Background: Recent studies indicated that central SBP could be estimated by radial late-SBP (rSBP2) with a small disparity. However, most of these studies were conducted by SphygmoCor with a transfer function. The agreement between rSBP2 and central SBP was also tested in several invasive studies, but with inconsistent results. The objective of the present study was, therefore, to investigate whether rSBP2, from commercially available noninvasive devices, could practically indicate central SBP in current clinical care. Methods: We assessed carotid SPB (cSBP) and aortic SBP (aSBP) and rSBP2 by two broadly used tonometry-based devices, SphygmoCor and PulsePen, in 106 patients (57.5 ± 14.1 years) from our cardiovascular department. Results: In SphygmoCor and PulsePen, rSBP2 correlated well with aSBP and cSBP (R > 0.80, P <0.001), but significantly underestimated them with a discrepancy ranging from 1.2 ± 5.1 to 13.9 ± 10.9 mmHg. The slopes of regression line in the correlation plots between the PulsePen rSBP2 and cSBPs from SphygmoCor and PulsePen were 0.91 and 0.99, respectively, and did not significantly differ from 1. Conclusion: PulsePen rSBP2 underestimated cSBP with a systematical but clinically substantial discrepancy, whereas SphygmoCor rSBP2 underestimated aSBP and cSBP with a nonsystematical but much smaller disparity. From a practical point of view, neither of these noninvasive devices can be applied for the precise estimation of central SBP with rSBP2 in clinical practice.",
keywords = "central SBP, PulsePen, radial late-SBP, SphygmoCor, validation",
author = "Yi Zhang and Davide Agnoletti and Protogerou, {Athanase D.} and Wang, {Ji Guang} and Jirar Topouchian and Paolo Salvi and Safar, {Michel E.} and Jacques Blacher",
year = "2011",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1097/HJH.0b013e328342f05f",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "676--681",
journal = "Journal of Hypertension",
issn = "0263-6352",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Radial late-SBP as a surrogate for central SBP

AU - Zhang, Yi

AU - Agnoletti, Davide

AU - Protogerou, Athanase D.

AU - Wang, Ji Guang

AU - Topouchian, Jirar

AU - Salvi, Paolo

AU - Safar, Michel E.

AU - Blacher, Jacques

PY - 2011/4

Y1 - 2011/4

N2 - Background: Recent studies indicated that central SBP could be estimated by radial late-SBP (rSBP2) with a small disparity. However, most of these studies were conducted by SphygmoCor with a transfer function. The agreement between rSBP2 and central SBP was also tested in several invasive studies, but with inconsistent results. The objective of the present study was, therefore, to investigate whether rSBP2, from commercially available noninvasive devices, could practically indicate central SBP in current clinical care. Methods: We assessed carotid SPB (cSBP) and aortic SBP (aSBP) and rSBP2 by two broadly used tonometry-based devices, SphygmoCor and PulsePen, in 106 patients (57.5 ± 14.1 years) from our cardiovascular department. Results: In SphygmoCor and PulsePen, rSBP2 correlated well with aSBP and cSBP (R > 0.80, P <0.001), but significantly underestimated them with a discrepancy ranging from 1.2 ± 5.1 to 13.9 ± 10.9 mmHg. The slopes of regression line in the correlation plots between the PulsePen rSBP2 and cSBPs from SphygmoCor and PulsePen were 0.91 and 0.99, respectively, and did not significantly differ from 1. Conclusion: PulsePen rSBP2 underestimated cSBP with a systematical but clinically substantial discrepancy, whereas SphygmoCor rSBP2 underestimated aSBP and cSBP with a nonsystematical but much smaller disparity. From a practical point of view, neither of these noninvasive devices can be applied for the precise estimation of central SBP with rSBP2 in clinical practice.

AB - Background: Recent studies indicated that central SBP could be estimated by radial late-SBP (rSBP2) with a small disparity. However, most of these studies were conducted by SphygmoCor with a transfer function. The agreement between rSBP2 and central SBP was also tested in several invasive studies, but with inconsistent results. The objective of the present study was, therefore, to investigate whether rSBP2, from commercially available noninvasive devices, could practically indicate central SBP in current clinical care. Methods: We assessed carotid SPB (cSBP) and aortic SBP (aSBP) and rSBP2 by two broadly used tonometry-based devices, SphygmoCor and PulsePen, in 106 patients (57.5 ± 14.1 years) from our cardiovascular department. Results: In SphygmoCor and PulsePen, rSBP2 correlated well with aSBP and cSBP (R > 0.80, P <0.001), but significantly underestimated them with a discrepancy ranging from 1.2 ± 5.1 to 13.9 ± 10.9 mmHg. The slopes of regression line in the correlation plots between the PulsePen rSBP2 and cSBPs from SphygmoCor and PulsePen were 0.91 and 0.99, respectively, and did not significantly differ from 1. Conclusion: PulsePen rSBP2 underestimated cSBP with a systematical but clinically substantial discrepancy, whereas SphygmoCor rSBP2 underestimated aSBP and cSBP with a nonsystematical but much smaller disparity. From a practical point of view, neither of these noninvasive devices can be applied for the precise estimation of central SBP with rSBP2 in clinical practice.

KW - central SBP

KW - PulsePen

KW - radial late-SBP

KW - SphygmoCor

KW - validation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952765432&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952765432&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/HJH.0b013e328342f05f

DO - 10.1097/HJH.0b013e328342f05f

M3 - Article

C2 - 21252700

AN - SCOPUS:79952765432

VL - 29

SP - 676

EP - 681

JO - Journal of Hypertension

JF - Journal of Hypertension

SN - 0263-6352

IS - 4

ER -